The question is hypothetical. Who knows what kind of pardox could have been created.. if we had not invaded Iraq. Things might have been worse.
Welcome back WTF. How was Hell?
Life doesn't work that way.... even on Eccie.
Nice try though, but you've pulled that childish garbage before of making an allegation against someone and then demanding they disprove your accusation.
I believe you brought that up with a sleazy hooker over in the Houston forum.
You made the statement.
Until you prove it with a link. You are a liar.
By the way ... in case you didn't realize it ... just by asking the question of what I think now, demonstrates you were LYING .... because if you had the link ... you wouldn't have to ask. You fabricated more shit, and now you are trying to defect and obscure the obvious .... YOU ARE A LIAR. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Really....all you have to do is say that knowing then what you know now you would not have invaded and i then will admit that i lied mistakenly about knowing your answer.Why you failed to successfully analyze the Zimmerman case and failed to "guess" correctly, is painfully (for you) obvious (to me). You OBVIOUSLY thought Zimmerman was required to prove he was "not guilty."
You can't because you still would invade. Prove me wrong and admit it was a mistake. Originally Posted by WTF
The question is hypothetical. Who knows what kind of pardox could have been created.. if we had not invaded Iraq. Things might have been worse. Originally Posted by TheDaliLamaWTF, you didn't take long to get back to square one, ...
Knowing what I know now, that Obama would squander everything he could, hell no I wouldn't have Originally Posted by nevergaveitathoughtYou took the long way on a short bus but you got here never. More than i can say for more than a couple of these WMD truthers! I swear to God if i don't feel blessed every day hanging around you brainiacs knowing how bad it really could be!
Why you failed to successfully analyze the Zimmerman case and failed to "guess" correctly, is painfully (for you) obvious (to me). You OBVIOUSLY thought Zimmerman was required to prove he was "not guilty."
You are wrong again.
WTF, you didn't take long to get back to square one, ...
.... did it? Originally Posted by LexusLover
I got ole LL boxed up in what that funny smelling Lama fellow would call one of them there paradoxes. Originally Posted by WTFIn a strange sort of way, I understand the dilemma that you have put LLidiot in.
I'm not going to read through 6 pages of drivel, but I will raise my hand and say that yes, even knowing what we know now, I still support and agree with invading Iraq.
Now flame away fellas Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh
We already knew you were an idiot. Originally Posted by shanmAgreed. Why? You have shown your callous nature previously, but to so quickly dismiss the lives of those lost, for a lie, is surprising.
I'm not going to read through 6 pages of drivel, but I will raise my hand and say that yes, even knowing what we know now, I still support and agree with invading Iraq.Look some folks would still eat a hot pepper, even after it causing you to shit your britches. There just ain't many like you SOTF...
Now flame away fellas Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh