Recorded Sessions?

Here's a handy guide
http://www.wirerealm.com/guides/top-...able-recorders

This thread is ever evolving

So we've at least educated folks on the law... ..... Originally Posted by WTF

Professor WTF is still patting himself on the back and declaring his "expertise"!

Professor WTF is still patting himself on the back and declaring his "expertise"! Originally Posted by LexusLover

What i have tried to do is get the truth out to counter your distortions on this one aspect of the law. I do not claim to be an expert on the law in general but i do know this aspect of the law. Anyone who has been through a contentious divorce should know these facts.



.

Edit: forgot to add Fiesta and Mi Tienda...the tamale factory never sleeps and they have the best masa to substitute when los manos de mi abuelita duelen. Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Good masa makes the tamales even better.

But shouldn't this thread get back to the barebacking HIV immune cute puppy?

I retract my previous statement of making smores of on Thai thread. When this thread dies , I'm going to burn it and piss all o we the ashes

What i have tried to do is get the truth out to counter your distortions on this one aspect of the law. Originally Posted by WTF

Actually, the only "truth" you provided is your propensity to record sessions with providers to insure YOUR SAFETY without even knowing your ass from first base about the evidentiary value of any such AUDIO RECORDING and/or the procedural evidentiary hurdles you must overcome to get it admitted into evidence or even attempt to prove it up.

You're not about "truth" ....

....You are about "appearing" to be a "winner" in a discussion even if it means distorting what others say (just like you just did above about what I posted) and then claiming yourself to be "winner" (just like you just did above!).

Like a lot of amateurs on here you cut and past crap from articles and claim you "knew it all along" when you really don't know squat about the topic. And the topic of the use of audio or video recordings in legal proceedings is one of those topics you know little if anything about....and it shows.

What's with the hate towards Natalie?

So what's the verdict? How many newbie hookers have accused Papi of nonconsensual BBFS?

Fuck the recording. I'd think both parties need to agreed to that. It's an invasion of privacy.

Papi continues to proclaim innocence so I figure he's slick and managed to maintain his innocence or is a delusional fuck who continues to act like he's innocent but is unquestionably guilty.

Which is it?

I don't really fucking care. Just curious. You can place all your silly no-consequence judgement on the fucker all you want. Only the ladies can decide to have him banned from being seen altogether.

God damn....with an audio tape and no other information on you ...she can't even claim you were there to a soul because she does not know who you are.


But say you are married with personal information. ..she can claim you were somewhere YOU ACTUALLY WERE. How the fuck are going to prove you were at home when you weren't or at work when you weren't.. so how is it a flat out lie. ..or how are you going to explain to your wife how a hooker knows what size your dick is or if you shave your ass or not. God damn man think.

Personal information is way more dangerous in a hookers hands than a random audio recording . You jave said nothong to bolster your case.

Tell ya what...go fuck a hooker...have then have her call your house and tell your wife where you were and you audio record you explaining to your wife that is a flat out lie and let me hear her reaction. You make it sound so simple....honey that is a flat out lie. Well then where were you? ...and how does she know your dick size?

Come on man a audio recording without any personal information is harmless to you. Originally Posted by WTF

(wtf) Personal information is way more dangerous in a hookers hands than a random audio recording . You jave said nothong to bolster your case.



I think you should go explain that to your friend papi . Because he feels that you can say and do whatever he wants because he gets to hide behind a handle.

Wtf if it was to be legal in the United States to force yourself on a woman provider or not or should I say hooker slut but whatever you want to call her. To put your hands on her after she turns you down. Will you be okay with that too just because the law says is OK? As intelligent as you are after reading what you have post

You literally became one of the most.....

You should ask him about recording secretly recording your clients as a form of protection .

Wtf if it was to be legal in the United States to force yourself on a woman provider or not or should I say hooker slut but whatever you want to call her. To put your hands on her after she turns you down. Will you be okay with that too just because the law says is OK? As intelligent as you are after reading what you have post

You literally became one of the most..... Originally Posted by Azebella_amor

What if....Is that all you got? The law does not say you can put your hands on a woman just because she turns you down. For good reason. The law does say that it is legal to audio record a conversation between two people if you have the consent of one party...and that is for good reason.

If it was legal to slap the shit out of people for asking me dumbass shit, I'd consider it. But probably would refrain because my God damn hand would get tired.

You should ask him about recording secretly recording your clients as a form of protection . Originally Posted by cr76

Not a bad idea...if a provider does it correctly.

What if....Is that all you got? The law does not say you can put your hands on a woman just because she turns you down. For good reason. The law does say that it is legal to audio record a conversation between two people if you have the consent of one party...and that is for good reason.

If it was legal to slap the shit out of people for asking me dumbass shit, I'd consider it. But probably would refrain because my God damn hand would get tired. Originally Posted by WTF

someone must have hacked your account

how about you answer my question and then I'll answer yours.

I ask you directly for your personal opinion if I needed to know what the government or the United States of America have to say I would have googled it.

even though I disagree in recording or audio recording in session it is not as bad as what your client did attorney WTF.

You should ask him about recording secretly recording your clients as a form of protection . Originally Posted by cr76

that will be my next question I think someone must have hacked attorney WTF account or he must be under the weather.

Damn Stella was so hot. What a shame