"Honest Opinion Fellas" by Thickems

rduke4923's Avatar
Originally Posted by Valerie
Their "handlers" aren't, the royals choose who they want, their handlers make the calls. Being that you're a numpty and I'm the whore who has experience in this particular instance, I'd say your opinion is irrelevant...

Not funny at all, it proved a point.

No luvyou have not. Royals worth a trillion dollars do not buy of the rack,
nor do they use the private tailers the rich use. They sure as hell do not use a service when it comes to women. When you are at that level there is only one goal and that
is to have and enjoy what no one else does.
They have stables of horses, cars and yes women.

A service? who are you trying to kid?

Oh and along with Numpty maybe throw in the word Muggle. It will really show
you are authentic.
Trey's Avatar
  • Trey
  • 04-07-2016, 06:56 AM
Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter
Nice

What am I looking at? Originally Posted by LuckOfTheOrient
Where I plan on my dick going today.
ICU 812's Avatar
Either type of picture can be good or bad.

Professionally done pictures should be clear and sharp with good lighting. Yet the Glam-and Bling should not obscure who the provider is with excessive make-up and elaborate outfits.

Armature photos down to and including smart phone selfies have a real-world authenticity, but still must be clear, in focus and well lighted.

What a hobbyist wants to know is what the provider looks like. The images should tell us what her overall body type is ("athletic, curvy, spinner, MILF etc) and should showcase her bust, butt, abdomen, grooming and hair color/style.

These images do not need to be nude or pornographic.
Sushi on a naked body......maybe a strawberry between the breast...


Ahehehe.....







QUOTE=Trey;1057914021]I still jack off to your pics. Jk

Pics I hate to see are, the ones with food covering the chick, I really hate when girls ad filters like old time camera effects or black and white like this is fucking art class or something, I'm also not a fan of the poon shot. I love the poon but truly it ain't something that gets me going just looking at it.

Base requirements for useful pics would be a headshot, full body shots, side view of the booty, some shots that show how fun the boobies can be (I lov boobies). I prefer a lady where different outfits than just pose naked, but a boobie out is still pretty sexy. CB I think you have a pretty good set of pics shows you what you're getting and that's the info we need. I like a mix of pro shots and non pro. The pro can be misleading at times an nonpro shot can verify the accuracy of the pro shot.[/QUOTE]
I am not a fan of photoshop. I hate when you see a picture of a woman with perfect skin nad you get there and she has bad skin and is covered with tats, not professional tats, but what loos like prison tats of every guy she has dated.
You, on the other hand, have nothing to worry about, you are very attractive.
There is nothing wrong with recent, well done selfies. However, there is also a factor of what type of clientele you are after. If you want to elevate beyond a certain price point, you are expected to look like a professional that has invested in her business.

For a board like this, unless you are trying to charge higher than the average rate, selfies are fine. But I would have never used selfies on my website back in my day. You don't attract money by looking cheap. (not saying you look cheap, but having nothing but selfies implies a lack of investment)