Comey Defends Decision Not To Recommend Indictment of Hillary

My numbers are from a unbiased factual source. Yours are from a gamed poll. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You really are a dumb-ass if you imagine CBS is "gaming" a poll for Trump. And FWIW, the CNN poll says hildebeest's dishonesty factor is 68% with the public!

You really are a dumb-ass if you imagine CBS is "gaming" a poll for Trump. And FWIW, the CNN poll says hildebeest's dishonesty factor is 68% with the public!
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That's all they have ...... IB ...... you know that?

What is HillariousNoMore going to do to "change" since she's a "Change Maker"!

You really are a dumb-ass if you imagine CBS is "gaming" a poll for Trump. And FWIW, the CNN poll says hildebeest's dishonesty factor is 68% with the public!
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Anytime the media says something you like you think they are stand up if they say different then they are full of shit maybe they said because of their CEO likes Trump.
Leslie Moonves said "Trump may not be good for America, but he is good for CBS"
So tell me how impartial CBS is again!

Anytime the media says something you like you think they are stand up if they say different then they are full of shit maybe they said because of their CEO likes Trump.
Leslie Moonves said "Trump may not be good for America, but he is good for CBS"
So tell me how impartial CBS is again! Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Hey, dumb-ass! In case you didn't notice, here's a reminder: the lame-stream media was caught by Wikileaks taking marching orders from the DNC which was controlled by a hildebeest operative, dumb-ass. The lame-stream media's bias against Republicans has been laid bare by Wikileaks, dumb-ass. Hence, any anti-Trump rhetoric has to be taken with a grain of salt; whereas, any anti-hildebeest report is very remarkable, dumb-ass.

That's all they have ...... IB ...... you know that?

What is HillariousNoMore going to do to "change" since she's a "Change Maker"!

Originally Posted by LexusLover

+1

Anytime the media says something you like you think they are stand up if they say different then they are full of shit maybe they said because of their CEO likes Trump.
Leslie Moonves said "Trump may not be good for America, but he is good for CBS"
So tell me how impartial CBS is again! Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Thanks for showing once again how double standard you are. I didn't need wiki or any other source,( that one day you like and one day you don't) to prove my point either. It is right in your face and you deny it. That is why I am gonna laugh my ass off when Trump tells you guys he was just playing you. Too late to get a real candidate. You should have voted for Castle as conservative as you say you are. Wait a minute! Maybe you are not conservative, just a bigoted misogynistic Klansman.

Thanks for showing once again how double standard you are. I didn't need wiki or any other source,( that one day you like and one day you don't) to prove my point either. It is right in your face and you deny it. That is why I am gonna laugh my ass off when Trump tells you guys he was just playing you. Too late to get a real candidate. You should have voted for Castle as conservative as you say you are. Wait a minute! Maybe you are not conservative, just a bigoted misogynistic Klansman. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You'd be the dumb-ass ignoring the facts, dumb-ass. Wikileaks pulled back the curtain and revealed, in detail, the emails coaching the lame-stream media on what to say and what angle they should take on a given story, dumb-ass. And just a reminder, dumb-ass, Odumbo's boy Gruber called you dim-retard minions "stupid" because you actually are stupid enough to believe what they tell you, dumb-ass ... of course, that's another one of those lib-retard stories you deny and don't want to hear.

You'd be the dumb-ass ignoring the facts, dumb-ass. Wikileaks pulled back the curtain and revealed, in detail, the emails coaching the lame-stream media on what to say and what angle they should take on a given story, dumb-ass. And just a reminder, dumb-ass, Odumbo's boy Gruber called you dim-retard minions "stupid" because you actually are stupid enough to believe what they tell you, dumb-ass ... of course, that's another one of those lib-retard stories you deny and don't want to hear. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Would you be so kind as to pointing out where I said anything about wiki one way our another.

Take a look at this while you are at it.

"After the story has had a good 24-48 hours to simmer, even the mainstream press has come around to the idea that the #DNCleaks are a big deal, and they are aghast at the revelations contained therein. It's supposed to be a big deal that the chair of the DNC and her allies repeatedly put their fingers on the scales of the Democrat race. I suppose that in the wonderful world of faux naïveté that we are all supposed to inhabit, we should all be shocked at the brazen openness with which the DNC showed favoritism in what was supposed to be an intra-party contest.

I guess the main difference between the Democrats and Republicans is that the Democrats for the most part have the decency to keep this stuff on the downlow whereas the campaign arms of the Republican party do it in the open. The NRSC openly stated that they were not going to support Darryl Glenn for Senate if he won the GOP primary over their favorites. Their consultants like Brian James Walsh regularly spout off on Twitter about conservative challengers - even when they are not running against incumbents - and never face any sort of discipline.

As I covered extensively last week, the GOP was openly hostile to rules challenges by conservatives at the convention - even those that had nothing to do with Trump or embarrassing Trump. They used their weight as party operatives and the threat of withheld funding to prevent any changes to the nominating process at all, even though the GOP itself should theoretically be neutral on this score."

Would you be so kind as to pointing out where I said anything about wiki one way our another.

Take a look at this while you are at it.

"After the story has had a good 24-48 hours to simmer, even the mainstream press has come around to the idea that the #DNCleaks are a big deal, and they are aghast at the revelations contained therein. It's supposed to be a big deal that the chair of the DNC and her allies repeatedly put their fingers on the scales of the Democrat race. I suppose that in the wonderful world of faux naïveté that we are all supposed to inhabit, we should all be shocked at the brazen openness with which the DNC showed favoritism in what was supposed to be an intra-party contest.

I guess the main difference between the Democrats and Republicans is that the Democrats for the most part have the decency to keep this stuff on the downlow whereas the campaign arms of the Republican party do it in the open. The NRSC openly stated that they were not going to support Darryl Glenn for Senate if he won the GOP primary over their favorites. Their consultants like Brian James Walsh regularly spout off on Twitter about conservative challengers - even when they are not running against incumbents - and never face any sort of discipline.

As I covered extensively last week, the GOP was openly hostile to rules challenges by conservatives at the convention - even those that had nothing to do with Trump or embarrassing Trump. They used their weight as party operatives and the threat of withheld funding to prevent any changes to the nominating process at all, even though the GOP itself should theoretically be neutral on this score." Originally Posted by MT Pockets

That's precisely the point, dumb-ass. You didn't acknowledge Wikileaks; hence, you are blindly -- or ignorantly -- ignoring the Wikileaks release that revealed how the DNC told the lame-stream media what to do and say and the lame-stream media talking-heads, like Chuck Todd, said "When?" and "How high?", dimwit.

When will the nonstop whining end ... Obaminable and HillaryNoMore have developed an "art form" of kicking the badnews can down the road until "after the next election."

Just be patient .... the truth will emerge ... and then you can whine ... "that's old news!"

That's precisely the point, dumb-ass. You didn't acknowledge Wikileaks; hence, you are blindly -- or ignorantly -- ignoring the Wikileaks release that revealed how the DNC told the lame-stream media what to do and say and the lame-stream media talking-heads, like Chuck Todd, said "When?" and "How high?", dimwit. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Why do I need to acknowledge them? I did actually I used them to show your double standard. Here is another example of your bullshit, you only like them if its in your favor. Had Obama shut them down as you guys wanted you would not have the fodder you are spreading now about Hillary. Hypocritical dumbass!

http://www.cnet.com/news/republicans...eaks-response/

Why do I need to acknowledge them? I did actually I used them to show your double standard. Here is another example of your bullshit, you only like them if its in your favor. Had Obama shut them down as you guys wanted you would not have the fodder you are spreading now about Hillary. Hypocritical dumbass!

http://www.cnet.com/news/republicans...eaks-response/ Originally Posted by MT Pockets

The only double standard in play is yours and the lame-stream media's, dumb-ass. Wikileaks demonstrably proved the lame-stream media is a mouth piece for the Clintons. Hence, again, any and all of the lame-stream media's ranting and railing against Trump must be taken with a grain of salt, because that's the norm. Conversely, any lame-stream criticism of hildebeest is noteworthy, because such criticism is the exception; not the norm, dumb-ass.

Would you be so kind as to pointing out where I said anything about wiki one way our (sic) another?] Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You might want to check your previous post, MT Pockface:

I didn't need wiki or any other source.... to prove my point either. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Yes I did read my own link(s).

I must have read them before Gowdy redacted them and you guys the latter.
It clearly says she was attempting to set up a way to get her email securely but they shut her down like they do any Dem in office. They "suggested" she use the lame duck government system . She found a more secure way. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Wow, listen to this fool... now he's blaming Trey Gowdy... or he thinks the security folks at NSA have a hard-on for Dems... he's even arguing that hildebeest opted for her illegal home-brew server because it was "more secure" than the "lame duck government systems"!



Hahahahaha!

This newbie is a riot!

I can't wait to see what preposterous justifications he will come up with NEXT for hildebeest's slime and lies!

You might want to check your previous post, MT Pockface:



Originally Posted by lustylad

Your comments make no sense. Then again I noticed none of your comments do so kinda hard to respond to them.

I didn't mention Gowdy, but now that you did here is a little info you might enjoy. By the way who the fuck are you? So far you have hurled insults at me with no real substance. Then again you are a Trump voter so why am I surprised. At least IB has a valid point now and then.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027841611

http://www.newsweek.com/another-bad-...i-panel-384592