Inquiries and Impeachment of Trump

WTF! What sane President intentionally tries to get impeached? Originally Posted by Whisky_1

Because "impeached" doesn't mean he is ousted from office!!!!!

When a solid majority of the REGISTERED VOTERS don't want him ousted from office .... why not encourage the LOONS ... and YOU?

YOU and YOURS are too ignorant to realize he's baiting them!!!!

And those LOONS with the LameStreamMedia as cheerleaders are swallowing the bait, hook and all!

Before you enter grammar school you might want to read this book ...



... it should be in the public library near you .. unless the SocialistLiberalAntiTrumpers haven't burned it!

LOL...You seem angry again bro.

But do you have any proof that will stand up in the Senate regarding the supposed "extortion".

If you did, I think it would have been voted on by now. Originally Posted by eccielover

I be been angry since I read the Mueller report, fuck that fat lying bastard.

No, dumbass I don’t have the evidence in my back pocket but you need to get your term straight, Bribery will be the charge. You can’t allow a president be impeached for extortion it makes the Country look bad.

Is there enough evidence to write a article for Abuse of Power ( bribery)?
In my humble opinion there appears to be.

Can the Committee present their evidence of bribery to a uninformed public? I believe pencil neck can do that.

In the famous words of the self proclaimed chosen one “ we’ll see what happens “.

Because "impeached" doesn't mean he is ousted from office!!!!!

When a solid majority of the REGISTERED VOTERS don't want him ousted from office .... why not encourage the LOONS ... and YOU?

YOU and YOURS are too ignorant to realize he's baiting them!!!!

And those LOONS with the LameStreamMedia as cheerleaders are swallowing the bait, hook and all!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

The fat lying bastards defense, but, but, but I released the perfect transcript of the perfect call made by your perfect president. How can they impeach me

Executive Privilege and Impeachment

The Supreme Court has never held that executive privilege applies in the impeachment context. Instead, it created the privilege in the context of a dispute about discovery of communications between President Nixon and White House advisors in a criminal case not aimed at Nixon himself, but at his advisors and campaign staff. Nixon was only an unindicated co-conspirator in that case. Because of the case’s context, the Court focused on balancing the President’s confidentiality interests against the judicial system’s need to reach a just verdict in a criminal case.

In the context of a criminal case, it held that the privilege cannot trump the need to disclose information essential to reaching a just verdict. If executive privilege applied in the impeachment context it could not block disclosure of information essential to the impeachment inquiry. The Supreme Court rejected the notion that executive privilege is an absolute privilege in United States v. Nixon. The case for allowing the executive branch to withhold essential information is even weaker in the impeachment context than in the criminal trial context. Executive privilege cannot prevent disclosure of information essential to resolving the inquiry into whether the House should impeach the President and the Senate should remove him from office.

https://www.acslaw.org/expertforum/e...d-impeachment/

Kinda apple and oranges tricky dicky resigned , and Burglary is a crime so ?

j666- but, but ,but , but , Nixon!!!
LOL

What is foreign aid - but a reward to a country to adjust their behavior towards their people consonant with American values of freedom and democracy????
Every POTUS who has presided over foreign aid awards , and every Congress approving a budget including foreign aid, had done the same "quid pro quo" to foreign countries to change their behavior ( with often poor success) that the DPST's are accusing Trump of doing - and they hypocritically support foreign aid to some of the worst actors on the planet in the name of "Diversity".
It is just a ploy of the the DPST House - which has been planning impeachment since the day after the election of Nov 2016.


even more - it shows the shameless desire of the DPST House - and in the Senate - to take over functions of the Administrative branch - destroy the separation of powers of the Constitution, and rule by DPST fiat as the Supreme Branch of government. It is a very dangerous road they are travelling - but worth it to them if ultimately they get their DPST One Party state of Socialist America.

Every POTUS who has presided over foreign aid awards , and every Congress approving a budget including foreign aid, had done the same "quid pro quo" to foreign countries to change their behavior ( with often poor success) that the DPST's are accusing Trump of doing Originally Posted by oeb11

not the same thing.. Trump acted for the express purpose of obtaining dirt on his political opponent.. you know that. why try to spin this?

What is foreign aid - but a reward to a country to adjust their behavior towards their people consonant with American values of freedom and democracy????
. Originally Posted by oeb11

You are going to make yourself look stupid.

They had already adjusted their behavior according to our military. Trump wanted them to investigate the Biden's for his own political gain.


You might want to read up on the facts and timelines.

DPST's do not want the rocks under which the Bidens and their Party exist to be turned over to the light of day!

What is foreign aid - but a reward to a country to adjust their behavior towards their people consonant with American values of freedom and democracy????
Every POTUS who has presided over foreign aid awards , and every Congress approving a budget including foreign aid, had done the same "quid pro quo" to foreign countries to change their behavior ( with often poor success) that the DPST's are accusing Trump of doing - and they hypocritically support foreign aid to some of the worst actors on the planet in the name of "Diversity"... Originally Posted by oeb11

Yep a president has the power to set his foreign policy as long as he doesn’t commit a crime in doing so. That fat lying bastard committed Bribery and that is clearly written in the Constitution as a impeachable offense.

The cults opinion does not trump the Constitution, get over it.

DPST's do not want the rocks under which the Bidens and their Party exist to be turned over to the light of day! Originally Posted by oeb11

I do.. in fact, I'm irritated that the Republicans didn't care about Biden's possible corruption, until Trump called for a tit-for-tat when the heat was directed his way. like this Horowitz report.. a tit-for-tat that was only drummed up in response to the Impeachment Hearings

The cults opinion does not trump the Constitution, get over it. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

thing is, that is NOT their opinion.. it's their excuse. spin and damage control.. you can bet they are plotting to disrupt tomorrow's testimony.. they are afraid the American people will start learning more.

Risky move, but sometimes you have to do what’s right... Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Then go ahead and give your balls another tug, pigfuck.

not the same thing.. Trump acted for the express purpose of obtaining dirt on his political opponent.. you know that. why try to spin this? Originally Posted by Chung Tran

If the dim-retards wold quit running criminals for office, there would be no "dirt". It's the prescribed, Constitutional duty of the President to enforce this nation's laws even if -- especially WHEN -- the criminal is a high ranking dim-retard who betrayed the public weal.

the Senate will acquit (or not vote, period), regardless of evidence. we all know that, so why ask that question, and make the statement? Originally Posted by Chung Tran

You should direct that question at Jax. EL was.