Do We Really Need to Keep the Poor?

I want no compromise freedom. There is no compromise in defending Liberty. Once you start compromising, by trading a little liberty for a little security, you will soon have neither.

I want no compromise freedom. There is no compromise in defending Liberty. Once you start compromising, by trading a little liberty for a little security, you will soon have neither. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I'm all for Anarchy.

But civil society will not go for that, therefore one needs to compromise or move to a island.

You live in a bubble COG.

How did "compromise" become a virtue? Compromise means both sides lose. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Of course you think this.

Compromise is the art of getting what you need while allowing the other side to feel they have accomplished something for themselves.

Very few things are necessary to have at 100%. Many compromises do not affect the most important aspects of the goal.

WWII ended as soon as the Allies agreed to the "compromise" of not taking down the Japanese emperor. That "compromise" saved countless lives, ended much of the suffering, and did not harm any of the Allies' goals. In fact it probably helped overall.

Old Dingus