For All You Guys That Think All Leaks Come From WK's

So, is this board divided into providers and hobbists or those with dicks and those without? Does that mean the TS providers should also get to post in the ML and get access to the reviews?

Does this shit really matter? If a provider wants to read the ML all she needs to do is roll a new account and pay for the premium access. Atleast Sistine is being open about her actions.

So, is this board divided into providers and hobbists or those with dicks and those without? Does that mean the TS providers should also get to post in the ML and get access to the reviews?

Does this shit really matter? If a provider wants real the ML all she needs to do is roll a new account and pay for the premium access. Atleast Sistine is being open about her actions. Originally Posted by mrhamm

Bravo!

The most frustrating piece to me is that we will penalize the person who is trying to be honest AND fits what the spirit of the rules should be.

Speaking of old twat's. lol Originally Posted by rockerrick

Please.

Let's leave Claire out of this one.

Seems the Mods were doing their job.

I don't think so. I think approving a review should involve reading the ROS and making a determination if it was informative enough...... In this case the ROS contained the needed information to know the writer was a woman and it should not have gotten approved.

The problem lies within who wrote the GL.

Semantics.

There is no distinction being that Men have to be Hobbyist and Women have to be Providers.

A little revision is needed here if it is truly not the intent of the owners. Originally Posted by Precious_b

Too many people are whining about what it SHOULD be and you all need to learn what it IS and accept that you are not changing it unless you buy it.....

I would imagine the MODS are overworked reading RTMS from all those whiners that are clueless as to what an infraction is and missed this.

They are all "volunteers" after all....Between the free pussy and the workload they have no time for coddling the wusses.

It appears that the problem has been corrected and the lady is returned to the status she should remain. As always, ladies are welcome to write reviews of their experiences with providers as well as strippers as someone noted, and post them here in CoEd where everyone can enjoy them.

Although Sistine may want to be the one doing the research, she needs to understand that asking for information that is restricted and actually being provided that information could lead to her being banned as well as the member that provides the information being banned.

IF the "couple" wishes to participate here the husband will need to MAN up and take the lead in the research department. The wife can read the ads and the showcases and present him with options.

In regards to her reading ROS for the information I wonder why no one stopped to consider that the vast majority of reviews of women by men are reviews of women servicing 1 man...... NOT a couple..... How a provider interacts WITH a couple... how that provider approaches the husband or the wife..... is a very unique experience very different from the normal experiences reviewed and one is not going to get an idea of how they are from those reviews....

I don't believe she was asking for anything, Whispers.

I believe that she posted a review and was granted Premium Access, erroneously.
That's not on her, hence; there's absolutely no reason she should be punished or reprimanded in any form or fashion.


The guidelines clearly state that there are specific, gender-based areas, and apparently, the "mistake", has been corrected


That said, I don't see what the big deal is here. I really don't.

She's a woman and part of a couple, and
she's contributing to the site by visiting Verified Eccie Providers,
and posting reviews on Eccie,...

Why should she not be granted Premium Access?


--If you're going to try the gender approach, (because she's a woman), don't.

Why? Because the "men" act like bigger bitches around here than the ladies.
In fact, some of these ladies have bigger balls than a lot of the "men".

--If you're going to use the Privacy (so we can discuss things more freely),reason, don't.

Why? See previous answer; which further proves the point.

--I've always been the type who won't say anything about someone that I wouldn't say to that someone. It never fails to bring a chuckle whenever I see someone post something as a Billy Bad Ass in "Private", only to suck-up and tuck-tail out in the public eye.

Which brings us back to that answer proving the point.


The Locker Room absolutely hemorrhages information, so for anyone to believe that anything said in there is, indeed, "private", is a dupe.



So again, the question remains...

Reasons pro;

-She is a hobbyist in every sense of the word.
-She would use PA as a hobbyist; to assist in making informed decisions.
-She is a contributing Eccie member.
----She visits with Verified Eccie Providers.
----She contributes to the Eccie database by posting reviews.
-She has been candid and up-front in her approach to all of this
-She can easily access that information if she so desired, anyway...so it's not as if this is going to prevent her from seeing anything anyway.

against;
--she is a woman.

.....................

--Why shouldn't she be granted premium access?
Is there really any harm that could come from allowing her PA?


Seriously, let's hear your arguments..

.

.

Thank you. That was a very informative link, and it led to some other interesting reading about Ricky. You are correct, this does not seem to be a recent affliction of his. I guess some reach a certain maturity level and plateau out.

But I find another interesting thing as well.

For all his mantra that it is "all about the men", he does seem to get very protective about Guinevere. I never met the lady, and I am making NO implication about her, but for omeone (Rick) who seems to believe women should be seen and not heard does seem to verge on putting on the suit of armor for her. I personally see nothing really wrong about that, but it does seem incongruous with many of his verbalized positions.

The world is truly a strange place, especially the humanoids who inhabit it.

Again, thanks.

Originally Posted by Old-T

So slooow you are..........
Most know the reason, well except you obviously.
And it's not he does, it's he did.
You didn't understand my post after cb's. lol

But of course you are incapable of staying on topic in a thread.

For all you retards that keep questioning why a female cannot have premium access and the wording of the guidelines specificity:


Premium Access enables members to view "The Rest of the Story" (ROS) content within reviews which is not available to guests to the site, registered members, or our female members. You will also be able to make and view "Private" posts in our public forums as well as have access to additional "Premium Access Only" forums...such as the Men's Lounge. Premium Access also includes an increased Private Messaging (PM) capacity, from 50 message limit for basic membership to 1,000 messages for Premium Access members. This prevents unnecessary deletion of messages and allows for creation of custom folders, organization, and message archiving.

Premium Access can be obtained by choosing one of our affordable payment options, or by actively contributing to site content with reviews. Each approved review posted will earn 6 weeks of Premium Access credit. This credit will continue to accumulate for as long as the member continues to post reviews. When requesting credit for a review submission, please include the URL link to your review(s). Inquiries may be sent to your local mod team.

Elite VIP Member Upgrade This is a one-time permanent upgrade to your current account. This upgrade entitles members access to our private male forums, access to ROS within reviews, private post capability, and expanded PM capacity (5,000)

Subscription Options include:

2-week pass $20
1 month $40
3 months $60
6 months $80
12 months $100
Elite VIP Member Upgrade $250



IMPORTANT: Premium Access is ONLY available to our male members. Do not attempt to purchase Premium Access for a female account


It is very clear that a female account may not have premium access!

Still with the insults, rick?

I clearly stated that the guidelines reflected that and did so in a respectful manner.

However, my question remains, what's the big deal and why does it bother you so much if a female hobbyist has Premium Access?
You know, besides the "because them'z the rulez', reason.

Why does that bother YOU so much, is the question?

.

.

Since you put it that way I'll tone it back.

The big deal is the owners of the site said NO!
You were one who liked pointing out all my handles, what was the big deal there? Was it hurting you or anyone else?
The reason it bothers me is the same reason that hookers that PM guys with the knowledge of privately tagged info get banned, they aren't supposed to be reading it.
It was privately posted and I should not have been questioned about my comment.
In this particular incidence it was not her doing but that of staff.

But I find another interesting thing as well.

For all his mantra that it is "all about the men", he does seem to get very protective about Guinevere. I never met the lady, and I am making NO implication about her, but for someone (Rick) who seems to believe women should be seen and not heard does seem to verge on putting on the suit of armor for her. I personally see nothing really wrong about that, but it does seem incongruous with many of his verbalized positions. Originally Posted by Old-T

Ricki and SG seem to have fallen out since he was WKing for her in that SA Coed thread I lincked. Maybe it caused him to join the Women Haters Club.

Ricki'll never get to enjoy the unlimited free modtard pussy he so obviously covets, if he keeps up with the intemperate language.

I don't believe she was asking for anything, Whispers.

I was addressing others, not her for the most part.

I believe that she posted a review and was granted Premium Access, erroneously.

Yes. She was. That's been known from the start.

That's not on her, hence; there's absolutely no reason she should be punished or reprimanded in any form or fashion.

She hasn't.

The guidelines clearly state that there are specific, gender-based areas, and apparently, the "mistake", has been corrected

That said, I don't see what the big deal is here. I really don't.

She's a woman and part of a couple, and
she's contributing to the site by visiting Verified Eccie Providers,
and posting reviews on Eccie,...

Why should she not be granted Premium Access?

And if she is not? IF it is just another attempt by a whore to game the system?
What if each whore that wanted the access claimed they were part of a couple and write a review?


--If you're going to try the gender approach, (because she's a woman), don't.

Why? Because the "men" act like bigger bitches around here than the ladies.
In fact, some of these ladies have bigger balls than a lot of the "men".

--If you're going to use the Privacy (so we can discuss things more freely),reason, don't.

Why? See previous answer; which further proves the point.

--I've always been the type who won't say anything about someone that I wouldn't say to that someone. It never fails to bring a chuckle whenever I see someone post something as a Billy Bad Ass in "Private", only to suck-up and tuck-tail out in the public eye.

Which brings us back to that answer proving the point.


The Locker Room absolutely hemorrhages information, so for anyone to believe that anything said in there is, indeed, "private", is a dupe.

So again, the question remains...

Reasons pro;

-She is a hobbyist in every sense of the word. You know this how?
-She would use PA as a hobbyist; to assist in making informed decisions.
-She is a contributing Eccie member.
----She visits with Verified Eccie Providers.
----She contributes to the Eccie database by posting reviews.
-She has been candid and up-front in her approach to all of this
-She can easily access that information if she so desired, anyway...so it's not as if this is going to prevent her from seeing anything anyway.

against;
--she is a woman.

.....................

--Why shouldn't she be granted premium access?
Is there really any harm that could come from allowing her PA?

Seriously, let's hear your arguments..

Originally Posted by SofaKingFun

If the Owners wanted to invest in the programming to create a new class that gain access to review material in ROS and still be excluded from the locker rooms and material in private tags I would have no issue with it.

If the whores could regularly read the ROS we would have far more entertaining drama in CoEd as they started thread after thread of rebuttals. Some might read and improve their game.

The participation of women in a forum changes the manner in which men post and interact with each other bringing out that wussified manner in which men put on a show for the ladies in an attempt to get attention.

You don't see countless numbers of "Let's be nice" threads and hijackings in the locker room when subject matter might be offensive to a whore because it gets them no where.

Ricki and SG seem to have fallen out since he was WKing for her in that SA Coed thread I lincked. Maybe it caused him to join the Women Haters Club.

Ricki'll never get to enjoy the unlimited free modtard pussy he so obviously covets, if he keeps up with the intemperate language. Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Shows what you know, I'm capable of doing it without a modtards status

Since everyone here is so knowledgable .. I was curious since I will be deactivating my account since it will now be pointless and useless.. IF my husband were to create an account could the 2 reviews I posted be reposted onto his account considering they are new reviews and worth PA that I wasn't allowed being a female .. Is that an option or no?
Also IF he created a profile could I still write the reviews for him to copy and paste into the ROS area or would that not be permitted either...
Wouldn't want to rustle anyone's feathers here seeing as that was never my intent ever..

Heck, he could even "adopt" your handle (and keep the avatar) without there being a bar to simply changing the gender and somehow certifying to the staff that it is he and not thee.

Probably easier for him to just register a new handle, but there would be IP implications and maybe altercations if you both share the same ISP, for example.

otoh, what happens off line -- meaning who knows who is contributing to a review in the creative stage, and then HE could make the post.

Better yet, you continue to post reviews (in the coed forum) and/or simply link those to his ... all of us I think would benefit from dual gender point of view reviews.

He could also -- were you to draft your own review -- insert that into his review, with attribution, of course.

Y'all should also consider photography during sessions!

Many ways to skin a cat (or a c*ck) ....