Before the myth sets in: Romney was right, Crowley was wrong, and Obama lied

.. and shit happens. Obaminable lied. Shit happens.

Bidenoxious lied. Shit happens.

Candy had her Dan Rather moment. Shit happens.

Hillary shot herself in both feet. Shit happens. Originally Posted by LexusLover

There has been more oil and natural production on private lands than in federally controlled areas. So Romney is correct in pointing out an imbalance.
But it is an overstatement to say that "all of the increase" has been on private lands -- since, by definition, new permits and licenses have been granted for federal lands (bringing in more gas and oil).
Romney's claim that Obama's administration has "cut the number of permits and licenses in half" for federal lands is also not on the mark.
True, there has been a significant drop -- one tied, in part, to the unprecedented Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Yet the actual numbers of permits and licenses haven't been "cut ... in half." As mentioned above (and including data from part of the Bush administration), there has been a 42% decrease in leases and 37% decrease in drilling permits -- not 50%, as Romney implied.
Even the Institute for Energy Research acknowledged that "this decrease isn't a result of President Obama's policies exclusively, but it is the result of decades and policies that have systematically reduced energy production on federal lands."

.. and shit happens. Obaminable lied. Shit happens.

Bidenoxious lied. Shit happens.

Candy had her Dan Rather moment. Shit happens.

Hillary shot herself in both feet. Shit happens. Originally Posted by LexusLover

You distort, shit happens.

Romney lost the debate, shit happens.

Chill LL, maybe Mitt will win the next one.

One will be elected, shit will continue to happen, no matter who gets elected.

True but ask crybaby JD, two wrongs don't make it right !...or is that COG that says that shit all the time? LOL Originally Posted by WTF

No doubt Romney was tired of being robbed of time: he stood his ground. Odumbo interrupted Romney, and Romney had to stop his spiel and address Odumbo's challenge. No matter how you cut it, Odumbo was the transgressor who was at fault: and not vice versa.

He said the US would not tolerate "acts of terror" during his statement about what happened in Libya. Don't know how it could be more clear. You can parse it all you like, the words are there.

Crowley didn't say she was incorrect about what President Obama said, she said she shouldn't have interjected....and she's right about that. Stop blaming the "liberal media" for Mitt's loss last night and for every other thing that you idiots think is wrong with the world. We hate Fox News just as much as you hate the so-called "liberal media." With the difference being Fox News isn't journalism and doesn't really even pretend to be....it's blatantly partisan reporting and right-wing propaganda. With no complaints from you. So shut the fuck up and stop crying about it.

Deal with it. Originally Posted by timpage

I couldn't have said it better myself, TP! ALL of the wingnut crazies were out on this one trying to obscure and edit out the actual words he spoke in the Rose Garden that day - that "NO ACTS OF TERROR WILL EVER SHAKE THE RESOLVE OF THIS GREAT NATION".

The lying winguts on this board need to sit down and shut the fuck up and DEAL WITH THE FACT OBAMA CALLED THIS ATTACK AND ANY OTHERS LIKE IT

"ACTS OF TERROR"

AND WARNED THE TERRORISTS RESPONSIBLE THAT THE U.S. WOULD NOT TOLERATE THOSE ACTS AND THAT WE WOULD HUNT THEM DOWN!

Barleybrains, you are one STUPID SHIT if you have to resort to this sort of deception to defend your loser of a candidate.

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation!" President Barack Obama, September 12, 2012

Repeated three times for you slow learning righties. A quick look today reveals that righties all over the blogosphere are trying to re-write the definition of terrorism and acts of terror in a failed effort to keep their candidate from proving to everyone that he is the serial liar he's been proving he was all along!

Looks like WTF is doing a lot of whining today. Maybe if he repeats the phrase "Obama won" often enough, he will believe it. However, even though Obama was more forceful in this debate, his lies are still lies. You don't win a debate by lying all the way through it. Sorry, WTF. Your whining isn't convincing anyone.

And Stephanie. Seriously, too much caffeine already? It's still early. You've GOT to lay off that stuff! You sound stupider and stupider each time! Get a grip, my disturbed little friend!

Even Candy Crowley and Anderson Cooper have admitted she made a mistake and they also admitted Romney’s attack on Odumbo was correct in that he asserted Odumbo, et al, perpetuated the fraud that a video caused the attack on Benghazi. Yet you inebriated purveyors of MS-DNC, being the Kool Aid sucking saps you are, congregate here in this forum and show of your collective ignorance by denying she amended her initial claim and support for Odumbo. Odumbo's Rose Garden Address remarks regarding "acts of terror" was predicated by paragraphs pertaining to commemorating those who had perished on 9/11 2001. Subsequent to that address, Odumbo referred to the attack as "spontaneous riot" in reaction to a blasphemous video. Hence, the liberal assertion that Odumbo addressed the Benghazi attack as an act of terrorism is torpedoed by Odumbo's remarks on The View; on UNIVISION and at the UN. Exhibit A:

That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity. It is an insult not only to Muslims, but to America as well - for as the city outside these walls makes clear, we are a country that has welcomed people of every race and religion. We are home to Muslims who worship across our country. We not only respect the freedom of religion - we have laws that protect individuals from being harmed because of how they look or what they believe. We understand why people take offense to this video because millions of our citizens are among them.
I know there are some who ask why we don't just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech. Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. Moreover, as President of our country, and Commander-in-Chief of our military, . . . .There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents. There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy. There is no slander that provides an excuse for people to burn a restaurant in Lebanon, or destroy a school in Tunis, or cause death and destruction in Pakistan." Odumbo’s September 25 UN Speech.

Read more at http://www.mstarz.com/articles/5205/...dL4TuZeoXAR.99

There are a dozen or so similar remarks made by Rice and Carney.

if thsi is all you boys and girls have to bitch about guess what?

yer fucked

If this is all? The administration lying for weeks to cover their own ass after an ambassador was killed? If this is all? This is impeachable!

You will defend ANYTHING! Even the death of diplomats! You are an embarrassment, CBJ7.

You distort, shit happens.

Romney lost the debate, shit happens. Originally Posted by WTF

Please start practicing on ... "manure occurs" .... it is more polite and Harvard.

WTF the Expert Debate Judge ..

......... just another label to slap on the wall.

congrats COF ... yer fucked

congrats COF ... yer fucked Originally Posted by CJ7

We all are, if my prediction of an Obama re-election is accurate.

Well if you're not fucked now, Bitchita Whineman, GET FUCKED!

The "context" you are ignoring, Essence, is that Odumbo was talking about 9/11 2001 as an "Act of Terror".

. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

IBHalfwit, what is your evidence for this imaginative assertion?

We all are, if my prediction of an Obama re-election is accurate. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

keep sidestepping the real issues, the economy, jobs, healthcare etc and you can bet your ass and the farm on it ..

but then again, the embassy killings were a big break for willard, and keep him from having to dodge those issues with details ...

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation!" President Barack Obama, September 12, 2012 Originally Posted by Little Stevie

Do you think just because you write it on a Big Chief tablet that it makes it true?

This is the 4th year in a row that knuckleheads as yourself have had to interpet what the Harvard Law School - President of the Harvard Law Review - graduate - Constitutional Law Professor has said ..... one way you do that is to excise out of what he says select words and then fill in the GAPS to fit YOUR beliefs an desires ...

If he meant what you said in the Rose Garden on the 12th then ....

HE LIED TO THE WORLD AT THE U.N.
HIS AMBASSADOR TO THE U.N. LIED TO THE CITIZENS OF THE U.S.
VP BIDEN LIED DURING HIS DEBATE
SECRETARY CLINTON LIED TO THE WORLD AND THE U.S. CITIZENS.

So you pick!

The team leader either lied last night or
The team leader and the team have been lying ever since.

Unfortunately for you, and fortunately for the rest of the world, not everyone else out there besides youreself is a knit-wit, like you are.

Now please let the Harvard Law School - President of the Harvard Law Review - graduate - Constitutional Law Professor speak for himself .. Candy!