ATTN Providers – Most Hobbyists Hate Tattoos

Everyone has their preferences and tats or no tats are simply just one more "check box".

Some guys like natural breasts, some don't care. Some guys like large breasts, some guys like small breasts. Some guys like shaved, some guys like trimmed, some guys like natural, some guys don't give a shit. Some guys like blondes, some guys like brunettes, some guys like red heads, most guys don't care. Some guys like spinners, some guys like BBW. Some guys like athletic girls, some guys like soft girls.

It’s a fact that in MOST guys’ opinions, tattoos tend to make a girl look less educated, less pretty, less sexy, cheaper, more ghetto, more trailer trashy, and/or rougher than girls with no tattoos. Of course there are exceptions to everything, such as young guys with no money and plenty of tattoos of their own who will tell you they love tattoos. But guys with money, who are generally older and more educated (the hobbyists who are willing to spend more money on you), view them as a turn-off. I’m one of them and actually willing to pay a premium for girls with no tattoos.

It’s also a fact that popular strip clubs tend to shy away from hiring girls with too many tattoos (or too many girls with lots of tattoos), because they know that the clientele they are trying to attract (guys with money to spend) are turned off by them. So if you’re a stripper with lots of tattoos, and only the trashy clubs will hire you, that’s probably the reason.

I’m sure lots of guys just put up with tattoos because it’s getting harder to find girls who don’t have them. So if you’re a guy who claims you don’t mind them, I would ask, would you prefer your ATF didn’t have them? Originally Posted by Gecko

No, I don't think that tattoos on a girl automatically make them look trailer trashy, less educated or pretty, cheap or ghetto. Yes, I am an older guy, with "money", educated and I don't mind a girl with tattoos at all.

To your last question, My ATF girls all have tattoos to varying degrees and it does not bother me. Some if their tattoos are very sexy and extremely well done and they look very attractive. What I care about is the woman behind the tats, a good session and VFM.


We all like what we like and tats are just a preference like anything else. To say that "most" guys don't like girls with tattoos because the OP does not particularly like them is fairly ignorant and low class, IMHO.

Service, attitude, cleanliness and VFM is what matter to most of us, as long as the SP takes care of herself and does not rip guys off, the rest is just preferences.

You like what you like, choose accordingly.

I know I'm not everyone's cup of tea for whatever reason and that's fine. There's a jack for every jill in this business.

Just because one guy doesn't like tattoos and decides he's going to speak on behalf of MOST men, doesn't make it true. Originally Posted by MsElena

I think it's always best to just speak for yourself.

[QUOTE=LusciousLacy;2256498]My tats are purposely placed in areas that can be covered for upscale social/ black tie events. No sleeves or tit tats. I dont date tat a mans name on my body. My tats are actually artistic.

the very upscale low volume (high class, if you will) providers who have rates exceeding $1000 for social events dont wear any ink.

Ive been attended such events and rates higher than that to attend... on all occassions the gentlemen found it quite exciting that my tats were easily covered in my formal dress and i looked like a classy good girl...... and then when we got bcd.. and exposed the tats it went from good girl to bad girl with tats. Originally Posted by CJ7

You wrote: "...my tats were easily covered in my formal dress and i looked like a classy good girl". So how would you describe what you would have looked like if the tats were NOT covered?

Big deal about the tattoos. I always get a chuckle out of these "old fashioned" johns.

Old timers, times change. Tattoos are common in our society now, get use to it, or find a new hobby.

I don't mind the tats obviously, I like my hookers to look like hookers, ijs

sixx Originally Posted by sixxbach

Hi Sixxbach - you said "I don't mind the tats obviously, I like my hookers to look like hookers." Does that mean girls without tats look less like hookers to you?

I've got two forearm tattoos. One you can't see unless I turn my arm up, and the other is fairly obvious. To be fair, it got larger than intended as it is a no outline half freehand tattoo. Both are based off of drawings I've done, books I've read, and something near and dear to me. I enjoy my tattoos, they are as much a part of me as my scars or freckles.

They're always covered in some fashion (sleeves, a shaw, etc) when I visit clients at hotels. They're recognisable so it just makes sense to cover them up.

I do not make any less money because of my whopping two tattoos. I'm sure maybe someone sees I have two tattoos and an ear piercing and moves onto the next girl, but that does not equate to less money made in the end as someone who likes those things will probably book instead. If I was hurting for business my rates would be lower, or I'd offer a half hour, or something along those lines. But as it stands I do not hurt for business, and even guys who may not like tattoos might see me just because of my reputation/level of service/quality of service. In the end, you're not going to be staring at my forearms for an hour...and if you are, well you're doing it wrong.

I'm sure other guys see my implants and move on, or maybe I'm too skinny and move on, or that my hair is too long or too red and move on. In the end, I still appeal to many and I don't do bad at all. If someone doesn't want to see me because I have a tattoo I honestly don't care. I have never had to lower my rate (which is on the "high end" for my area) to make money. Most of my "rich regulars" as the OP put it, also have tattoos and think mine are 'neat'. As long as I arrive with them covered, they couldn't care less. It's what's under the trenchcoat they care about - and I certainly don't mean my tattoos. Originally Posted by Missy Mariposa

Hi Missy Mariposa - you said "Most of my "rich regulars" as the OP put it, also have tattoos and think mine are 'neat'. As long as I arrive with them covered, they couldn't care less." Why arrive with them covered instead of flaunting them?

Tattoos are identifying characteristics.

I can't believe this needs to be explained to several of you.

Cover up the tats and you just see random girl. Flaunt them through the lobby of a hotel? Guess who just caught the eye of the front desk/valet/security.

[QUOTE=Gecko;2269949]

My tats are purposely placed in areas that can be covered for upscale social/ black tie events. No sleeves or tit tats. I dont date tat a mans name on my body. My tats are actually artistic.


You wrote: "...my tats were easily covered in my formal dress and i looked like a classy good girl". So how would you describe what you would have looked like if the tats were NOT covered? Originally Posted by LusciousLacy

An intelligent woman with exquisite taste not currently surrounded by judgmental people?

I have a question for all the guys who say they love tattoos on a girl: Would you ever NOT see a girl because she DIDN'T have any tats?

Tattoos are identifying characteristics.

I can't believe this needs to be explained to several of you.

Cover up the tats and you just see random girl. Flaunt them through the lobby of a hotel? Guess who just caught the eye of the front desk/valet/security. Originally Posted by SillyGirl

If the girl is hot and she has tattoo's I don't think that will matter much. I don't havve any myself but there are some that are very tactfully done and look good. Others... not so much. Originally Posted by Shayla

And I love that about you.

Tattoo's are not my thing, but unless they are sporting sleeves or some heavy ink I don't really care if they have tattoo's.

I will say that if you can't cover them up you will find it hard to land some professional positions though.

I have a question for all the guys who say they love tattoos on a girl: Would you ever NOT see a girl because she DIDN'T have any tats? Originally Posted by Gecko

Yep. When I'm in the mood to see a little ink, I take a pass on the uninked ladies. Same with metal. It's a preference just like any other. Kind of like, if I'm going to have dinner, will it be beef, chicken or seafood? Just because I choose seafood today doesn't mean that's what I'll have every day.

But to take the dinner analogy a little farther. Your position is that all hobbyists (or the majority) are vegetarians. From your POV you may think you're correct. But the fact of the matter is you are not correct. As many on this board has pointed out. Your dog won't hunt. No matter how hard you try.

[QUOTE=the.namssa;2268129]
No, I don't think that tattoos on a girl automatically make them look trailer trashy, less educated or pretty, cheap or ghetto. Yes, I am an older guy, with "money", educated and I don't mind a girl with tattoos at all. [QUOTE]

Depends on the Tattoo's if it is a home / jail house tat you know the iron cross done with a ball point. . That is pretty hard core and trashy.

Face it your taste determines if I perceive it as trashy or not, but my taste just means you will not book me, however it may be the very thing that attracts the kind of man you do like. ijs

Some are very nice! They really don't bother me, but I don't have any!

When you paint with a broad brush, it's gonna get sloppy. Sweeping generalizations about what everyone likes or doesn't like is like applying red paint with a large broom.

wow, a timex thread ... just keeps on ticking. LOL

for a 1 hr BCD tats are moot. .. Hit it and git. Not a problem for me and seemingly not many more gents either.

for an extended public social event, most have said they cover up the majority of their ink ... ok fine, a snowmobile suit at a LITTLE Black dress event doesnt work for me

some like lots of ink because they like "hookers to look like hookers"

fine, but not for me on the beach at Nassau.

at the end of the day WALDT, thats what makes the world tick like a timex.