Yertle the Turtle on the upcoming SCOTUS nomination

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven..._9341258.html?
http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/e...e62786407.html Originally Posted by i'va biggen

. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/nom.../supreme-court



Keep running in circles hamster. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You'd be the dumb jackass spinning your wheel that hasn't cited where in the Constitution it dictates or prescribes a timeline for Congress to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You are the retarded chimpazoid who hasn't cited where the constitution states the people will vote on a SOCTUS nominee .Like the turtle wants. Keep on running hamster.
Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, would be the dumb jackass spinning your wheel becuase you're to fuckin' stupid to understand how it's the Senate that is responsible for confirming a judicial nominee, and you'd be the chicken-shit jackass who hasn't cited where in the Constitution it dictates or prescribes a timeline for Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You are the chimpazoid parroting the same shit over, and over plus dodging the statement about people voting for the nominee. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Repeating the facts to you until you thoroughly understand is necessary because you're such a fucking idiot, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. To meaningfully support your POV your stupid-ass has to cite where in the Constitution it dictates or prescribes a timeline for Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Meanwhile, all of your bird brained posts with hamster wheels only serves to underscore your complete lack of intelligence and inability to substantively support your POV with irrefutable factual statements, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You have no facts, just parroting the same shit, because you are in a corner. There is a need for pics when dealing with a trumpazoid.


That is your problem chicken dick. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

The substantive proof is where the Constitution states that the Senate must confirm a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, but it doesn't dictate or prescribe a timeline for the Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp ... as you so ignorantly insist. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

"Independent" LittleEva always sides with Obama. Makes you wonder how "independent" he truly is. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy