Hey Dickmuncher - Same question for you as I posed to your ignorant, math-challenged pal CBJellyfish:
How can the cost of anything (whether it is an original cost or an adjusted cost) drop by more than 100%?
Word of advice - You don't need to pump up the font size and put all of your comments in boldface. It doesn't make your arguments any more persuasive. It merely makes you look too insecure to post normally. Originally Posted by lustylad
That was more than a word, douche-bag.
And you're right. I don't need to.
I like to.
Rather than point out anything incorrect about my argument or offering up any type of factual rebuttal, you bitch about my font size.
You truly believe a verbal slip means the President doesn't know how many states there are.
Talk about insecure.
To answer your stupid question that addresses nothing I said or implied, the stupid question you threw out in a desperate attempt at salvaging anything I will ask you a question.
Using your words, How can the cost of anything (whether it is an original cost or an adjusted cost) drop by more than 100%?
Say the cost of item A is $100. In 2013, everyone seemed to want one.
It is now 2014 and item B is the cat's ass. You dropped the price of item A to $0. You can't give them away and you need the space. They cost $10 per item to be hauled away.
Now the question.
Have you ever sucked a bigger dick than mine? Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
How far can an "estimate" be off before it is considered a lie? How does one reduce any amount by 3000% and arrive at anything but a negative number?This will be fun. I'll answer questions and you will amaze me by how far you will go to avoid mine.
How is it you can't figure this out for yourself? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
This will be fun. I'll answer questions and you will amaze me by how far you will go to avoid mine.But you're the expert on engorging dicks to 3000% and reducing them to zero, MasterDickMuncher! Don't be so humble, MasterDickMuncher!
How far off to be a lie? I don't know. Any answer I gave would be an estimate.
How to reduce an amount by 3000% and get other than a negative number? Not sure about that either.
Maybe increase it by 3001% first?
The main thing I can't figure out is how either of those questions applies to my response to your post;
Originally Posted by CJ7
“your employer, it’s estimated, would see premiums fall by as much as 3,000%”
estimated / guarantee ... same thing ... right girls ?
It amazes me how far you will go to defend Obama, CBJ7! Especially for an "independent".
I pointed out an attorney should know the wiggle room between an estimate and a promise. It seems to me it would be in the neighborhood of the room between"and" and "or".
I pointed out pointing that out is hardly a stretch to defend a person.
My question is why do you ignore the fact that my response addressed one post? Defend your previous statements in the post I addressed. Stop trying to pass opinions (you know, estimates) as fact. Stop using my ability or inability to answer a question as proof your opinions are facts. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
But you're the expert on engorging dicks to 3000% and reducing them to zero, MasterDickMuncher! Don't be so humble, MasterDickMuncher! Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Oh my God. I'm slain by the culler! Actually I should save this post. You didn't directly mention cum. I know you would argue to your dying day that by mentioning engorging and reducing dicks that you were referring to cum but it looks to me you meant it as a verb.It's very befitting that you are endorsed as a "nothing", MasterDickMuncher.
An endorsement from you as to my abilities means the same as your endorsement of anybody or anything else.
Nothing. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
post # 12
Why is it that you ignorant lib-retarded morons cannot see that taxes paid for subsidies IS an INCREASE in health insurance costs for every tax paying citizen, CBJ7?what part of increase don't you understand asshat ?
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
http://nation.foxnews.com/obamacare/...ms-200-percent
An exhaustive study by three congressional committees delivers startling news about the dire effects of Obamacare: President Barack Obama’s signature legislation could increase health insurance premiums by over 200 percent and render insurance coverage unaffordable for millions of Americans.
Broadly, the new report declares that Obamacare “breaks its core promise” to make healthcare coverage affordable
a premium increases by 200 % and loses 100% of the increase the premium isn't FREE
youre a dumbass
The End
Originally Posted by CJ7
This will be fun. I'll answer questions and you will amaze me by how far you will go to avoid mine. You have not asked me a question.Hey! You're right, MunchiOnMen! This IS fun!
How far off to be a lie? I don't know. Any answer I gave would be an estimate. So you agree. At some point an estimate becomes a lie. Thank you.
How to reduce an amount by 3000% and get other than a negative number? Not sure about that either. Hmmm . . .Not sure? Seriously? Try "It's impossible".
Maybe increase it by 3001% first? That was not part of the equation. Typical. Make stuff up to fit your own scenario rather than address the issue.
The main thing I can't figure out is how either of those questions applies to my response to your post; Not surprising. You have the intellectual capacity of a tree toad.
Originally Posted by CJ7
“your employer, it’s estimated, would see premiums fall by as much as 3,000%”
estimated / guarantee ... same thing ... right girls ?
It amazes me how far you will go to defend Obama, CBJ7! Especially for an "independent".
I pointed out an attorney should know the wiggle room between an estimate and a promise. I do. That's how I know Obama is lying. It seems to me it would be in the neighborhood of the room between"and" and "or".
I pointed out pointing that out is hardly a stretch to defend a person.
My question is why do you ignore the fact that my response addressed one post? Defend your previous statements in the post I addressed. Stop trying to pass opinions (you know, estimates) as fact. Stop using my ability or inability to answer a question as proof your opinions are facts. I don't use your inability in that manner. I use it to prove you are stupid. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
<<< MunchOnMen
