one wonders why WTF likes soaking in the bullshit filled bathtub. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm... Why?? ... 'cause what else does he have here?
at THIS bit o' news--
Joe is in the clear this time.
... Why?? ... 'cause what else does he have here?Who do I blame if my stock price doubles?
WTF is surely pissin' in his-own stew everyday.
He's defending the dotty bludger who had DOUBLED
the price of petrol-gas, raised energy prices,
and has inflation at high levels.
... All he can do is blame Trump.
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
... "BUMP!"
... Crikey! ... Wouldja look
The US Dept. of Defence and private individuals WERE PUSHING the
Trump/Alfa Bank hoax. .... Durham has the e-mails.
And those "private individuals" from Georgia Tech ALSO assisted
in the Mueller investigation of Donald Trump.
So the Spygate people ALSO did work for Robert Mueller's team.
The very-same people trying to set up Trump with false ties
to Russia - also worked FOR Mueller.
Blimey! ... Trump's gonna have So MANY people and avenues
to SUE here - from the FBI/DOJ people who tryed to frame him,
to Georgia Tech university - for their researchers' conduct,
and all the way to Fusion GPS, Perkins-Coie and Hillary Clinton.
Wouldn't it be something IF Durham can even trace the Spygate
all the way to former President OBama.
... Reckon I'm rather sure Sleepy
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
John Durham Springs His Trap After 'Hillary for America' Walks Right Into It
Last Tuesday, RedState reported on two desperate filings put forth by Hillary for America and Fusion GPS. They attempted to assert attorney-client privilege over materials that John Durham’s prosecution of Michael Sussmann is seeking to get its hands on.
That left the obvious question open, though. How could Sussmann both simultaneously assert that he was acting on his own accord and not being paid by the Hillary campaign while at the same time having Hillary for America and Fusion GPS assert attorney-client privilege over their communications?
Here’s what I wrote at the time.Besides, isn’t this an admission that Sussmann was being paid by the Clinton campaign (via proxies)? If the information between Fusion GPS, Hillary for America, and Perkins Coie (Sussmann’s employer) is supposedly covered under attorney-client privilege, that would logically mean Sussmann was lying when he said he wasn’t working for any client at the time. Obviously, making that case in court is a fair bit more difficult than typing it out here, but still, it’s illuminating.To further complicate matters, Hillary for America entered into an agreement with the FEC to settle violations that expresses the opposite viewpoint they are now trying to argue before the judge in the Sussmann case. The Federalist’s Margot Cleveland explains in her write-up about a letter sent to Durham that pointed out that conflict.
In Friday’s letter, Backer also highlighted Hillary for America and the DNC’s commitment in their settlement agreement with the FEC to “not further contest the Commission’s finding of probable cause to believe” that the political organizations had “falsely reported their payments through Perkins Coie to Fusion GPS as being for legal services.” In contrast, in the Sussmann case, Hillary for America and the DNC “are nevertheless asserting materials generated by Fusion GPS and provided to Perkins Coie are protected by attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine,” the letter stressed.Do you see the issue? In one case, Hillary for America is saying: “Oh, Sussmann was just giving us legal services.” In another case, on the exact same payments, they are admitting: “Oh, Sussmann was not actually being paid for legal services.” You would think the judge overseeing Durham’s prosecution wouldn’t find that tactic very cute.
“The Government should not permit HFA and the DNC to adopt conflicting positions in different proceedings, depending on the federal agency against which they are litigating,” the foundation’s letter concluded, suggesting the trial court may find those breaches of the settlement agreement “material in ruling on any privilege claims.”
Sure enough, Durham is now springing his trap. On Saturday, he issued subpoenas before the jury to elicit open testimony on the issue of claiming attorney-client privilege.Sussmann’s attorneys said they learned Durham had issued the trial subpoenas Tuesday and that the special counsel is “requesting the testimony of witnesses regarding the assertion of attorney-client privilege in front of the jury.” The Clinton campaign and the DNC advised Sussmann they wanted to fight ”this plainly impermissible testimony,” Sussmann’s lawyers said.In other words, he’s about to get the relevant parties under oath and expose the contradiction. Either they are lying to the FEC in their prior agreement or they are lying in the Sussmann case...
“The Special Counsel this week took the astonishing and legally inappropriate step of subpoenaing witnesses for the express purpose of having them testify to the invocation of the attorney-client privilege in front of the jury,” Sussmann’s lawyers contended in a Friday filing.
Durham, is he like the Ken Starr of the 90's?Doubtful. Is he the one that got Clinton impeached, but the Senate voted not to convict? Oh wait, he also investigated the White Water dealings. Durham is not investigating a sitting President that we know of, so no voting required. Just good old fashioned prosecution in front of Judge and Jury most likely. We shall see, but he seems rather methodical, albeit slow. But the mid-terms are coming and the Hildabeast is not a candidate for anything and is still Nacho President so Soldier-On
Also....it's been almost 2 years and no Hunter Biden conviction....I thought that was a slam dunk according to you Trump loving numbnuts Originally Posted by WTFThe FBI has been playing hide-the-salami with it. As I recall, they do not currently even know where it is, after having refused to even receive it for many months. Of course, the LambSCREAMMedia provided a continuous barrage of smoke and mirrors to make it appear invisible the whole time. Don't you get the papers or internets in your cage or did you just figure they were in lieu of a flush toilet?
The FBI has been playing hide-the-salami with it. As I recall, they do not currently even know where it is, after having refused to even receive it for many months. Of course, the LambSCREAMMedia provided a continuous barrage of smoke and mirrors to make it appear invisible the whole time. Don't you get the papers or internets in your cage or did you just figure they were in lieu of a flush toilet? Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_DoBiden Bitches don't watch the news, it reminds them what idiots they were when they voted last presidential election
Doubtful. Is he the one that got Clinton impeached, but the Senate voted not to convict? Oh wait, he also investigated the White Water dealings. Durham is not investigating a sitting President that we know of, so no voting required. Just good old fashioned prosecution in front of Judge and Jury most likely. We shall see, but he seems rather methodical, albeit slow. But the mid-terms are coming and the Hildabeast is not a candidate for anything and is still Nacho President so Soldier-On Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_DoYou keep believing that little buddy
The FBI has been playing hide-the-salami with it. As I recall, they do not currently even know where it is, after having refused to even receive it for many months. Of course, the LambSCREAMMedia provided a continuous barrage of smoke and mirrors to make it appear invisible the whole time. Don't you get the papers or internets in your cage or did you just figure they were in lieu of a flush toilet? Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_DoSuch a wit....I suppose 5 years from now you'll be saying the same nonsense.
I slam dunked my nuts now they are numb Originally Posted by WTF
