Tylenol link to Autism

...I do take Vitamin D, because my blood levels are on the low side, and Magnesium well below the RDA. Also a garlic supplement, and WYID's immune boosting regimen... Originally Posted by Tiny

Actually, it was the DR Vladimir Zelenko's Z-stack protocol.
Very interesting and relevant on how he came to the final formulation.

Dr. Zelenko:
“Zinc is the bullet – it kills the virus. The only problem is the bullet doesn’t get to the place where it needs to be.

The virus is inside the cell. The enzyme is inside the cell. And the zinc on its own cannot get into the cell. You have a bullet without a gun – useless.

Now, it turns out there’s a class of medications called ‘zinc ionophores’ or a class of substances called ‘zinc ionophores’ — what they do — is they open up a channel, a door, which allows zinc to go from outside the cell to inside the cell.

There are four of them that are readily available – two of them are prescription and two of them are over-the-counter.

The two prescription ones everyone has heard of: Hydroxycholorquine and Ivermection.

They’re the guns that shoot the bullet. The bullet then gets into the cell and stops the virus enzyme from helping the virus replicate.

So you have a gun and bullet. Only the synergy of the two creates a functioning unit.

S in april of last year, Cuomo issued an executive order that was directly targeting me and my patients – because I was the only one in the state doing it. Where pharmacies would not dispense hydroxychloroquine to patients. So all of a sudden, I had a gun and a bullet approach, but…he took away the zinc delivery system — at least he took away access to my patients.

So I was forced by necessity to innovate. I did more research, and on the NIH servers of all places, I found papers saying a substance called quercetin is a zinc delivery system, as well. It’s a zinc ionophore.

To be honest, I’d never heard of quercetin. So I googled it and I see it’s over-the-counter.

That was one of the most significant realizations in my life and probably in humanity.

Why do I say that? Because now there was a cure for tyranny.

Why it's relevant here? Because it's tyranny when you censor scientific inquiry and the government gets in between you and your Doctor. Same is true in this case with Tylenol. You should be able to see all sides and ask good questions with your Doctor - ALWAYS.

She might be dead if RFK Jr ran her over with an 18 wheeler. Regardless, nobody is taking it off the market, unless it where proven to be dangerous. The simple act of raising questions because some studies intimated a possible linkage is known as, uhhm, what's the word? Oh yea! Science. Just ask Fauci.Naah. You are walking into what you thought was an Anime Go-Go bar without wearing your glasses perhaps...

Because if you were wearing your glasses you would have seen the sign above the door that says: Trans-Aime Bar Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

You've spent too much time in Bangkok go go bars WYID. Here where I live, in God's country, there are no trans strippers. And no stinkin animes.

Actually, it was the DR Vladimir Zelenko's Z-stack protocol.
Very interesting and relevant on how he came to the final formulation.Why it's relevant here? Because it's tyranny when you censor scientific inquiry and the government gets in between you and your Doctor. Same is true in this case with Tylenol. You should be able to see all sides and ask good questions with your Doctor - ALWAYS. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Thanks again for linking to Z-stack many moons ago.

Fortunately now we have Paxlovid, so the invermectin/Hydroxycholorquine debate is irrelevant.

As to Tylenol, I of course do not believe it makes sense to censor scientific inquiry or have the government get between you and your doctor. RFK Jr. has different ideas. He doesn't want anything to get between the plaintiffs' lawyers, like him, and big, juicy paychecks.

You've spent too much time in Bangkok go go bars WYID. Here where I live, in God's country, there are no trans strippers. And no stinkin animes. ... Originally Posted by Tiny

He's a good ol' red blood 'murican just like you tiny.

Just ask Elaine. He/she will possibly vouch for that.

ADHD isn’t a real disorder and shouldn’t be part of a legitimate medical conversation.

ADHD isn’t a real disorder and shouldn’t be part of a legitimate medical conversation. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

SO you're a medical professional of some sort? Tell us everything you know about ADHD. Shouldn't take you long to type "nothing."

One year doesn’t do much harm to liver. Ten years more damage to liver.

I know Mom got along quite well with arthritis drugs for about 20 to 25 years and then issues with kidneys and liver. Originally Posted by farmstud60

All of you posting like you know shit about tylenol or anything else...You recognize that you just post your own anecdotal evidence that doesn't mean shit, right? I don't care how many times you stayed in a Holiday Inn, you still don't know shit about medical studies. Your mother got old. Organs having issues can be part of that. There's many things that can cause organ damage.

ADHD isn’t a real disorder and shouldn’t be part of a legitimate medical conversation. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

You'd agree then that drug companies that make and sell acetaminophen shouldn't get sued for causing ADHD.

I wonder if Elon Musk and Bill Gates should sue for their autism. Yeah, Tylenol wasn't really around when Gates was born, but something like that never stopped a plaintiff's lawyer!

All of you posting like you know shit about tylenol or anything else...You recognize that you just post your own anecdotal evidence that doesn't mean shit, right? I don't care how many times you stayed in a Holiday Inn, you still don't know shit about medical studies. Your mother got old. Organs having issues can be part of that. There's many things that can cause organ damage. Originally Posted by fd-guy

People taking daily prescribed doses of NSAID's and Rheumatrex for arthritis have their liver and kidney function monitored regularly. Farmstud's assumption was probably reasonable. Or maybe that's what his Mom's doctor told him.

People taking daily prescribed doses of NSAID's and Rheumatrex for arthritis have their liver and kidney function monitored regularly. Farmstud's assumption was probably reasonable. Or maybe that's what his Mom's doctor told him. Originally Posted by Tiny

Perhaps. I don't see much "reasonable" coming from him, but he didn't specifically mention any medical interventions that proved his statement.

SO you're a medical professional of some sort? Tell us everything you know about ADHD. Shouldn't take you long to type "nothing." Originally Posted by fd-guy

Nope. I’m a grease monkey, but have seen the evaluations many many times and the reactions by people who have forgotten more than you and I combined will ever know. Essentially, the interview consists of determining whether or not the interviewee is a boy. It’d be much more efficient to just check for a penis. Rather than drugging them up, taking away the cell phone and sending them out to cut the grass or play ball would decrease the prevalence by 90%.

You'd agree then that drug companies that make and sell acetaminophen shouldn't get sued for causing ADHD. Originally Posted by Tiny

I’d absolutely agree with that. People are free to make their own decisions but should also be armed with all available information. People smoke cigarettes, if that’s not illegal Tylenol sure as shit shouldn’t be.

Discussion has evolved away from politics in to a "Scientific" discussion.
Moved to Sand box

Nope. I’m a grease monkey, but have seen the evaluations many many times and the reactions by people who have forgotten more than you and I combined will ever know. Essentially, the interview consists of determining whether or not the interviewee is a boy. It’d be much more efficient to just check for a penis. Rather than drugging them up, taking away the cell phone and sending them out to cut the grass or play ball would decrease the prevalence by 90%. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Right. So the answer is you don't know fuck-all about medical issues beyond whatever anecdotal bullshit you think you've observed. Interesting about the grass thing. Maybe you should stop at 10,000 posts on a political forum on a hooker board and go try some of that. Might reduce your ignorant posts by 50%.

Did that for40 years. Nice try tho.

Did that for40 years. Nice try tho. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Well there you go. Guess it doesn't work.

Of the Following . . .

#1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences.
#3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.
#4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.