BAN Threads

boardman's Avatar
What part of I stay in my own threads "by & large" do you not understand?

You're just sassing off because I asked the mods to close your last thread and they did.

#modties

;-) Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Ok, so is this an example of you "by & large" staying in your own threads?
TryWeakly's Avatar
modties = modanal
You may be right TW.
I'll tell my friend
Cendell M's Avatar
I think I could learn to embrace "sugartaint" Originally Posted by boardman
Well i could appreciate a sugar taint,sugar puss and sugar tits... hell why not.

I see "modties" used over and over by a few on here.
Is that the same as "sucking dick"?
I am asking for a friend Originally Posted by tbone2u
Tbone2u:

if one was to look at who is actually using the stupid sayings, you will notice a trend of all the user id's that can be traced back to a single individual, who remains anonymous. Each of those accounts has used the same language on multiple occasions in different threads in different sections of the site so that anyone with an ability to do statistical analysis on word use, would come to the same conclusion that all of the "fluffer" accounts, e.g. sp, sc, usa, pxm, tw, fff, ..., originate from a single individual who most likely either guested their original account or were banned long ago.

As for the claim one person could not keep all the id's separated, I disagree. The reason I disagree is I have seen it first-hand being done on a different site and I know how that person did it. All the fluffer logins are there because the staff allows them to be here since they are generating thread bumps, i.e. post clicks, which will keep the site running.

The new guy on the block from San Antonio may be a real account or not, I don't know myself since I have never heard of him until his recent intrusion on to this section of the site. To address his claim that CryptKicker has "Global Moderator" on his profile, he is wrong. What KC has is "Moderating the darkness". Now if KC put what George wrote in his signature line, then it is absolutely meaningless since not everybody can read signature lines since they are only visible to those with Premium access.
And back to three side's question in the OP…

There is nothing in the guidelines that spell out a restriction on BAN threads. What has most likely happened is a “Super” Moderator has decided he did not like something going in a section of the site and decided to do a drive-by moderator job, poorly I might add. The problem is both he and SoulManIke are super moderators on the Austin section of the board, so there may have been some back-channel communication going on that the masses are not privy to at this time.
TryWeakly's Avatar




anyone with an ability to do statistical analysis on word use, would come to the same conclusion that all of the "fluffer" accounts, e.g. sp, sc, usa, pxm, tw, fff, ..., originate from a single individual who most likely either guested their original account or were banned long ago.




Originally Posted by PhantomofTheOpera



Dafuq ?

Now I am slightly offended....

I have only one account.

I am not any other persona on here. People such as SC and his other shandles have always thought I was, oh lets see...Namo, Dorian, Dorfy...i forget the long list of people they thought.

I am an observant mofo, and when I choose to use words that are "misspelt" like thinck, dayum, dafuq, fucktard, whoretard etccc. it is because they have become commonplace amongst the group and employ special meaning...



UITB means Up In This Bitch...


You [collectively] got problems that go waaay back before my arrival UITB... none of which I was any part of.

Now, because I am one observant mofo and smarter than most of you UITB I enjoy making people thinck I am someone else...

What else you got?

Besides... isnt statistical analysis against the rules UITB ?
TryWeakly's Avatar
Tbone2u:
not everybody can read signature lines since they are only visible to those with Premium access.
Originally Posted by PhantomofTheOpera
SIGNATURE lines are not visible without Premium access?

me thincks otherwise.
I just think it's very sad to allow all the race-baiting and political bullshit to continue. The ones that let it continue are even more suspect to me than the one that are doing it.......then again...maybe they are the same.
I don't know but it's made a mockery out of this board and it's turned a lot of people away.
Sistine Chapel's Avatar
What part of I stay in my own threads "by & large" do you not understand?

You're just sassing off because I asked the mods to close your last thread and they did.

#modties

;-) Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel
I just think it's very sad to allow all the race-baiting and political bullshit to continue. The ones that let it continue are even more suspect to me than the one that are doing it.......then again...maybe they are the same.
I don't know but it's made a mockery out of this board and it's turned a lot of people away. Originally Posted by tbone2u
Let me guess you own a pet parrot...lol

Talk about cry me a river. Geez
I'm not crying sc. I'm just tired of your race-baiting
Everyone on this board should be as well.

You have taken it upon yourself to promote your private crusade.
It has no place here. It's sad that you think it does.


Take a look at my signature line below and then look into a mirror.
Sistine Chapel's Avatar
There's an old cliche that goes: "want to know how to make a liar angry? Keep asking them questions.

I don't race bait. However, I do pose interesting questions. The only people that get tired of those intresting questions are the racists or those whose consciences are guilt stricken for being horrible people at some point in their lives. That's how I read your incessant whining. You don't like to see your shit floating on top of old smokey...lol
Yes sir....I can see you floating on top
What you don't seem to understand is this board is not about race. Only you make it about race.
If you insist on race-baiting then take it somewhere else.
I have a very hard time understanding why the mods let you continue.
This isn't the place for it. I know it isn't and the mods should know. It's only you and your other mandles.
boardman's Avatar
There's an old cliche that goes: "want to know how to make a liar angry? Keep asking them questions.

I don't race bait. However, I do pose interesting questions. The only people that get tired of those intresting questions are the racists or those whose consciences are guilt stricken for being horrible people at some point in their lives. That's how I read your incessant whining. You don't like to see your shit floating on top of old smokey...lol Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel
Is this another example of you "by and large" staying in your own thread?

Anyway, since you're here...bones is right. This board is about slinging pussy. You want to talk about anything but unless you're trying to shame the people involved in said slinging.
You're one to talk about horrible people. Just a couple of weeks ago you wished a guy an eternity in Hell on the day he died. That's about the best example of a horrible person I can think of.
Dont even get me started on whining...see your latest Barry Bonds thread...great example of your incessant whining.
TryWeakly's Avatar
And back to three side's question in the OP…

There is nothing in the guidelines that spell out a restriction on BAN threads. What has most likely happened is a “Super” Moderator has decided he did not like something going in a section of the site and decided to do a drive-by moderator job, poorly I might add. The problem is both he and SoulManIke are super moderators on the Austin section of the board, so there may have been some back-channel communication going on that the masses are not privy to at this time.
Originally Posted by PhantomofTheOpera


I'll take a guess...

I have read that Mods have been rumored to have multiple shandles.. sooo......

Perhaps on the back-channel these threads create drama on those channels and they caint figure out who said what bc

maybe one or more of the shandles may not be known to the others...and since it is all being down on the DL then the others get pissy....


..and... since there has been a lack of mod activity (no offense guys) then maybe the recent law changes, blackouts/whiteouts whatever and other bullshit has lessened their desire / ability to perform the duties at hand...



That's merely speculation, tho.




Butt I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night....