Is the word Negro derogatory....

DG is actually one of my favorite post whores. I also have my favorite assholes on the board (funny enough). I think this thread has been very thorough that the statement was used in a derogatory way! A prejudice way, but there is lots of prejudice on this board. Funny, the only one discussed is race, why is that?
john_deere's Avatar
Derived from the word Negroid. One of the three racial classifications of humans. The others being Caucasoid and Mongoloid. Originally Posted by boardman
this is not correct. it's actually the other way around.

negro is spanish for black. the original slavers to the americas were spanish, and referred to their cargo as blacks.....or negroes.
#2 - Derogatory racial remarks are simply unacceptable, period. Disrespect another's ethnic background and you will most certainly regret it. Originally Posted by Pistolero
But is it the same when you poke fun at your own ethnic group?

Aren't NBA policies disrespectful of a whole ethnic group?
But is it the same when you poke fun at your own ethnic group?

Aren't NBA policies disrespectful of a whole ethnic group? Originally Posted by LilMynx69
I think we should know who is inquiring with us and choose in a different way. Like on p411 the hobbyist puts his age, race and weight on his profile along with likes and dislikes. Here on Eccie you have to ask those General questions. I hate the term "NBA or No Blacks Allowed", it's just ugly. And I still think a woman has a right to choose, but in order to get an idea who is behind the keyboard here we have to ask a few questions. Very good point sexy Mynx!
no, because people are allowed to fuck who they want.

I think some forget that when talking about nba policies...
.......Aren't NBA policies disrespectful of a whole ethnic group? Originally Posted by LilMynx69
no, because people are allowed to fuck who they want.

I think some forget that when talking about nba policies... Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne
You meant to say "providers are allowed to fuck who they want."

People.....would infer AA customers get their choice.
no, because people are allowed to fuck who they want.

I think some forget that when talking about nba policies... Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne
And I agree with that.

I also think that we should be able to poke fun at our own groups.

I think DG's comment is similar to me calling myself a whore. ;-)

(Disclaimer: In the interest of full disclosure, I'm currently not technically a whore...perhaps an Almost Whore, as dearhunter called me, but not a technical whore.)
You meant to say "providers are allowed to fuck who they want."

People.....would infer AA customers get their choice. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter
No, people would imply that people, regardless of the hobby, have the right to make choices about their sexual partners.

It doesn't make sense to state the Daphne inferred that all guys, AA or not, get to pick whoever they want to have sex with regardless of other factors...

xoxo
YourMynx
SpiceItUp's Avatar
Someone had better alert the United Negro College Fund, the Council of Negro Women, and a bunch of other long standing organizations that they're offending people out there in America!

I think it's silly that a black guy gets warning/points for making fun of a NBA hooker by making an obvious joke and using the word negro in it.

I wonder if the mod would have had the same reaction had DG said instead "I bet a black guy stole it". My suspicion is that no, he would not have. If that is the case, this IS about the word used, which isn't even a slur by any reasonable definition.

I can appreciate the need for consistent application of the rules and it's his prerogative obviously but it seems a bit knee jerk
ness's Avatar
  • ness
  • 03-16-2014, 11:04 PM
No, people would imply that people, regardless of the hobby, have the right to make choices about their sexual partners. Originally Posted by LilMynx69
Let's take this to an alternative timeline and say selling snatch was legal, would you (or anyone else, I'm not really singling you out lilminx) say it's ok to violate federal law because it's her pussy? Black, old, take your pick. Maybe that's an argument for keeping it underground? What would team NBA do if they had to play by the law of the land?
SpiceItUp's Avatar
Let's take this to an alternative timeline and say selling snatch was legal, would you (or anyone else, I'm not really singling you out lilminx) say it's ok to violate federal law because it's her pussy? Black, old, take your pick. Maybe that's an argument for keeping it underground? What would team NBA do if they had to play by the law of the land? Originally Posted by ness
They would do the same as thousands of other business owners who discriminate daily for various reasons not just racial. They would keep doing what they're doing they just wouldn't have a posted policy so they could technically stay within the law.

Businesses have the right to refuse service and hire/fire anyone they choose, proving it's discriminatory is a tough row to hoe.
Let's take this to an alternative timeline and say selling snatch was legal, would you (or anyone else, I'm not really singling you out lilminx) say it's ok to violate federal law because it's her pussy? Black, old, take your pick. Maybe that's an argument for keeping it underground? What would team NBA do if they had to play by the law of the land? Originally Posted by ness
Yes, I would actually say it's ok because it's her pussy. I've worked all weekend already, so I'm not in the mood to make a well cited constitutional law argument about it. So, I'd leave it to this.

A pussy is not, nor will it ever be, a public place, regardless of the legal status of prostitution.

It is not illegal for private clubs to discriminate under specific circumstances. It does not violate Fair Housing / Equal Opportunity requirements to advertise for and seek a roommate of a specific sex.

Repeatedly, courts have upheld an individual's right to make decisions regarding their personal and private lives, and who someone fucks will, most likely, remain one of those decisions for a long time.

"No matter how slutty I am, my pussy is NOT a public place."
LMx
SpiceItUp's Avatar
In a future Landmark Supreme Court Case: John Q. Blackguy v. NBA hooker
ness's Avatar
  • ness
  • 03-16-2014, 11:51 PM
It is not illegal for private clubs to discriminate under specific circumstances. Originally Posted by LilMynx69
But we are talking about business! Advertising in hooker world is for a service, it's obviously not a private club. The civial rights act would apply.

Yea I'm mostly playing devil's advocate but if we are going to open up Pandora box lets make everybody squirm!
In a future Landmark Supreme Court Case: John Q. Blackguy v. NBA hooker Originally Posted by SpiceItUp
Lol, now that's just cute!

I agree with Mynx completely, in every establishment there is a sign "we have a right to refuse service to anyone". Prejudice comes in all forms, when I came here I was handed a whole lot! I never knew people really thought that way. I'm happy with my change, so "thank you" assholes! I think Eccie and the prejudice made me look at things differently, nobody should have to fuck who she doesn't want to, and it's personal preference in the end! I hate NBA wording, but Eccie lives by it! It boils down to 2 consenting adults with a friendly business arrangement!