This NCNS issue with Coco could be her lack of adequate screening, then getting cold feet just before the date. I don't think she knows who to trust for the best info.
Originally Posted by giteneny
I can honestly say that I've never received a reference request from her....and I am a main source of references in Central Arkansas.
I've had limited board time lately...and haven't had the opportunity so far, but I'd like to weigh in on the issue of where a provider's NCNS info should be shared...IMHO.
In the hobby, I feel that reliability is one of the most important factors... Who really cares how good someone looks, how convincing the illusion of passion or what's on the menu...if they don't even bother to show up or notify you of their inability to keep the date?
We all have busy lives outside of this (reiterating) and unreliability should be reported and
the information should also be easily accessible.
While placing a NCNS in the review section isn't exactly appropriate because no activities took place, there ought to be somewhere to list it...other than a coed discussion thread where it will get buried over time, or overlooked by a less experienced board member.
Perhaps the addition of a NCNS section would solve the problem? And below a provider's review links, her NCNS reports should also be credited to her Eccie profile, via a separate link.
Isn't ease of sharing organized & pertinent hobby information the main purpose of this site?
