Obama’s policy strategy: Ignore laws

Oh and I forgot racist.

[SIZE=3][FONT=Arial]Doove, I admitted that if Obama went to Normandy that he did in fact honor D-Day. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Big frickin' deal. The point was your phony outrage over the whole thing. A phony outrage that you had to lie to defend. "Truthy" indeed. Only after having the facts knocked over your head with a sledgehammer did you drop it.

I have also clearly stated my reasons for not liking Obama, and I have no desire to keep responding to your ridiculous claims that I'd love Obama if there had never been a Hillary Clinton campaign.

Fine. Then don't.

I think Obama is a lazy, worthless, shifty, hen pecked lieing bitch who has never had a job that he didn't not show up for or work on the company's dime to write his books, and he is out for himself and himself alone. That is when Michelle takes his collar off and lets him climb out of his box. Clear enough?

Blah blah blah.

Joe, here's the link again. I had it cached. http://news.yahoo.com/shock-video-ob...033218997.html

Oh my God. What part of "the video is edited" don't you people get?

And what did you say about Andrea Mitchell?

Doofie, please post a link to the unedited video, and tell us what was cut out and how it effected what he said. Thank you.

Doofie, please post a link to the unedited video, and tell us what was cut out and how it effected what he said. Thank you.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Post #67, genius.

How does that change what he said? Asshole.

How does that change what he said? Asshole.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You're a lawyer, Genius, figure it out.

And it appears Jon Stewart found an even better clip edited by Fox News.

That's "EDITED BY FOX NEWS".

Oh, ok. if FOX edits it then it is ok. Fine. Asshole.

Oh, ok. if FOX edits it then it is ok. Fine. Asshole.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You're making even less sense than usual.

Frazzled, are ya?

You're a lawyer, Genius, figure it out.

And it appears Jon Stewart found an even better clip edited by Fox News.

That's "EDITED BY FOX NEWS". Originally Posted by Doove

OK. I will grant you that FOX is wrong in doing this just like what Andrea Mitchell did. However, in his policy he is not prioritizing prosecution he is refusing to prosecute. There is a big difference there.

I still think that his publicly announcing that this was his policy was the wrong thing to do. It encourages people to bring kids here in hopes that if they manage to stay long enough they will get to stay permanently. That is bad policy. The last thing we need is another motivating reason for people to come here illegally. He could have made the enforcement policy quietly by stating the enforcement priorities through the department heads where these cases are done only if all other priorities are dealt with first. That would have ensured they were never done without changing the law or publicly encouraging illegal immigration.

OK. I will grant you that FOX is wrong in doing this just like what Andrea Mitchell did.

I still think that his publicly announcing that this was his policy was the wrong thing to do. It encourages people to bring kids here in hopes that if they manage to stay long enough they will get to stay permanently. That is bad policy. The last thing we need is another motivating reason for people to come here illegally. He could have made the enforcement policy quietly by stating the enforcement priorities through the department heads where these cases are done only if all other priorities are dealt with first. That would have ensured they were never done without changing the law or publicly encouraging illegal immigration. Originally Posted by Laz

If Obama had changed the enforcement policy quietly as you suggest, he would have lost the political advantage of pandering to Mexican-Americans. Obama realizes that this type of high profile change in policy encourages additional illegal immigration; that's what he wants. Illegal immigrants usually become new Democrat voters.

I notice you keep referencing the edited version of the video.

What's that you were saying about Andrea Mitchell? Originally Posted by Doove

Notice your dumb ass completely ignored the other citation, Doofus.


“This notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is not true,” Obama told Hispanic journalists at an “Open for Questions” White House roundtable. “The fact of the matter is there are laws on the books I have to enforce.”


http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1yK5L3MQF

I notice you keep referencing the edited version of the video.

What's that you were saying about Andrea Mitchell? Originally Posted by Doove

Oh, and BTW, you also ignored Articles I and II in the Constitution where it states that the legislative branch has the sole power to legislate laws and the executive branch is constitutionally required to enforce those laws.

Big frickin' deal. The point was your phony outrage over the whole thing. A phony outrage that you had to lie to defend. "Truthy" indeed. Only after having the facts knocked over your head with a sledgehammer did you drop it. Originally Posted by Doove

LOL, thanks! Along with forgetting racist, I forgot truthy and a "let them cling to their guns and religion" intellectual snob. Question, what was he doing in hate whitie church every week if he wasn't down with religion or the Man Upstairs? Personally I think it demonstrates that he's a hen pecked racist. But that's just me.

Blah blah blah. Originally Posted by Doove

Funny, that's what I think when I read your Obama's great / Olivia's got a lezzie crush on Hillary bullshit.

Oh my God. What part of "the video is edited" don't you people get? Originally Posted by Doove

It was you on the Grassy Knoll wasn't it!

And what did you say about Andrea Mitchell? Originally Posted by Doove

I had to look up your reference. I didn't know who Andrea Mitchell was. I'm not an oligarch, and I have no idea what the the "average American convenience store experience" is; I never go into the nasty places myself if I can help it. I don't smoke; I don't buy beer singles; I rarely eat junk food; and I don't gamble so I'm not buying lottery tickets. I pay for my gas outside and drive on.

OK. I will grant you that FOX is wrong in doing this just like what Andrea Mitchell did. However, in his policy he is not prioritizing prosecution he is refusing to prosecute. There is a big difference there. Originally Posted by Laz

The only difference is in semantics. So if that qualifies as "a big difference", then oh well.

Notice your dumb ass completely ignored the other citation, Doofus.


“This notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is not true,” Obama told Hispanic journalists at an “Open for Questions” White House roundtable. “The fact of the matter is there are laws on the books I have to enforce.”


http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1yK5L3MQF Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Notice my dumb ass did no such thing. Your quote came from the video i linked to in post #81.

So suck it.

If Obama had changed the enforcement policy quietly as you suggest, he would have lost the political advantage of pandering to Mexican-Americans. Obama realizes that this type of high profile change in policy encourages additional illegal immigration; that's what he wants. Illegal immigrants usually become new Democrat voters. Originally Posted by joe bloe

Shorter joe bloe: Obama shouldn't tell people when he makes decisions they might support because that might make them want to vote for him.