Was waiting for this, lol
SCOTUS Leaker Increasingly Seems to Be Right-Winger
I'm gonna go full conspiracy with this one. Who do I think leaked it? Someone connected to Justice Thomas. Why? First, it would go along with the notion of wanting to make sure that the initial opinions stuck and second, it would put attention on this issue and take attention off of the Ginny Thomas issue. Originally Posted by Grace PrestonViolates Occams razor. And it doesn't make a lot of sense for the Conservatives to get themselves lined up to have death threats being made on themselves.
Heh....Have you read the nutcases posting their conspiracy content as if it is gospel? They would not even give you the password to the koolaid with that one.
I'm gonna go full conspiracy with this one. Who do I think leaked it? Someone connected to Justice Thomas. . Originally Posted by Grace Preston
Occams razor shouldn't really be applied when we're talking American politics. Originally Posted by Grace PrestonWhy?
He really should have recused himself from that vote in regards to the January 6th records-- the optics on it are really..... REALLY bad. Originally Posted by Grace PrestonDid Kagan recuse herself from the obamacare case? Optics are for Communists... time to stop playing pussyfoot with the left. No reason the Right should care about optics when it's obvious the Left doesn't..
I'm curious-- how is the protest illegal? I can grasp actions committed during a protest being illegal, but not the act of protest itself. Originally Posted by Grace Preston8 U.S. Code Section 1507 --
Ahh-- gotta prove they are intending to impede or influence, though. That's the catch--many of these people are still going to protest, even if the ruling is final.
Yeah-- you and I may have opinions on whether or not they are attempting to influence-- but the issue for a conviction is to prove it. Originally Posted by Grace Preston
Ahh-- gotta prove they are intending to impede or influence, though. That's the catch--many of these people are still going to protest, even if the ruling is final.That's for the court to decide.... but the law is obvious... and yet law "enforcement" stood idly by and arrested no one. Meanwhile January 6 folks are facing indefinite detention for walking into a building they were INVITED into.
Yeah-- you and I may have opinions on whether or not they are attempting to influence-- but the issue for a conviction is to prove it. Originally Posted by Grace Preston
My guess is if and when the break into the SC Chambers waving Rebel Flags ....then they will be treated like the January 6 insurgency, if not worse.
- near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or
- with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence,
- shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
We have all seen the video Grace. Were the protesters near a residence occupied by a judge making lots of noise? This is an illegal act but if we don't have law enforcement ready to use this law simply because it's the Left, then this shit has to change. Arrest and charge every one of these fuckers and stop this shit.
If it were up to me, nobody could protest in any residential neighborhood no matter who lives there. Originally Posted by HedonistForever