So if everyone spent time in the military getting paid by the taxpayers , you'd have no problem with them then getting a free education?maybe
Originally Posted by WTF
maybeI guess he skipped the "community college" vacation.
one of my friends had his post-high school education paid in full by the military and all he had to do was join them for 6 yrs post medical school.
smart guy, not a lot of money, is now a ortho...paid for on the taxpayers dime
he spent time in iraq training.... post graduation, well worth it
saved him $~200K Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker
wtf are you talking about?
BTW, I disagree with your dismissal of "social studies" as unnecessary. Teaching kids that the wheel has already been invented will help direct them towards new ventures. Teaching students about other people and other government and economic systems will enable them to "stand on the shoulders of giants" and see further than those who came before. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
long post, I can't read all that, so I picked out this:Every discipline benefits from knowing about what came before, bigcockpussylicker, whether your talking about science and math or government and diplomacy. Like Newton said, bigcockpussylicker, "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."
wtf are you talking about?
so if kids didnt take social studies, they'd go try to invent the wheel?
I had 11 yrs of social studies
I took CC westren civ when I was a Senior
I have ONE class on GOVERNMENT, they should teach that more.
school is around for kids to go out and be able to contribute to society......
learning whatever popagange about columbus/magellen/cortex has NEVER been useful to me, except in trivia games. Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker
Yes ...Vague post
Originally Posted by LexusLover
Vague postPre-Monica -& Benghazi........ Oh those were the days !
yes, they were fucking up?
or
yes, they were working hard?
If I recall, both those kids went to Yale law skool, eh?
you cant really say both, same way you t you can also be dieting and ONLY eat junk food and still lose weight, in which case, you'd yeah, you're dieting, the junk food is irrelevant Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker
a little?No, just a little. You likely aren't falling into the parameters of the people Obama is trying to "help" anyway.
a lot, my friend
interesting I cannot get money, even with stellar grades, etc
and a friend always complained SHE could not get money, but her friends, of equal income/not as smart, could BECAUSE they had kids.
so she didnt have kids at 17, while they did, so she can't find money to go to college, but they can?>
does that make sense to not help those that do everything right,,
I'm not saying don't help the teen moms who are smart enough and have the drive to go to college, but help those who don't have kids and just want to go to college.
good grief Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker
