ecCie .... this bullshit is getting really old ... really fast Directed at Moderators

...Hey OBSG, what would be some of those conditions? better yet, how do you know what those conditions are and if they even exist? ...
Originally Posted by davidfree986

Well, David, Bigdog0311, NearhauteRed, etc, (not sure how many handles you have been banned under now) since you asked:

The fact you are still here shows the mods use a light hand when it comes to pointing. I am sure people like yourself, Wulf, Tara, and a few others who have a long history of bad behavior get shown less tolerance than those who occasionally slip up and break a guideline. The mods have no desire to point or ban anyone. They use the tools they have, which includes those items, to try to herd all the cats here. They also use PM warnings and sometime verbal public warnings to try to control out of hand situations with out having to resort to harsher ways.

Just because Wulf or you get a public calling out does not mean its only for your benefit. Sometimes that is used to point out to others as well that specific behavior will not be tolerated. Sometimes others heed the implied warning and stop. Sometimes they do not.

Oh, and I did give 2 examples in the post of mine you quoted. But I can understand why you would ignore those specific examples.

And when cry babies like you constantly hit the RTM every time you THINK someone has violated a guideline does not mean the mods will agree any action is needed. You can be your own worst enemy by over using the RTM or crying about every perceived slight you get.

As has been pointed out, you have no way of knowing what action has been taken behind the scene, if any. If someone continues to break the guidelines to degree they receive points, they will eventually get banned. But you know that part very well yourself as you have been banned under your current handle at least twice if not more in addition to all the bans under your prior handles.

With the exception of nuclear offenses, the point system allows folks to be on an adult board, be able to speak their minds, even behave badly from time to time yet allow the staff to monitor their behavior and curb the milder infractions without having to start wholesale bans which would not be good for the board. is it perfect? Are the volunteer mods perfect? Are even the guidelines perfect? Of course not. But they do a damn good job for no pay. I have from time to time disagreed with their actions and I tell them so. But I always have a lot of respect for them doing a thankless job and overall, they do a damn good job.

You know, I find the OP attractive and her quirkiness somewhat intriguing. However, I'm probably not contacting her any time soon due to historical information I have a hard time getting past.

That said, I think that recently, it seems she's been making an effort to be more under control. And I absolutely see her point. In the last thread, she was merely responding to very thinly veiled sarcastic and abusive language from another provider who is a bully but (mainly) skirts within the rules yet provokes and bullies many around here. And while it may be true that we don't know what the modtards do behind the scenes, it was evident a certain one had no issue warning the OP in public, but not the instigator.

I'm sure that can be frustrating. It's like the football player who gets flagged for retaliating. By no means am I saying the OP is innocent, but what I am saying is that it seems like she's trying to be better on the boards, and there appear to be other providers who need to spend more time fucking and less time stalking. The obsession is getting annoying by this third party bystander.

You know, I find the OP attractive and her quirkiness somewhat intriguing. However, I'm probably not contacting her any time soon due to historical information I have a hard time getting past.

That said, I think that recently, it seems she's been making an effort to be more under control. And I absolutely see her point. In the last thread, she was merely responding to very thinly veiled sarcastic and abusive language from another provider who is a bully but (mainly) skirts within the rules yet provokes and bullies many around here. And while it may be true that we don't know what the modtards do behind the scenes, it was evident a certain one had no issue warning the OP in public, but not the instigator.

I'm sure that can be frustrating. It's like the football player who gets flagged for retaliating. By no means am I saying the OP is innocent, but what I am saying is that it seems like she's trying to be better on the boards, and there appear to be other providers who need to spend more time fucking and less time stalking. The obsession is getting annoying by this third party bystander. Originally Posted by Barrymccockinner

I'll buy your next session if you can show where I have bullied or stalked her.

Damn some of you guys need to go back to school and learn how to read. If a whore can read better than you, consider it a sign from the almighty.

Sweetie, if you want me to stop responding to you then stop asking me questions. Originally Posted by thathottnurse

..... that... doesn't make since....

...

And just as THN did above, he also did the obvious board violations, even the same guideline numbers 1 & 4, but saying it indirectly and not naming handles (at least in the above post), causing it to fall into that gray category.
Originally Posted by davidfree986

And bigdog, you are the master of this. Almost every post you make has some vailed reference to one or more of mean people you are always complaining about. god only knows how many points you would have if you did not do this exact thing so well. so don't go complaining because others have learned to do it as well.

I'll buy your next session if you can show where I have bullied or stalked her.

Damn some of you guys need to go back to school and learn how to read. If a whore can read better than you, consider it a sign from the almighty. Originally Posted by thathottnurse

When did I say it was you I was talking about? And I don't need my sessions paid, comp'd or otherwise reduced, thank you very much. You know what happens when you assume? It tells others how guilty you feel about the subject, but I digress.

Some whores need to stick to the business of insulting other providers and stop insulting the johns that support them. Better yet, stick to the business of whoring. They also need to stop always wanting to have the last word on everything. If a client wanted someone who always has to have the last word, they'd go to their mother-in-laws.

Hay now!! My mother in law always lets me have the last word. As long as I am in the car on the way home from her house

When did I say it was you I was talking about? And I don't need my sessions paid, comp'd or otherwise reduced, thank you very much. You know what happens when you assume? It tells others how guilty you feel about the subject, but I digress.

Some whores need to stick to the business of insulting other providers and stop insulting the johns that support them. Better yet, stick to the business of whoring. They also need to stop always wanting to have the last word on everything. If a client wanted someone who always has to have the last word, they'd go to their mother-in-laws. Originally Posted by Barrymccockinner

Heh. Okay hon, I'll still buy your next session if you can show where any provider was bullying or stalking the OP.


*crickets*


*crickets*


Only dumbasses think that a whore gets the last word on a whoreboard.

Floor's yours....

Wait, so you'll concede a point if someone can prove that an otherwise subjective and variable (depending on point of view) activity has taken place? Okay, who sets the definition? Is there an arbitrating third party? What's the degree to which sufficient proof has been provided to support the point?

I'm not saying anyone has bullied or picked on her from what I've seen (but several of y'all are picking on her for whatever baggage you have together). But shit, your challenge sounds rigged from the get-go. It's easy to challenge with confidence when the odds of changing one's subjective opinion regarding a personal beef are worse than the state lottery.

Or are you going to say that neither you nor anyone else of note has been knowingly picking on her? Don't worry, I get that you're bored or were just blowing off steam or you're just frustrated with her because of drama history I give very few fucks over. Also, I get that she's a bag of wet cats in just this thread alone, I doubt there's much argument there. But without going nuclear option and bringing out accusations of stalking and bullying (which, again, yes I know she did), can you at least admit that you've been intentionally provoking for the sake of provocation?

I ain't asking for a free session. I'm just asking for a little less passive aggression.

Heh. Okay hon, I'll still buy your next session if you can show where any provider was bullying or stalking the OP.

*crickets*

*crickets*

Only dumbasses think that a whore gets the last word on a whoreboard.

Floor's yours.... Originally Posted by thathottnurse

Can I get that offer ? My hobby cost in DFW is starting to hurt my income...
Can some one bully or stalk OP?
So I can get free session ? wait this is session with THN, right?
This poor boy from DC can use a free session with Hot Nurse....and she can teach me to read also...

Wait, so you'll concede a point if someone can prove that an otherwise subjective and variable (depending on point of view) activity has taken place? Okay, who sets the definition? Is there an arbitrating third party? What's the degree to which sufficient proof has been provided to support the point?

I'm not saying anyone has bullied or picked on her from what I've seen (but several of y'all are picking on her for whatever baggage you have together). But shit, your challenge sounds rigged from the get-go. It's easy to challenge with confidence when the odds of changing one's subjective opinion regarding a personal beef are worse than the state lottery.

Or are you going to say that neither you nor anyone else of note has been knowingly picking on her? Don't worry, I get that you're bored or were just blowing off steam or you're just frustrated with her because of drama history I give very few fucks over. Also, I get that she's a bag of wet cats in just this thread alone, I doubt there's much argument there. But without going nuclear option and bringing out accusations of stalking and bullying (which, again, yes I know she did), can you at least admit that you've been intentionally provoking for the sake of provocation?

I ain't asking for a free session. I'm just asking for a little less passive aggression. Originally Posted by jdkees

How is she being picked on?

Please define" Picked on".

WP has been on and off the board many times. She violates enough of the rules to get banned. Then, when is allowed back on, she starts with how sorry she is and this time will be different. Then she goes right back to her prior behavior and gets banned again. And repeat. And repeat. So forgive many on here for not buying in to her latest iteration. She already is doing the same things she did before. Posting the same stuff as before. Causing the same drama as before. And each time, someone decides to champion her cause. How bad we are treating her. Till she gets banned again.

WP, you CAN change, if you really want to. Time and again, mods and others give you advice on how to become a better accepted member of the community and avoid the mistakes that get you banned. Time and again, people reach out to you to help. But nothing changes. You revert to the same old posting and acting just like the last however many times. How many bridges can be left after all you have burned?

It will take a lot of hard work and constant behavior to change peoples minds about you. It can be done but its so hard given the baggage you bring with you. But you, like the member you chose to show support for in your first post never seem to do so. It is entirely in your control

And if someone considers what I said as picking on anyone, go suck an egg.

How is she being picked on? Originally Posted by thathottnurse

You ever hear the term 'gaslighting'?

I'll just reiterate what I've already said: can you at least admit that you've been intentionally provoking for the sake of provocation?

FAIR WARNING: If exposition isn't your thing scroll down to LONG STORY SHORT

It's not like you aren't aware of it. You even admit that there's a chance you can get infracted on from it:

This crybaby stuff gets funnier everyday.

Hey mods, I'd like my points with a side of pineapple flavored jizz please? Thancks

Edit: actually you can just drizzle it over the top. Originally Posted by thathottnurse

Or you were again making light at her expense (which is still picking on her and not really any other practical use).

I get it, you kinda have to backpedal into saying that you've been making legitimate criticisms and honest, heartfelt suggestions. But come on, do you really think your responses to her are doing anything but continuing a pointless game of "who can throw the most shade with the least amount of work"? Frankly, I don't take you as that naive and estimate you're plenty smart enough to know the difference.

Don't get me wrong: if your goal was instead to turn off guys like me by allowing her to shine up her Dramanation, then congrats. Mission accomplished. If that's not your intention here, then allow me to be the first to let you know that commentaries like this in the middle of an argument:

If you hadn't already fucked your reputation as a clean, safe and reputable provider then I would suggest contacting an *established* legit agency. As it stands now, any reputable agency owner wouldn't come near you even if you shat little shiny gold coins every hour on the hour. Why would any smart business owner associate themselves with someone who can even control what they say, especially in this industry? Originally Posted by thathottnurse

... That's some pretty heavy shade. It might even be 100% accurate shade, so I'm not calling your facts or any potential polling data into question. I'm not saying that I'm taking your comment here as the only data point influencing my interest, but you had to know it plays a role and you mashed that proverbial button on her pretty constantly through that other thread, and you're still making sure to toss some passive aggressive barbs of that sort her way.

Is that necessarily hurting her business? She likely cares fuck-all about my degree of interest at this point, particularly after my last couple of comments. Then there's the fact that I'm a bit of a snarky ass, which chaps at least a few others from time to time (and it keeps me warm at night, I won't lie). So I won't speculate that this means anything beyond a goose egg to her bottom line. But I just happen to be one of the vocal-- and sexy, in that dumpy-and-average-yet-handsome sort of way (honest, ask anyone)-- individuals, and there are tons of other lurkers who might not comment at all yet have been similarly influenced. I mentioned elsewhere (or was it here?) that I feel the Coed Discussions area should be renamed Geico, and it's highly doubtful that I'm the only one who feels this way.

But hey, I've digressed enough and I don't have the breast implants to get the guys to tell me how intelligent and thoughtful I am. So...

LONG STORY SHORT

I fully expect and understand you saying that you mean no ill will or harm, and that you're 'just being honest' or some similar cliche. But if you say that you're completely unaware of how you're using at least a bit of social authority (status? reputation?) to belittle and dress her down to a very strong effect, then I'm going to have to say you're being disingenuous. I only have your posts to go on because we've never chatted in person, but I just don't take you for being that oblivious. You may say you're not picking on her, but as I said before the definitions get all fuzzy and interpretive, especially if you get to be the arbiter.

You've already been clear you believe she's a hot mess that doesn't manage herself well (among other opinions). What's left to go on about? Ask yourself what your motivation is, and be okay if the answer is "because it's funny/entertaining/cathartic." Because at this point that's what the answer sure looks like from the perspective of someone who doesn't know either of you.

.

Also, you folks seem to talk about baggage with her like it's just her carrying the baggage. There are plenty of you who are still hanging on to some baggage regarding her, that much is obvious. No idea if it's warranted or not, and I don't much care. But the pretense that it's just her carrying baggage in this case is absurd and lacking in self-honesty.

Very well said, jdkees. I agree. A lot of unnecessary shade being cast on fair Catherine. [/no sarcasm]