TEXTING, PM'S, EMAIL.... are you fucking kidding me?

I do not believe that I am wrong, my good man, at least not how NCNS reviews are handled here in the Austin section.
You are correct about being able to write a review of a NCNS and them not being eligible for premium access.
But here in the Austin section such reviews are typically moved to the coed section, usually with a comment like this from one of the Austin mods:

Since no activities took place, this does not qualify as a review. Moving to Coed as per our custom.

I do not know if that is how they are handled in other city sections but in my experience that is how it goes here in the Austin section.

So if a ncns review is written here in the Austin review section it will very likely wind up in the coed section.
Members also should not write reviews of cancellations or general flakiness, those subjects are more suited for the coed section.
That was the intended gist of my original post. Originally Posted by Tatonka

Let me see if I can summon one of the GODS.... stay tuned!

I do not believe that I am wrong, my good man, at least not how NCNS reviews are handled here in the Austin section.
You are correct about being able to write a review of a NCNS and them not being eligible for premium access.
But here in the Austin section such reviews are typically moved to the coed section, usually with a comment like this from one of the Austin mods:

Since no activities took place, this does not qualify as a review. Moving to Coed as per our custom.

I do not know if that is how they are handled in other city sections but in my experience that is how it goes here in the Austin section.

So if a ncns review is written here in the Austin review section it will very likely wind up in the coed section.
Members also should not write reviews of cancellations or general flakiness, those subjects are more suited for the coed section.
That was the intended gist of my original post. Originally Posted by Tatonka

Everyone is about half right here. A NCNS should not be written on a review template in the review forums. If you are going to report one, that is fine...however start a "New Thread" in the local Coed Discussions section. You are not going to receive PA credit for it but it is usually valuable information for the community. It will also not be attached to the ladies profile. Posting in the coed section also allows the lady in question to post a rebuttal to the information, if she chooses to do so.

If you do write a review a NCNS in the review section, it will always end up in coed anyway. So save everyone a couple some work and just put it there to start with.

Everyone is about half right here. A NCNS should not be written on a review template in the review forums. If you are going to report one, that is fine...however start a "New Thread" in the local Coed Discussions section. You are not going to receive PA credit for it but it is usually valuable information for the community. It will also not be attached to the ladies profile. Posting in the coed section also allows the lady in question to post a rebuttal to the information, if she chooses to do so.

If you do write a review a NCNS in the review section, it will always end up in coed anyway. So save everyone a couple some work and just put it there to start with. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

Ahhhh I stand corrected. Previously if the item was NOT in a review format it was NOT attached to the provider. The Gods have spoken!

I saw the bat signal on the horizon, thought I better see what was going on! LOL

Now it's my turn STEFANY to ask a question. Do you have any idea why your last review was a NO REVIEW?

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=833734


Originally Posted by Still Looking

Did you bother to check his ONLY OTHER REVIEW? Also a "no".

And by the way, it was probably terrible because of HIM? Hah. I'm not worried about a "no" review, when it's from a guy who only ever writes "no"s.

You haven't even seen me or met me outside of the internet, because if you had, you'd agree that the guy was the problem, not me.

Now it's my turn STEFANY to ask a question. Do you have any idea why your last review was a NO REVIEW?

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=833734


Originally Posted by Still Looking

ALSO:

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=835225

is my last review.

Did you bother to check his ONLY OTHER REVIEW? Also a "no".

And by the way, it was probably terrible because of HIM? Hah. I'm not worried about a "no" review, when it's from a guy who only ever writes "no"s.

You haven't even seen me or met me outside of the internet, because if you had, you'd agree that the guy was the problem, not me. Originally Posted by Stefany

ALSO:

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=835225

is my last review. Originally Posted by Stefany

Answering a question with a question? I asked a very simple question. Kind of like when I contact a provider to schedule... WHERE & WHEN? Since I posted you got another review. You are right.Let me try again....do YOU know why one of your last two reviews was a NO REVIEW?

I saw the bat signal on the horizon, thought I better see what was going on! LOL Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

Also as a matter of clarity, if a meeting takes place meaning the door opens or you meet in the parking lot and make contact, then regardless of services being rendered or fees being exchanged, then this qualifies to be documented on a review template.

Answering a question with a question? I asked a very simple question. Kind of like when I contact a provider to schedule... WHERE & WHEN? Since I posted you got another review. You are right.Let me try again....do YOU know why one of your last two reviews was a NO REVIEW?
Originally Posted by Still Looking

The guy was scum. And I have a few others who will verify. You only get one side of the story with the review and supposedly I can't post my side without getting graphic and outing him as a complete loser.

The guy was scum. And I have a few others who will verify. You only get one side of the story with the review and supposedly I can't post my side without getting graphic and outing him as a complete loser. Originally Posted by Stefany

If you are going to call him loser and scum...might as well tell your side ...

His review was nothing but lies. But essentially it comes down to his word against mine. Look at my other reviews; look at his. Guy couldn't get hard, which normally wouldn't be a problem, but it was smaller than the size of my pinky. He had a bad attitude and was one of those "I'm paying for your time, I own you" guys. Not only that, but he OBVIOUSLY didn't read my showcase or other reviews. I do advertise as a BBW AND I do state my correct age as 21.

End of story. No one can prove one way or another with concrete evidence of what happens in a session (unless it is taped or recorded in some way).

I've been reading through this thread and all I can say is Wow. What a train wreck. Stefany, reckon you ought to just drop this and move on? IJS.....

Sure seems like ALL BUSINESS 3 days before the 1st and 3 days after the 1st of each month! I'm not sure where your percentages come from other than speculation but it seems to me and talking to many a provider this business is a means to get from point A to point B. Many get very use to the CASH and stay on. Many leave as fast as they came! Some use it as an ATM. Whens the last time you heard a lady say I've been doing this 10, 15 or 20 years? Originally Posted by Still Looking

I dont speculate about things I know.. 20 years of doing this is credibility enough, and I am not one here pissing and moaning like you..

looks like you got 'tricked' like the rest of us have been.. welcome to the club! now get over it and move on

The guy was scum. And I have a few others who will verify. You only get one side of the story with the review and supposedly I can't post my side without getting graphic and outing him as a complete loser. Originally Posted by Stefany

Hummmmmm so you got a NO because the guy was "SCUM"? There is NO such thing as hijacking an SL thread. Hell nobody even reads my posts or threAds. Your NOT allowed to post in "your" no review thread but you can post here all you want. You are welcome to speak freely here. Let's hear your side of the story. So is that your answer... you got a no because he was "SCUM"?

I dont speculate about things I know.. 20 years of doing this is credibility enough, and I am not one here pissing and moaning like you..

looks like you got 'tricked' like the rest of us have been.. welcome to the club! now get over it and move on Originally Posted by RALPHEY BOY

I have no idea what your talking about, but with 20 years of experience I'm certainly not going to question you. Thanks for sharing with us newbies.