Border at breaking point

That shows a real lack of conviction in your own beliefs when you censor other peoples (sic) posts. Just like the MAGA hat Cowards who are scardy (sic) cats and wouldn't dare wear them in public, you are part of that ilk. Im (sic) officially turning in my Lusty fan club membership. I don't affiliate myself with cowards. Stick with teaching grammar Lusty, you are to (sic) weak for anything else Originally Posted by themystic

Aww... don't be a sensitive little bitch, mystic. You just joined my fan club yesterday.

Far be it from me to "censor" anything you post. I'm just trying to sharpen your debate skills. If someone tells you that x and y are logically inconsistent, your response should be:

a) explain why x and y are NOT inconsistent,

b) admit that x is wrong, while y is correct.

c) concede that y is wrong but x is correct.

So pick one. Otherwise, you show a dismaying lack of conviction in your own beliefs.

Aww... don't be a sensitive little bitch, mystic. You just joined my fan club yesterday.

Far be it from me to "censor" anything you post. I'm just trying to sharpen your debate skills. If someone tells you that x and y are logically inconsistent, your response should be:

a) explain why x and y are NOT inconsistent,

b) admit that x is wrong, while y is correct.

c) concede that y is wrong but x is correct.

So pick one. Otherwise, you show a dismaying lack of conviction in your own beliefs. Originally Posted by lustylad

a. Youre at Trump panty boy
b. Your un American
c. you don't know your stuff
d. you are just a soft school teacher
e. you are a weak beta boy

Oh damn ,,, ^^^ really the best you can come up with,,,,,,,

It was your fucking article Lusty quoted; hence, not "off topic". YOUR fucking article cited points out that there is indeed a crisis on the border. Chucky, Nancy, hildebeest, Slick Willie and Odumbo were saying the same damn thing until November 2016. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Now that is really something for you yap dogs to get your panties in a bunch. Your +1 is off topic.

I read the entire article. Are you still claiming this article argues that the situation on the border is a manufactured crisis when in fact it is arguing just the opposite? Talk about doubling down on stupid. Sad, very sad, Ekim.


Did you ever find Nathan Phillips's service record proving that he was a Vietnam War veteran? Inquiring minds would like to know. Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

Another yap dog with her panties in a bunch.

Ignorance is bliss, Ekim. Enjoy!

you are going to hurt Ekim's feeling's I always thought he was Retarded Lenny


Originally Posted by Hotrod511

Now that is really something for you yap dogs to get your panties in a bunch. Your +1 is off topic. Originally Posted by bamscram

You're delusional. "+1" meant I 100% concurred with Lusty's on-topic rebuttal of your nonsense.

Ignorance is bliss, Ekim. Enjoy! Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

You're delusional. "+1" meant I 100% concurred with Lusty's on-topic rebuttal of your nonsense. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Speaking of ignorance, here are three examples.

Speaking of ignorance, here are three examples. Originally Posted by bamscram

I only see one

Speaking of ignorance, here are three examples. Originally Posted by bamscram

Three examples of ignorance: Ekim008, I'va biggen & bamscram all rolled into one.

So what’s your point IBH? You have a death wish?

You do know you’re violating the rules of this forum by trying to list another poster, right?

You also must know that images of animals are not allowed.

Direct personal attacks and insults?

Posting unlicensed stock footage and putting ECCIE at risk of copyright violations?

That late-model HUFF is pulling up to the front door, IBH.

So what’s your point IBH? You have a death wish?

You do know you’re violating the rules of this forum by trying to list another poster, right?

You also must know that images of animals are not allowed.

Direct personal attacks and insults?

Posting unlicensed stock footage and putting ECCIE at risk of copyright violations?

That late-model HUFF is pulling up to the front door, IBH. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Would you care to explicitly explain what the fuck you think is/was wrong and in violation of any forum rules? Until you do so, the only HUFF is definitively all yours.

So what’s your point IBH? You have a death wish?

You do know you’re violating the rules of this forum by trying to list another poster, right?

You also must know that images of animals are not allowed.

Direct personal attacks and insults?

Posting unlicensed stock footage and putting ECCIE at risk of copyright violations?

That late-model HUFF is pulling up to the front door, IBH. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

cite the rule book


stock footage is all over the place --- fair use doctrine is the by word.

Oh damn ,,, ^^^ really the best you can come up with,,,,,,, Originally Posted by rexdutchman

Rex Im so proud of you. Lusty was wrong. Your not ignorant. You completed another whole sentence. Good job little fella. We will make sure you get your participation trophy!