So now that it seems like the usual Mitches are done for tonight, back to my original post before it got so rudely hijacked:
I think that I pretty much made what my opinion is on this in this alert thread: ALL LADIES PLEASE READ. Cop posing as client to set ladies up... by Taylor Maide.
It seems that whenever a provider posts this kind of alert on a client or potential client, LexusLover takes it upon himself to stifle the thread with attacks, numerous posts trying to discredit the provider and their experience, turns the alert around on the lady where she feels like she has to defend themselves, and otherwise clog up the funnel that is supposed to provide a free flow of information in a section that is designed to keep this community safe.
I do not subscribe to the notion that most alerts, especially when it is about someone who has not been proven to be a member, should be only posted in the Infoshare or provider only areas. There are many ladies who only post on BP or may have just happened upon our community, and who does not yet have access to these areas whose safety and freedom could depend on alerts like this. Yet, when men post unsubstantiated alerts that could be a harm to a provider's safety, nothing is said about it AT ALL by him.
This is one of the responses that was given when I asked him why he feels the need to attack these kinds of posts all the time:
In today's environment it can get someone executed was they approach an incall location to meet a provider whose white knight buddies don't like cops and want a notch on their belt.....or up their "respect" from the provider. I realize it's "fashionable" to bash cops ... and particularly on this board ..
Originally Posted by LexusLover
And I call bullshit. Everyone on this board spends a reasonable (and sometimes unreasonable in some's eyes) amount of time trying to avoid LE. No one in their right mind trying to hobby here, male or female, is going to try and lure a cop to an incall to 'pop out' or try to engage with LE in a combative manner in any way. When cops come to an incall to bust you, they are not alone.. there is a whole squad line of cops waiting right outside your door. The same thing as if they call you for an outcall. They are NEVER there alone. Even LexusLover knows that, and so does any other hooker who has ever been caught in a sting, seen one on TV, or heard about one from a friend of theirs. So this could not possibly be the reason why.
He has also insisted and said that the provider was doing it for "advertising" or attention. Most of the ladies who have written these threads are not regular posters on the open board, and who gains from a member posting an embarrassing situation that happened to them to warn the community about a potential threat? The members in the community that are the most at risk to these kinds of situations, that's who.
When these types of threads are so convoluted with hostile posts and remarks hell bent on discrediting the OP, it makes chicks who was doing a service to the community by sharing feel like it's not worth the grief to go out of their way and warn others when things like this happen.
The alert section is unlike any other section on this board, and in my opinion the most important. It's not a place for jokes and games, it is the section that is available to every member regardless of status that highlights potential dangers to everyone's livelihood.
True, some alerts are just paranoid and egregious in reality, but even those have their place. Not only do they remind us to stay on our P's and Q's and be well aware, but some people have also self alerted on themselves! The community knows who these people are and how to discern when a story doesn't add up or makes no logical sense.
Why is it that provider alerts are allowed to be extinguished and hostilely scrutinized to the point where it doesn't pay to warn by this one member?
I submit the following evidence to the scrutiny of my peers to further illustrate my point. I only went back as far as the beginning of 2014 but since there are 51 (
) pages of this very type of behavior by this one person I will only pull them out as I need to.
What I would really like to know is what is the rationale behind this, and why is it allowed to continue?
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1406889
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...889&highlight=
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...post1056753279
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1205807
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=597163&highlight=
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1347122
Robbery post by female (attacked):
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...587&highlight=
Robbery post by male (it's all good):
But this is ok? How did you know these guys weren't lying to be vindictive and "for attention"?
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1176203
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1403400
...."name it I'll do it" ...
............. nothing like fair and accurate advertising.
Originally Posted by LexusLover
No problem with defending a guy accusing a BP girl of robbing him though
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...post1056166419
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...47&postcount=6
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=597163&highlight=
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1347122
John Muir thread
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1256809
LL says this here:
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...0&postcount=21
Perhaps I have missed something in the past, but there have been whole phone numbers deleted, dancer's names (stage names even) deleted, license plate numbers deleted, and they were not folks with "handles" being connected with the "real world" information .... then we have the LMT's with no handles either.
That list is not a list of "convictions" ... it's a list of "accusations" ...
.. and why is it necessary to post the list of names anyway ..?
It's a "violation" of human decency and common courtesy.
Originally Posted by LexusLover
But here, he don't mind outting girls who's full names and pictures are posted in an ad for a misdemeanor sting operation for all to see?
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...post1056194540
http://www.yourhoustonnews.com/atasc...77afa7028.html
Thanks for the link. Here's a link within the link with more "details."
The STINGS apparently occurred on 17 December, and the ladies were lured to the "outcall" location.
Can anyone say: "screening"!
Originally Posted by LexusLover
And then we have this gem:
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...3&postcount=16
Why?
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...31&postcount=9
How ironic:
In the first link of my post, this quote by LexusLover there:
And the OPs alert "protects" others from what? Or perhaps from whom?
An unknown male in a truck talking on the phone in an incall parking lot .... or.... the officers in the marked units that arrived while the unknown male in a truck was talking on the phone in an incall parking lot?
Any thing else is pure speculation.
Originally Posted by LexusLover
But it was this one not long ago in a guy's alert thread:
It is "discomforting" to have LE arrive at the precise time one is "supposed" to be in the parking lot to call for the room ....
,,,,, or some "spotter" in a vehicle across the street from the gate with a pile of cigarette butts on the black top next to the driver's side door .... watching the gate when one is asked .... "Are you at the gate yet?"
Ladies ... this isn't just about your security.
Originally Posted by LexusLover
At the end of the day, it's not just anyone's safety. One domino can bring down the whole deck. I've seen girls get pinched, and to save their own ass are allowed to continue working as long as they throw others under the bus to get pinched also. This includes the guys that they see, to providers who give false references for LE.
Why oh why is the alert section allowed to be used this way by one member, and one member only? And my question to you directly LexusLover, is why do you do this?
There has been rumors speculating as to why, and I thinck that's another thing he takes issue with, is that some veteran and newbie providers assume from some of his posts that he is LE because he posts LE like things, often to the contrary of possible LE alerts. This problem is no one's but his; no one controls what he posts. I know for certain quite a few new girls have been spooked out by some of the things that he posts that point in that direction, but instead of modifying the behaviour so they don't thinck that, he goes into attack mode.
And as always there's this golden nugget. Since you opened the door on this for scrutiny, as did Kam (no offense darling) I have yet another question to ask.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kammye
Although i dont like to engage in the shenanigans on here. I have to say that Lexus Lover is NOT LE....I know this for sure.
"Information" = knowledge, facts.
Originally Posted by LexusLover
Since you don't write reviews (which means nothing here in my eyes practically) how does she "know for sure" that you are not? Have you guys seen each other BCD to know, or did you meet over tea and crumpets one day and have the most delightful of conversations? I'm curious as hell. A simple answer 1.yes we have seen each other BCD, or 2. No we have not. will be sufficient enough for me.
I'll let everyone else make their decision on their own (which is how it is meant to be, not having one member shove it their opinion down your throat).