Outrageous! Federal Prosecutors Recommend 7-9 Years For Roger Stone

free the political prisoner roger stone

The faux Religion from a Livertarian (sic) is as tiresome as 9500 and his robespierre memes.

Thank you - ftw!
Whether Stone spends a day in prison is not yet adjudicated - a request for a new trial is befoe the Judge. Originally Posted by oeb11

Says the Parrot who spouts the exact same names....over and over and over.

Thank you - ftw!
Whether Stone spends a day in prison is not yet adjudicated - a request for a new trial is befoe the Judge. Originally Posted by oeb11

He is not getting a new trial.

He is getting pardoned, haven't you been paying attention.

free the political prisoner roger stone Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Why?

free the political prisoner roger stone Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

The Judge just bitch slapped him yet again in court.

Where is LL calling on a new trial and jury?

the judge is obviously biased. she launches a 40 minute lecture on Stone with unfounded accusations.

I'd get her removed!!!

we now have a biased jurist and a biased judge.

He's going to appeal on this for sure.

Lady Justice Spurns Her Blinders For Trump Associates

People like Justice Amy Berman Jackson, who claim to hold the greatest devotion to our institutions, who purport to cherish the rule of law above all else, are the ones responsible for systematically demolishing it all.

https://amgreatness.com/2020/02/20/l...mp-associates/

The claim sounded like something from Representative Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) or Rachel Maddow or any number of Russian collusion propagandists: “He was not prosecuted for standing up for the president. He was prosecuted for covering up for the president.”

Those words, however, were not uttered on MSNBC but rather in a federal courtroom by Amy Berman Jackson, a U.S. district court judge seated in the nation’s capital, whose job is to ensure the fair administration of justice based on the rule of law. The “he” Jackson was referring to is Roger Stone, a Trump confidant; the “president,” of course, is Donald Trump.

Former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy wrote this of the government’s case against the eccentric political gadfly prior to his sentencing Thursday:

The Stone prosecution is more politics than law enforcement. It was the Mueller probe’s last gasp at pretending there might be something to the Russia-collusion narrative. Notwithstanding that, when the “gee, it sure feels like there could be some collusion here” indictment was filed, over a year and a half after special counsel Robert Mueller was appointed, it had long been manifest that there was no Trump–Russia conspiracy.

It appears that Jackson, like so many Trump-haters in the Beltway, still clings to the fantasy that the collusion hoax is legitimate.

But there is no evidence to support Judge Jackson’s accusation, nor did she offer any explanation.

Jackson’s purpose was clear: To assist the Democrats’ nonstop crusade to undermine the credibility of Nunes and his report, and to suggest that if only Trump’s lackeys hadn’t hampered the work of dozens of super-smart investigators working with unlimited resources, proof of the secret conspiracy would have been uncovered and Trump would have been ousted from the White House.

Covering up what judge? Do you have evidence that Mueller couldn't find? This judge took a page right out of the Shitt for brains playbook.

the judge is obviously biased. she launches a 40 minute lecture on Stone with unfounded accusations.

I'd get her removed!!!

we now have a biased jurist and a biased judge.

He's going to appeal on this for sure.

. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

A jury convicted Stone....what are you crying about the Judge for?

She gave Trump what he wanted. Less than 7-9 years.

She gave him 40 months....sounds fair.

This verdict is not getting overturned.

Trump is going to have to Pardon Stone.

Barr is even saying Stone is guilty.

A jury convicted Stone....what are you crying about the Judge for?

She gave Trump what he wanted. Less than 7-9 years.

She gave him 40 months....sounds fair.

This verdict is not getting overturned.

Trump is going to have to Pardon Stone.

Barr is even saying Stone is guilty.
Originally Posted by WTF

No, Barr said the sentence was excessive and it was. doesn't mean he thinks Stone is guilty.


Barr was right, the left was wrong | Opinion

https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/com...-20200221.html


It is a sign of our times that Attorney General William Barr tried to do something right and some illiberal liberals, including not a few in the media, decided that it was wrong on the basis of mindless presidential squawks, factual ignorance, and in some cases, political opportunity.


What it adds up to is that the illiberal liberals are doing what they accuse Barr of doing, namely going to war with justice and other basic democratic principles. But at least Judge Amy Berman Jackson saw the light.


What she did was sentence Roger Stone to three years and four months in prison instead of the seven to nine years initially recommended by four prosecutors whose numbers included two Mueller probe attorneys. There are experts saying they were way out of line, but let’s get there by first observing that Stone is an author, a long-term political player majoring in wily tricks, and a friend of President Donald Trump’s — enough right there to get him in trouble


Back during the 2016 campaign, he tried to communicate with WikiLeaks, which was passing around emails revealing behind-doors discussions in Hillary Clinton’s campaign. He tried to get a radio host to back up misinformation and he didn’t. Stone then told him he should prepare to die and that he would kill his dog if he didn’t shut up.


There was a trial, Stone was found guilty, and it was then that the prosecutors recommended putting him in prison for seven to nine years. However, these guys do not act independently but have to report to a Department of Justice supervisor, who reviewed the sentencing recommendation they wanted to hand the judge and who first off is reported to have said this doesn’t work.


Experts explain that there are sentencing guidelines and varied factors that can be taken into consideration. For instance, we are informed, the radio host, also a leftist comedian, knew Stone well enough not take the threat about his dog or dying seriously, and that would seem to mean there was no violence in the tampering. It has also been observed that Stone was a first offender, that he was 67 years old and in bad health, and that the Mueller probe never found any kind of illegal collusion with the Russians.


The Justice Department supervisor reportedly said the sentencing should be something between three and four years, and the prosecutors snarled and threatened to resign, which means that either way they would get their way — get the sentence recommendation they wanted, or make the department look like a political coddler.


The supervisor is said to have backed down, but Barr and others looked at the issue. Trump jumped in, broadcasting how awful the sentence recommendation was, and the world came tumbling down. Barr, who also wanted a milder sentence, asked Trump to please shut up, and then, when he didn’t, threatened to resign, but we still had partisan punchers in Congress saying Barr should resign.


On top of that, there were 1,100 former Justice Department employees asking for his resignation through a nonprofit group that one journalist disclosed had been founded by progressives who also cheered the Mueller probe. Then there were the judges who also objected to the new recommendation, even though it was still just a recommendation. The court did not have to heed it.


Even though Trump is an outrage who just keeps on giving to his political enemies, it is a fact that federal prosecutors are answerable to the Department of Justice. As Kimberley Strassel in the Wall Street Journal has argued, the idea that all federal officials out there should be unanswerable to anyone is a description of the administrative state that more and more runs our affairs.


Some things to keep in mind: The whole trial may be thrown out because of apparent anti-Stone bias by a juror. The Justice Department has outright skipped prosecuting some highly suspect liberal folks. And the left hates Barr, maybe the best thing that has happened to the Trump administration, because he secured a superb prosecutor now investigating possible criminal activity by officials involved in phony FISA warrants and the Mueller probe.


Jay Ambrose is an op-ed columnist for the Tribune News Service. speaktojay@aol.com

No, Barr said the sentence was excessive and it was. doesn't mean he thinks Stone is guilty.
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

So you are saying Barr prosecuted a man he thought was innocent?

Are you fucking nuts?

Do you not research anything before posting?

https://www.mediaite.com/news/bill-b...was-convicted/

So you are saying Barr prosecuted a man he thought was innocent?

Are you fucking nuts?

Do you not research anything before posting?

https://www.mediaite.com/news/bill-b...was-convicted/ Originally Posted by WTF

no you dim bulb, he accepted the findings of the jury after it was made. he felt there were grounds for the charges. show me where he said Stone was guilty before the case was put to the jury.

and remember yous think Capitalism is responsible for the debt!

no you dim bulb, he accepted the findings of the jury after it was made. he felt there were grounds for the charges. show me where he said Stone was guilty before the case was put to the jury.
! Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

So you think Barr thought Stone was innocent and prosecuted him anyway? Are you really trying to convince me of this nonsense? And after prosecuting a man he thought innocent....he said the following?




The segment began with Barr stating he was happy with the conviction of Stone.
“The Stone case was prosecuted while I was attorney general. And I supported it. I think it was established, he was convicted of obstructing Congress and witness tampering. And I thought that was a righteous prosecution. And I was happy that he was convicted,” Barr stated.

and remember yous think Capitalism is responsible for the debt! Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Please tell me under what system of government you think we operate under and I'll agree that is the system responsible for our debt.

So you think Barr thought Stone was innocent and prosecuted him anyway? Are you really trying to convince me of this nonsense? And after prosecuting a man he thought innocent....he said the following?


no you tard, i said he thought there were grounds to prosecute. you do know that Barr could have told them to drop the case yeah? he didn't. which disproves yous and jaxtard's contention Barr is Trump's lackey.

The segment began with Barr stating he was happy with the conviction of Stone.
“The Stone case was prosecuted while I was attorney general. And I supported it. I think it was established, he was convicted of obstructing Congress and witness tampering. And I thought that was a righteous prosecution. And I was happy that he was convicted,” Barr stated.



Please tell me under what system of government you think we operate under and I'll agree that is the system responsible for our debt.


a Federal Republic. where do you see Capitalism in that?

Originally Posted by WTF

of all the dumb shit you've ever posted, the outright dumbest is that Capitalism is the cause of the federal debt. the cause of the fed debt (and you still haven't said what part is actually good) is the 1913 Fed Reserve Act and Congress who knew that the Fed would just print more fiat currency to cover it.


not even Paul Krugman will back you up on that shit, sport. Capitalism isn't the cause of the Fed debt, if anything it will be the cure, if Congress is reigned in from constantly overspending.


i'm pulling a ChungHamster on yous .. you have 5 minutes to prove that the Fed debt is the direct fault of Capitalism. if yous don't respond with proof in 5 minutes yous is wrong! good luck!


BAHHAHAHAAAA

i'm pulling a ChungHamster on yous .. you have 5 minutes to prove that the Fed debt is the direct fault of Capitalism. if yous don't respond with proof in 5 minutes yous is wrong! good luck!


BAHHAHAHAAAA

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

TIME'S UP!! YOUS WRONG!



BAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAAAAHAAAAAA

i'm pulling a ChungHamster on yous .. you have 5 minutes to prove that the Fed debt is the direct fault of Capitalism. if yous don't respond with proof in 5 minutes yous is wrong! good luck!


BAHHAHAHAAAA

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

TIME'S UP!! YOUS WRONG!

BAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAAAAHAAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

you gave him 11 minutes. lol!

you gave him 11 minutes. lol! Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

yep. twice as long and 1 minute over spare. you should read ecky9.5's "democratic socialism" primer .. as if he thinks that proves the Fed debt is caused by Capitalism.


just more nonsense babble by the young misguided hoodkat.



BAHHAAAAAAA