You know how the scientific method is supposed to work? Someone makes a claim and does the research. They present their research for everyone to challenge and test. If they did it correctly then other scientists will have the same results and no one can argue with the results. Think about gravity.
You start talking about climate change and you get the following; a narrative going back to the 1970s written by leftist socialists who predicted a coming ice age. They wrote verbal checks that they couldn't cash by predicting glaciers in Chicago by 1995. That didn't happen and it was never going to happen. So, in the 1990s it became global warming (because they must have overshot fixing the problem in the 1980s). Then we had such distinguished scientists like Ted Danson of Cheers saying that we only had until 2000 to save the world. Like Y2K, it never happened. So then we got "climate change". Seems safe enough, ambiguous and undefined, anything could be evidence of climate change. Too hot (drought)...climate change, too cold (climate change), too wet (climate change), no discernable change at all...yep, climate change. There is no widely realized scientific evidence that can be proven empirically. I know, you can yell it all you want but the evidence is not there. Like Speedy says, it has to be a source that he accepts and believes or it doesn't count. Trot out that source and show us the numbers. After all, the ancients have known for thousands of years that the weather changes. Climate changes as well. Any botanist can show you the rings in a tree and tell you what happened within the life of that tree. Hell, if you live long enough and haven't lost your mind like Biden then you can remember when you were a kid. I remember 50 years ago when the temperatures in summer were over 100 degrees several days a year. All the grass along the highways turned yellow from lack of water. I got my merit badge in meteorology because I was keeping my own records. You don't see that weather so much today. Nowadays, they panic when the temperature goes over 100 and you never see the yellow highways anymore. Still, some talking head who owes all of his (or her) funding to some liberal think tank is going to tell me not to believe my own eyes.
We're pretty conceited to think that we can change the weather. People like that were considered to be charlatans when they rolled into town with their cannon, dances, and songs claiming that they could make rain.
So to go back to the election results; most courts have refused to look at the results. Not because they don't have proof but because the petitioning party has no standing. Some judges have looked at the evidence in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. Those judges say that there is something there but they are in the minority on the courts. So, I'll say it again; there is more evidence of voter irregularities than there is evidence of a straight election. Some of our own deniers have tacitly admitted that there was problems with the election but they comfort themselves by proclaiming that it wasn't enough to change the outcome of the election. As I also said, if you can't VERIFY the election results how can you know that the election results were correct. You can't.
There is a new tact today, in both the elections and weather the big Tech masters are censoring information that doesn't support what they think it should. Say the wrong word on Youtube and your video gets pulled. Tweet something that challenges the status quo and you're banned. An axis of evil exists between China, Big Tech, and left wing political activists like Soros.
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
Sir, I love this response.
As of now, I am not in my right mind to retort in kind. You might guess I am not of sound mind.
Having stated that, I will do my best to reply with an equal answer.
Until such time, I will have to wallow in my enibriated state after making a life changing decision.
You are most appreciated for your answer. It was indeed gratifying to read what you had to say.
SIR!
It still begs the question: Who the FUCK are you plagiarizing? Forgive me, but this challenge
still seems out of character for you. If I am way off base, then it is my error. Sir.
