It's like they do not care that we have kids or family outside of what we do Originally Posted by candilady214Did you? I mean since you let him record you in first place.
So do the ladies have any recourse in this or not? I always thought that if whoever downloads the vid doesn't directly profit from the video then there's nothing that can be done. Unless it's falls under copy-write. Originally Posted by HerculesI think the argument here could be that the client paid to film the porn himself. Thus owning the rights to it. Not sure of it matters if he is making money off of it or not.
I think the argument here could be that the client paid to film the porn himself. Thus owning the rights to it. Not sure of it matters if he is making money off of it or not.yeah if she let him take any pics, she gives up her rights to other pics......just sayin....hope he makes bank......big bank!
I doubt any model releases were signed, which would cloudy up the issue as well.
Also, isn't it illegal to film porn in Texas? I honestly don't know.
Now, as where it falls on the revenge porn aspect... *shrug*
I DO like the idea of "if they want to film you doing x y z they need to let you take a picture of them too" idea. Mutually assured destruction and all. But, not just a face shot. A face shot in a compromising position. Equal standing. Originally Posted by ~Ze~
yeah if she let him take any pics, she gives up her rights to other pics......just sayin....hope he makes bank......big bank! Originally Posted by Tony Gambinohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuMB...aPKps&index=33
Once you allow him to take video image, it's his to do with what he wants.I do not believe this is legally correct. There are two issues: 1) copyright and 2) use. The person who films or snaps the photo owns the content. Use is another matter. In any type of commercial filming you would typically have to get a written release from anyone appearing in the video that can be recognizable. Example: You do not a release from a helmeted motorcyclists driving by as you are filming. When all you have is a verbal "OK", it generally won't cut it in a court of law. Written releases tend to include whatever intended uses might be. Without specific uses of the material, it becomes a battle over what the verbal "OK" covered as far as use.
If you don't want that occuring, it's your responsibility not to let it be done.
You could always only allow images to be taken on your phone then email approved images.
Then you can delete images with full knowledge they weren't uploaded to cloud.
Pretty much common sense. Originally Posted by rockerrick