George Soros Buys Local DAs

And why should PAC's and advocacy groups be special in being allowed to remain hidden, WHEN THEIR donations often are the MOST those politicians get? Originally Posted by garhkal

If I give money to the RNC or DNC, I'm not donating to a specific candidate. Likewise if I give money to a 501(c)4 that lobbies and runs ads in favor of, say, lower taxes or more border security, it's also not funneled to a specific person.

I already explained why certain contributions should remain confidential from snitchfuck and his ilk. Look up Brendan Eich/Mozilla.

The Koch Bros. are to the Republican party as what Soros is to the Democratic party. That's really all it boils down too.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Very true. Another example of one side rejoicing that they got their way (Citizen United), then screaming when it is used against them. Soros, Koch, neither wants a truly informed democracy--they want a slate of candidates that allow them to be the power behind the thrown. I find it amazing and disgusting that some on here cannot see that both are examples of the laws stacking the deck in favor of the 0.01%, and the Wacko followers of both extremes being graduates of the Rev Jones Kool-aid Drinking School.

I don't think it gave anyone an unfair funding advantage. It put the public at a disadvantage. It put all the power into the hands of a small group of gazillionaires who don't give a flying fuck about any of us. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Hahahaha you simple-minded fuck, what makes you think all gazillionaires think the same? Soros and Koch are at opposite extremes in terms of their politics. So are Warren Buffett and your pal Sheldon Adelson.

Do citizens automatically give up their First Amendment rights to express their views on the issues of the day when they surpass a certain income level? Why no, they don't!

Besides, money is overrated in the age of social media. Find something else to get hysterical about, oinkboy.

If I give money to the RNC or DNC, I'm not donating to a specific candidate. Likewise if I give money to a 501(c)4 that lobbies and runs ads in favor of, say, lower taxes or more border security, it's also not funneled to a specific person.

I already explained why certain contributions should remain confidential from snitchfuck and his ilk. Look up Brendan Eich/Mozilla. Originally Posted by lustylad

Not one single dime should ever campaign contribution should ever be allowed to remain hidden, from either side.

If you do not have the balls to say who you donated to, then do not donate.

The public deserves to know where all money spent duringan election comes from. This chickenshit way they try and hide campaign contributions is nullshit and dumbasses like you endorse it. Shameful really.

Now go snitch on T H O R a if that makes you feel useful.

Hahahaha you simple-minded fuck, what makes you think all gazillionaires think the same? Soros and Koch are at opposite extremes in terms of their politics. So are Warren Buffett and your pal Sheldon Adelson.

Do citizens automatically give up their First Amendment rights to express their views on the issues of the day when they surpass a certain income level? Why no, they don't!

Besides, money is overrated in the age of social media. Find something else to get hysterical about, oinkboy. Originally Posted by lustylad

We are talking about transparency you hypocritical snitch.

Go fist bambino if you wanna talk shit he is always looking for a gentle prostrate massage!

Hahahaha you simple-minded fuck, what makes you think all gazillionaires think the same? Soros and Koch are at opposite extremes in terms of their politics. So are Warren Buffett and your pal Sheldon Adelson.

Do citizens automatically give up their First Amendment rights to express their views on the issues of the day when they surpass a certain income level? Why no, they don't!

Besides, money is overrated in the age of social media. Find something else to get hysterical about, oinkboy. Originally Posted by lustylad

Corporate money is NOT "citizens," asshole.

And I assume the "your pal Sheldon Adelson" comment was yet another anti-Semitic jab, you ignorant alt-Nazi mouth breather. I haven't stepped foot in Adelson's casinos since he dropped $100 MM on the last cycle on the RWWipers.

The super PAC scam is absolutely that ... a fucking scam that allows evil shit be done without connection to the candidate. It's horseshit and a dodge.

How fucking stupid are you?

Go suck off your mentor, IBIdiot, Junior!

Corporate money is NOT "citizens," asshole.

And I assume the "your pal Sheldon Adelson" comment was yet another anti-Semitic jab, you ignorant alt-Nazi mouth breather. I haven't stepped foot in Adelson's casinos since he dropped $100 MM on the last cycle on the RWWipers.

The super PAC scam is absolutely that ... a fucking scam that allows evil shit be done without connection to the candidate. It's horseshit and a dodge.

How fucking stupid are you?

Go suck off your mentor, IBIdiot, Junior! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You'd be the cock-sucking, swinish liar, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. Alt-Right Nazis don't have Jewish daughters and sons-in-law ... or visit the Western Wall, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM; hence, your disingenuous attempt to apply such labels to Trump are fantastic lies.

If I give money to the RNC or DNC, I'm not donating to a specific candidate. Likewise if I give money to a 501(c)4 that lobbies and runs ads in favor of, say, lower taxes or more border security, it's also not funneled to a specific person.

I already explained why certain contributions should remain confidential from snitchfuck and his ilk. Look up Brendan Eich/Mozilla. Originally Posted by lustylad

and to a lesser extent, the california anti-gay marriage proposition, several people were revealed and were harassed & threatened with death threats over their donations.

You'd be the cock-sucking, swinish liar, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. Alt-Right Nazis don't have Jewish daughters and sons-in-law ... or visit the Western Wall, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM; hence, your disingenuous attempt to apply such labels to Trump are fantastic lies. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

She converted for the money.


You're so easy to make fun of. Show me another pajama boy Rachel Maddow meme. I need a laugh. It makes sense now. I'm unable to get to work because of the floods.

She converted for the money.

You're so easy to make fun of. Show me another pajama boy Rachel Maddow meme. I need a laugh. It makes sense now. I'm unable to get to work because of the floods. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Go play in the street, Pajama Boy. There are rich Gentiles too, Pajama Boy, e.g., her daddy is one.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

IBMassa really has a soft spot for Alex Jones.

Or is it a hard spot?

I already explained why certain contributions should remain confidential from snitchfuck and his ilk. Look up Brendan Eich/Mozilla. Originally Posted by lustylad

Which makes NO sense to me.. IF me giving to say Mcconnel is open info, WHY is it not open info, if instead i give to a PAC and that pac then gives...

Not one single dime should ever campaign contribution should ever be allowed to remain hidden, from either side.

If you do not have the balls to say who you donated to, then do not donate.

The public deserves to know where all money spent duringan election comes from. This chickenshit way they try and hide campaign contributions is nullshit and dumbasses like you endorse it. Shameful really. Originally Posted by WTF

Egads, me and WTF agree yet again..

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

IBMassa really has a soft spot for Alex Jones.

Or is it a hard spot? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider