Which I acknowledged when I said "if" the whole taser incident wasn't the case but it was.Unbunch your panties HF. Seems you’ve got them in a serious twist. Must be cutting off blood flow and all. You were wrong and no matter how many paragraphs of accusations you make it won’t make you right.
You said "nobody" but HF was interested in the "defense of others" defense and yet the prosecutor felt the need to bring it up and every lawyer in the country brought it up if only to say that it would not "over-ride" the taser incident which I agreed with from the beginning.
All I ever said, was that any defense attorney worth their salt ( we can scratch you from the list apparently ) would put this in the minds of the jury. At no time did I ever say or think, that "this defense" would over ride the fact that the officer made an egregious mistake that simply could not be over looked.
Oh! and yeah, I said from the very first post and in each continuing post, that she should get some time but that being "inconvenient" for your argument, you simply ignored the facts.
You made an argument using words I never said and failed to acknowledge what I did say which makes you a coward in my book. You are very much like 1BM1 and every day you post on this board, you lie to us about who you are. Every time you post, you lie.
Deny that! Originally Posted by HedonistForever
Like I said. I expect this of you, and nothing more.
