Are Dallas Guys a Bunch of Weak WKs?

Lily, I believe the vast majority of guys on here post reviews because they had a great time. And a few post when the sessions are not good. Do some, if not most, embellish to some degree? Or look back through rose colored glasses? Sure. And that's OK to a degree.

The OP asked about WKs. There is a small but very vocal group of guys who jump to the often unneeded defense of who ever their current infatuation is. They also aggressively attack guys who are expressing their opinions about a provider. Not due to malice but simply what they believe. There is also a small group of guys who pounce on every guy who states a view that supports a provider as a white knight It does not matter how well supported through facts the poster may be. Any support given to a provider that does not fall in line with the views of these few guys is a WK talking.

These activities have the effect of making some guys, and sometimes, providers less likely to post valuable information because they don't like being attacked for their views. This small group of guys try to use intimation to stifle opposing views. Kind of like Obama and democrats in congress.

.... He is a cyber stalking troll and has an agenda on me and has even admitted it. Originally Posted by davidfree986

WOW, Thanks Bigdog0311 for admitting you are DavidFree986. Its about time.

You see, the only person I have ever stated I have an agenda against is Bigdog0311. And Bigdog0311/Davidfree986 just identified himself as the guy I have said I have an agenda against.

Thanks again Bigdog0311 for coming clean at last. Now everyone knows for sure.

Now, based on his own words, can we get this douche bag banned again?

OldLRRP, most of the reviews I have problems with and the ones I have to ignore completely when making a decision are the Embellishment Writers who strive to be, actually have to be, the 'First' to write they have seen this new gal and just to name a couple it's You&Me and Shep3.0 but there are others...Again, they are driven to be the first, or earlier reviewer of a lady because that GAME impresses their Fan Club and has less risk in their review being called 'unlikely it went down like that'.
Originally Posted by ManSlut

Embellishment Writers.... makes you want to pull the women aside and get the real story.

Back in the ASPD days, there were a few well known guys that would write reviews in exchange for the session. I will get you all of this business because I'm so popular. It apparently works. Some of these reviews look more like advertisements than reviews. Some of the girls are very appealing. When I have followed their reviews outside of Dallas, they aren't as well received. They get all YES recommendations until they go out of town. The followers are the "Me Too" guys.

Think about it. Say, you are well known. You tell a new girl, "I'm going to make the phone ring". "You will have so many PMs and emails, you will have to get a secretary". "Get a room." "I will take a dozen pictures." "Then you give me head and I will fuck you in 10 positions not including the butt then CIM." That girl might be the worst lay of your life but what are you going to say? You are going to write a review where the sex was so good you levitated and it took a dozen lemons to get the smile off your face.

Wow all the drama over what I said and of course it was taken wrong. My point is that you should read a lot of reviews before deciding on how a provider might be. Why bc a lot of WK's exaggerate their reviews. Reviews should be truthful and to the point. Also I'm not saying give a yes for poor performance. I am saying if the provider performs her menu with some passion her in call is clean an she isn't bitchy she probably will get a yes. Now if she is a dead lay of course a no. A provider would have to be pretty bad to get a no. However a reviewer should state that in the review. I read a lot of reviews I know are BS. Also most times the providers looks are overstated. Model material is way overused. I know a lot of readers here no what I am talking about. So I use multiple reviews to reach my conclusions. Sorry I wasn't so clear before. Man you all are bitchy tonight. Why don you all get laid.

Wow all the drama over what I said and of course it was taken wrong. My point is that you should read a lot of reviews before deciding on how a provider might be. Why bc a lot of WK's exaggerate their reviews. Reviews should be truthful and to the point. Also I'm not saying give a yes for poor performance. I am saying if the provider performs her menu with some passion her in call is clean an she isn't bitchy she probably will get a yes. Now if she is a dead lay of course a no. A provider would have to be pretty bad to get a no. However a reviewer should state that in the review. I read a lot of reviews I know are BS. Also most times the providers looks are overstated. Model material is way overused. I know a lot of readers here no what I am talking about. So I use multiple reviews to reach my conclusions. Sorry I wasn't so clear before. Man you all are bitchy tonight. Why don you all get laid. Originally Posted by b2pop

Thanks for the clarification but that is not how it came out. Now, we are in agreement.

I am in New Orleans. Back home taking care of some business. ...with my best friends in life ....Great food ...good music ...la vie est belle

Between this site and aspd I have written over 180 reviews. I have only created one "NO" review and one that should have been a no but wasn't considered a review because nothing but a hug took place.
Yes I've had lots and lots of sessions that were just average and considering I'm not happy with an average session there is no way in hell I would repeat. But there is no way that I'm going to put a No in the recommendation for just an average session.
I'll put the details in the ROS for those with PA to read and decide for themselves. If they don't have PA then I really don't care that they don't see ROS. Get PA...it's not exactly difficult. I might edit the review and put something like "See ROS" if there is something noteworthy. I'm not going to put no for an average session, read the details for yourself and decide,
I'm not about to screw with somebody's livelihood because the session was just OK. It has to be really bad for me to put a "No" and that's only happened twice.
If you don't like it....well I don't really care.
Bottom line is it's my session, my time, my money and my review...I'll put what I think I should put.

Between this site and aspd I have written over 180 reviews. I have only created one "NO" review and one that should have been a no but wasn't considered a review because nothing but a hug took place.
Yes I've had lots and lots of sessions that were just average and considering I'm not happy with an average session there is no way in hell I would repeat. But there is no way that I'm going to put a No in the recommendation for just an average session.
I'll put the details in the ROS for those with PA to read and decide for themselves. If they don't have PA then I really don't care that they don't see ROS. Get PA...it's not exactly difficult. I might edit the review and put something like "See ROS" if there is something noteworthy. I'm not going to put no for an average session, read the details for yourself and decide,
I'm not about to screw with somebody's livelihood because the session was just OK. It has to be really bad for me to put a "No" and that's only happened twice.
If you don't like it....well I don't really care. Originally Posted by L.A.

I don't disagree with that at all. I bet you do enough recon, and have personal recommendations, that you aren't going in blind. I have been fortunate that I haven't been disappointed. If I see someone that is young, edgy with so so reviews, I'm going to opt to play it safe. There are enough sure bets in Dallas. I will easily run out of time before I get to them.

Going back to the original question ... yes DFW is full of wks.

+1 to LA comment. Also Pyramider is correct.

Going back to the original question ... yes DFW is full of wks. Originally Posted by pyramider

This thread tho.. Lolz

Has this thread answered it's own question yet? Have enough people taken themselves and the ho board seriously enough yet?

Never one to second guess intent, I would say though that OldLRRP has been trolling some patentable bait....good job!

Between this site and aspd I have written over 180 reviews. Originally Posted by L.A.

Good Golly Molly - Looks like someone has been fucking!

I don't even think I have that many OK's on P411.

Good Golly Molly - Looks like someone has been fucking!

I don't even think I have that many OK's on P411. Originally Posted by BrownSugarBaby

Yeah..it's pretty pathetic

Yeah..it's pretty pathetic Originally Posted by L.A.

I hope you're being sarcastic.

I hope you're being sarcastic. Originally Posted by BrownSugarBaby

Kinda sad I have 180 well...181 reviews now.

Nothing about you.....
.