I find it interesting that Trump himself has backed away from his statement by saying he was being sarcastic.
.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
he was using hyperbole and being sarcastic, why is that so interesting to you?
its not becoming and reflects poorly on you for you to continue to swallow whole the false and feigned umbrage of the dim news media.
the media who jump at any opportunity to denigrate trump.
they express shock and push the idiocy that he was being literal when he says Obama and Hellary founded isis over and over on their "news" programs
do you actually think trump thought Obama met with the killers of isis to form the group?
you have two choices , 1. that trump thought Obama and hellary were the incorporators and founders of isis and organized people into that group, or 2. that he meant their polices set the stage for its formation and growth
to actually believe 1. is idiotic, to not really believe it but further it is partisan politics and supposedly everything is allowed in politics. its just so depressing the news media is that corrupt and that they have such a low opinion of their audience
perhaps you just want to join in the attacks in support of hellary? that's possible, but then that shows no good will or coherent argument
was hellary being literal when she said trump was isis' number one recruiter?
why didn't the dim news media spend a week making fun of hellary for that statement?
because they knew it was hyperbole and they support her anyway
trumps statement has some validity in that Obama's polices were formative, hellary's has no validity
hellary's claim about trump was spin based on illogic but who cares the people are stupid, we just need to keep repeating it, likewise this claim