I guess you are ignoring the part where Romney has not claimed that the video was altered as a whole itself. There are no delusions when my opinions are based of facts and words that come from Mitt Romney's own mouth and the statements his campaign team have made. How are your opinions made?
But then again you pick and choose what you want to hear, the fact that the video has not been accused of being altered as a whole means nothing to you. The only thing that the Romney's campaign has had an issue with a clip released about the Middle East Peace Negotiations and have no issue with the entire video of the fundraiser.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/...ed-136052.html
That is all the proof I need, the Romney campaign released a statement where they claimed Politico's Dylan Byers had debunked the Romney video, when Dylan Byers responded to the campaigns claims, campaign comes out with a statement they they only have a problem with one clip and the the whole video itself.
So there you go, not one person denies that Romney's ideas in the fully released videos had been altered in anyway.
So as I said before when Romney comes out and says the video is altered or there is solid proof of post production edits- you have nothing to base your claims on.
No where is your proof that anything in the video has been altered, any changes in the continuity? Do you have claims that he was dubbed over? Any claims that the video has been diced and spliced within an inch of it's life? I haven't seen a single iota of proof that would prove otherwise.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1898706.html
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/...le-135995.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWjE...endscreen&NR=1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWjE...ailpage#t=288s The exact time he responds to whether he is backing away from any of the statements in the video.
His response where he stands by his comments made in his video, never ever does Romney himself say that the whole video been altered. So IB show me what ya got? An official statement from his campaign team claiming the whole video was altered would be a good start.
Originally Posted by SkylarCruzWantsYou
As demonstrated earlier, no one needs to claim the whole video was altered to change the message imparted in the video. It takes less than a second to do that. Mother Jones released edited, editorialized and out of context videos. Mother Jones was forced to admit that, you still pretend it didn’t happen or that it doesn’t matter. It did happen and it does matter because Kool Aid swilling Dims accept it as the gospel truth.
Maybe Romney answer was “inelegant” only because Mother Jones didn’t disclose that part of tape was missing by William A. Jacobson
. . . . It is impossible for us to know if Romney said something which changed or put the remarks in context. Romney doesn’t remember the event except for what exists on audio/video. Maybe in the fullness of the answer, the answer was less “inelegant” than it appears. . . .
http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09...e-was-missing/
Critical audio gap in “complete” Romney tape released by Mother Jones (Update – Corn responds, 1-2 minutes missing)
[Corn lies again hoping to perpetuate the first lie:]
[Corn backpedals:]
"According to the source, the recording device inadvertently turned off. The source noticed this quickly and turned it back one. The source estimates that one to two minutes, maybe less, of recording was missed."
http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09...-mother-jones/
Mother Jones, the left-wing magazine that released a controversial video of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney's remarks to a fundraiser in May, now admits that it has no full tape of what Romney said, and that its video is missing "one to two minutes" at the most important moment.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journal...or-Two-Minutes
Technically, Romney said peace was possible By DYLAN BYERS
"At controversial fundraiser, Romney says Middle East peace isn't possible," CBS News's Political Hotsheet reported in its online headline. "Romney: ‘No Way’ There Will Be Israeli-Palestinian Peace," read ABC News's headline. "Romney Told Donors ‘No Way’ on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Accord," Bloomberg reported.
In fact, Romney does think a certain peace is possible — albeit not through the oft-proposed channels — and said as much at the fundraiser. But the clip initially provided by Mother Jones does not include that part of his remarks, and therefore was not reported by the aforementioned news outlets.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/...le-135995.html
The most talked about footage shows Romney speaking about the ongoing tensions in the Middle East. While Romney admits being divided about how the issue of a two-state solution should be handled,
Mother Jones presents the clip in a very singular, albeit questionable, way.
“He discussed various foreign policy positions, sharing views that he does not express in public, including his belief that peace in the Middle East is not possible and a Palestinian state is not feasible,” Mother Jones wrote on Tuesday.
The outlet explained that Romney’s comments about the situation in the Middle East came after someone at the dinner asked how the “Palestinian problem” could be solved.
Mother Jones framed the candidate’s response as follows:” Romney immediately launched into a detailed reply, asserting that the Palestinians have ‘no interest whatsoever in establishing peace, and that the pathway to peace is almost unthinkable to accomplish.’”
But this isn’t exactly how the statements were uttered.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/new-...he-full-story/
When 'Mother Jones' Opposed 'Selectively Edited' Video 'Reported Uncritically By the Media' By John Nolte
So what do we know?
1. The left-wing David Corn at the left-wing "Mother Jones" released selective portions of hidden video taken without Mitt Romney's knowledge at a fundraiser this spring.
2. The corrupt media (who hate when James O'Keefe releases secret video) ran and are still running with the video, hoping to turn it onto the silver bullet that will finally and forever kill Mitt Romney's campaign.
3. That Mitt Romney asked that the full unedited video be released.
4. That David Corn and "Mother Jones" agreed to release the full unedited video.
5. That David Corn and "Mother Jones" claimed to have released the full unedited video.
6. That David Corn and "Mother Jones" lied when they said they had released the full unedited video.
7. That somewhere around two minutes of the video is missing, and that in the wildest of wild coincidences, the missing minutes just happen to occur around the portion of the video the media are claiming is the most damaging to Romney -- the portion about the 47%.
8. That "Mother Jones" and David Corn not only lied but that, as an institution -- as this editorial from March of last year makes clear -- "Mother Jones" is filled with wild-eyed hypocrites:
To the list of journalism's greatest disgraces, let us now add James O'Keefe. O'Keefe calls himself an investigative reporter, though as far as we can tell the only group of journalists he has anything in common with are habitual fabricators like Jayson Blair, Stephen Glass, and Janet Cooke.
But that's not the scandal we're talking about. The real scandal is that—even though by the time he posted a "sting" of a top NPR fundraiser, O'Keefe was notorious for creating deceptive video smear jobs (ACORN? Hello?)—the media repeated the allegations uncritically.
9. That James O'Keefe eventually released the full unedited NPR video.
10. That as of this writing "Mother Jones" still hasn't released or detailed what is missing from their still selectively edited video -- you know, the missing portion that by some wild coincidence occurs during the portion of the video David Corn, "Mother Jones," and the ObamaMedia say is the most damaging.
To be frank, I don’t believe David Corn or "Mother Jones." I think the missing minutes are mitigating and might even show Romney in a good light; might even show him clarifying his remarks. There's a reason Corn and "Mother Jones" tried to get away with passing off the edited video as unedited, and this is the only reason that makes any sense.
Frankly, I also don’t believe Corn and "Mother Jones" when they claim to not have access to the missing minutes or any idea what occurred during those missing minutes. That this strange edit happens during the portion of the tape Corn and "Mother Jones" are using to beat Romney senseless is just too coincidental for my taste.
Why should we believe anything Corn and "Mother Jones" say after they attempted to pass off edited video as unedited?
Why should we believe anything Corn and "Mother Jones" say when they trash James O'Keefe's hidden video tactics but refuse to live up to his standards of releasing the full unedited video?
We certainly can't expect Romney to remember what he said. After a while all of these fundraisers become a blur. But maybe some of the people who attended the fundraiser remember?
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journal...y-edited-tapes
Originally Posted by bigtex