Excuse my searchfu. It is weak.Haha
But where these fine ass 4 bill hoes at? Originally Posted by canihitit
Uhmmm she comes to mind...
http://eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=223637
Excuse my searchfu. It is weak.Haha
But where these fine ass 4 bill hoes at? Originally Posted by canihitit
Poor Mythos! Originally Posted by junglemonkeyEh. Idc. I already know he's a douche. I do hope his entire family's genetic lineage in the soup of existence stops with him but that doesn't mean I want false accusation against him to stand either. Facts are all I ever care about. Emotions are fleeting.
This shit right here is a case in point as to exactly why we do nothing in a "he said, she said" situation. Originally Posted by SpiceItUpAgree.
Eh. Idc. I already know he's a douche. I do hope his entire family's genetic lineage in the soup of existence stops with him but that doesn't mean I want false accusation against him to stand either. Facts are all I ever care about. Emotions are fleeting.
I think he should have already been banned for his self admitted secret recordings and his obvious predator behavior. I have not seen a direct rule regarding that, other than an interpretation of the "stalking" rule but precedents are made daily creating new policy. I believe if the OP is proven to have cried wolf re: false review, that she should be banned as well.
Agree. Originally Posted by Mythos
Fuck that. Originally Posted by canihitit
HahaThis is just my opinion, but inking up a body like that, as she did, to me, would be like giving a small kindergarteners a bag full of colored permanent markers and turning them loose inside and out on my lexus. I think it was adversely affect my ultimate resale value. I do not understand people sometimes but life is about flavor, what is yours?
Uhmmm she comes to mind...
http://eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=223637
Originally Posted by Natalia Mori
LMAO junglemonkey speaking the TRUTH this morning.....butt, butt, butt, does this apply to the fine ass 4 bills hoes too, or just to the ones that charge by the pound?Originally Posted by Natalia Mori
Eh. Idc. I already know he's a douche. I do hope his entire family's genetic lineage in the soup of existence stops with him but that doesn't mean I want false accusation against him to stand either. Facts are all I ever care about. Emotions are fleeting.
I think he should have already been banned for his self admitted secret recordings and his obvious predator behavior. I have not seen a direct rule regarding that, other than an interpretation of the "stalking" rule but precedents are made daily creating new policy. I believe if the OP is proven to have cried wolf re: false review, that she should be banned as well.
Agree. Originally Posted by Mythos
Eh. Idc. I already know he's a douche. [ . . . ] Facts are all I ever care about. Emotions are fleeting.Agreed. But how are facts determined in this voluntarily anonymous community? The user agreement is an honor system. IMHO only an admission of a rules violation is fact.
Agree. Originally Posted by Mythos
Originally Posted by Champagne Brown
Fuck that. Originally Posted by canihitit
I feel you...but again, Soundwave plays on the thin line of blasphemy and never breaks written rules. Unlike the OUTTING whores around here that fail to understand board rules.
Soundwave aka TheCutepapi , for those unaware of Transformers, not only had read the rules but probably had a whore read it to him and secretly recorded it for when he goes to ECCiE court.
But damn, tell me how you really feel about him lol.
But the real question is, will this whore be banned for making false accusations, even though it was towards the Demon of the Welcome Wagon. Originally Posted by junglemonkey
Seal looking arse can't even comprehend what the rules were back then or show links to backup anything he says... Show the guidelines
Show the facts Seal http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=319022
Originally Posted by Champagne Brown