It's been answered; maybe not as directly as you wanted, but nobody is saying open borders is good, great, nor that it's making america great again; That's a false conclusion you and others are touting. LEfties here don't think that asylum seekers are necessarily bad, as our country is one that thrived because of diversity and immigration. We are all in agreement that it should be done LEGALLY and not just jumping the border. Not sure anyone is supporting that. Further- the assumption that these border crosssers are going to change the dynamic and voting roles is a ruse at best. Just saying.
Originally Posted by eyecu2
Excysting stute law and international agreements already provide for asylum seekers to apply either at a US embassy or consulate in their home country, or to the government of the first country they enter after leaving their own home.
Everyone at the border who crosses and asks for asylum is jumping the line on everyone else back home who is doing it right.
When my father was born in Hungary, his grandmother applied for a travel visa at the US consulate in his home town of Szeged.
Seventeen years later on he was allowed to travel to New York where he livred with sn uncle. As a resident alien he registered and re-registered at a local post office every year till he turned twenty one and went through the citizenship process.
Half the family that remained in Eastern Europe did not survive WW-II, the Russian occupation that followed or the revolution in 1956. His mother was allowed to leave in the mid 1960s and went through the same resident alein-to-citizen process.
On my wife's side of the family, the story is much the same with variations in detail, and with Venezuela as their country of origin.
Everyone crossing our border and claiming asylum today (or just running into the desert) is jumping the line on everyone else who are following the established procedure as I have described it above.
This alone makes their entry illegal. As a sovereign nation, we have no obligation to accommodate them.