It is fact....Sept 9 the GOP became aware of whistleblowerIt’s a fact Trump already gave them leathal weapons. Obama gave them blankets.
On Sept 11th Trump gives over funds.
So Trump's blackmail basically backfired.
Originally Posted by WTF
And before that date the POTUS was collaborating with the Russians to undermine a fair election.The time line doesn't support your lie. The DNC was hacked before Trump ever became the Republican candidate for president -- before Trump made that remark. You keep lying and claiming Trump was the Russian candidate, but your lying ass has yet to produce a smidgen of evidence that the Russians helped Trump beat 17 Republican contenders.
And I can prove what I just stated. He asked, and the Russian trolls obliged. Can you prove the whistleblower and Schiff worked together? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
Biden acted inappropriately? Your opinion backed up by no one.My opinion backed up by evidence and confirmed by many:
I never said the Russian interference had a major impact on the 2016 elections. No, the Russian interference did not change any votes at the polls but the Russian interference could have changed the opinions of voters prior to the voters casting their votes.
https://www.npr.org/2019/04/18/71481...dential-electi Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
The time line doesn't support your lie. The DNC was hacked before Trump ever became the Republican candidate for president -- before Trump made that remark. You keep lying and claiming Trump was the Russian candidate, but your lying ass has yet to produce a smidgen of evidence that the Russians helped Trump beat 17 Republican contenders. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
It’s a fact Trump already gave them lethal weapons. Obama gave them blankets. Originally Posted by bambino
check your PM's
thank you valued poster! Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
In summary, regarding the instant matter, the whistleblower submitted the appropriate Disclosure of Urgent Concern form that was in effect as of August 12, 2019, and had been used by the ICIG since May 24, 2018. The whistleblower stated on the form that he or she possessed both first-hand and other information. The ICIG reviewed the information provided as well as other information gathered and determined that the complaint was both urgent and that it appeared credible. From the moment the ICIG received the whistleblower’s filing, the ICIG has worked to effectuate Congress’s intent, and the whistleblower’s intent, within the rule of law. The ICIG will continue in those efforts on behalf of all whistleblowers in the Intelligence Community.
Trump has harshly criticized the whistleblower, saying, “That person’s a spy in my opinion,” and he has falsely argued the whistleblower’s claims were inaccurate. And while Trump acknowledged whistleblowers should be protected, he added the caveat “if the whistleblower is legitimate.”By ZEKE MILLER/AP
In one tweet, Trump asked, “Who is this so-called ‘whistleblower’ who doesn’t know the correct facts. Is he on our Country’s side. Where does he come from.”
Check your PMS
By ZEKE MILLER/AP
Who's side are you on? Intelligence? Or the guy who attacks our own military? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
i find it amusing and appalling at the same time that a radical socialist like yourself puts blind faith the Military Industrial Complex that has repeatedly lied about spying on US citizens due solely to your hatred of the sitting US President. have you no morals? are you that naive?
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Have you ever been asked to take and uphold an oath. Girl scouts maybe? I love your Thin Mints. As thin as your skin. This president even attacks POW veterans. He is unworthy of the office.
The military oath of enlistment (re-enlistment) is fairly straightforward for most military personnel. It's administered by a superior officer, and carried out like most traditional oaths, with the officer reading the oath and the person being sworn repeating it.
I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
the spies are spying on you and yet you are willing to believe their treason because it suits your traitorous agenda yet you despise America. you sir are a bag of confused cats. Originally Posted by The_Waco_KidFirst, thank you for the "sir". I know we can get a bit surly at times, but that's just the Texan talking. And maybe the Whiskey or Tequila.
It's pretty astounding that your kind still call it "blind faith" when all the evidence is there. Even with a confession. That's what I find appalling and amusing. You and the rancorous one are very quick to jump to conclusions and delusions when you state phrases such as Military Industrial Complex.
It's doesn't take a blind man to be led by some big, deep state body to see. See what? Let's go to the tape:
Ask and you shall receive. Rancky wants evidence? How about the meetimg in "the" tower:
You ask if I have morals? You say it's "due solely to [my] hatred of the sitting U.S. President"? I am not that naive. I swore an oath. I continue to uphold it. Keep asking me to check my PMs, I'll keep upholding the first. I still have not been checked on my mockery of you.
Have you ever been asked to take and uphold an oath. Girl scouts maybe? I love your Thin Mints. As thin as your skin. This president even attacks POW veterans. He is unworthy of the office.
Have you no shame? Put it together. It's finally coming to an end. Face it. Of course, in the course of the hearings, the weakness will be Michael Cohen.
First, thank you for the "sir". I know we can get a bit surly at times, but that's just the Texan talking. And maybe the Whiskey or Tequila.
I guess you mean, by this, that the CIA are the traitors? I beleive them "because it suits [my] traitorous agenda yet [I] despise America"? "Is that what your saying?" To quote your UT hussy neighbor. You're all fucked up here. You don't make any sense.
I beleive the evidence. I beleive the Lieutenant Colonel. Your kind will discredit him because he was born in Kyev. Quick to discredit him like the president discredits an American judge just because he's of Mexican descent. How impudent, petulant and shameless is that? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
My opinion backed up by evidence and confirmed by many:The video proves nothing. No proof the the action Joe Biden took was to help out his son in any way.
You used the term "interference", not meddling. "Could have" but it didn't. Keep crawfishing. Those ads bought before the election were amateurish and not well broadcasted. There are old threads in the forum dedicated to this topic.
Keep mumbling your bullshit. Originally Posted by gnadfly
Allegations That Clinton Campaign Funded Trump-Russia Research Still Pending At Now-Closed FECYou should actually take the time to read and UNDERSTAND the posts of others. I clearly stated that Clinton may have paid for information but I also stated there is no proof she asked for FAKE information.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/legalne.../#5aab1a6a3d99
Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/40...dossier-before
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...bb9_story.html
Clinton Campaign and Democratic Party Helped Pay for Russia Trump Dossier
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/24/u...a-dossier.html
thank you ridiculous poster! Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
You asked the fucking question about what Russia did in the 2016 election, but like a typical lib-retard you stick your head up your ass and ignore that hildebeest's Steele Dossier was top to bottom a Putin product of disinformation that hildebeest and the lame-stream media bottle fed to her "#Grubered" minions. Originally Posted by I B HankeringStart a new thread. This thread is about whether or not Joe Biden withholding payment to the Ukraine was done to help out his son Hunter.
My opinion backed up by evidence and confirmed by many:There were "Russian" paid ads and protesters for and against both sides. Some people have a misunderstanding and lack of knowledge with respect to "counter-operations" with dirty tricks. Locally it starts with tearing one's own campaign posters down.
You used the term "interference", not meddling. "Could have" but it didn't. Keep crawfishing. Those ads bought before the election were amateurish and not well broadcasted. There are old threads in the forum dedicated to this topic.
Keep mumbling your bullshit. Originally Posted by gnadfly