For those who need proof of election fraud....

Another criminal in Georgia;

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...lection-night/

https://twitter.com/mdeperno/status/...139912193?s=19

7000 affidavits arriving in the Michigan Senate!!!!
BAHAHAHAHA

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...dits/“Fraudits

Have No Place in Colorado” – Democrat Colorado Secretary of State Issues Emergency Rules Prohibiting Election Audits

By Cristina Laila
Published June 17, 2021 at 6:09pm
3088 Comments

Democrat Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold on Thursday announced her office issued emergency rules prohibiting election audits.

“My office just issued rules prohibiting sham election audits in the State of Colorado. We will not risk the state’s election security nor perpetuate The Big Lie. Fraudits have no place in Colorado,” Griswold announced, taking a swipe at the Arizona audit.

In Thursday’s press release, Griswold boasted that Colorado’s elections are considered the “safest in the nation.”

Full statement from Colorado Secretary of State’s office:

The Colorado Secretary of State’s Office today adopted emergency elections rules prohibiting third-parties from accessing voting equipment in the state of Colorado.

“Colorado’s elections are considered the safest in the nation, and we must remain steadfast in our dedication to security,” said Secretary of State Jena Griswold. “Along those lines, no third-party person or vendor will be permitted access to voting equipment in our state. We will not risk the state’s election security nor perpetuate The Big Lie. Sham audits have no place in Colorado.”

The new and amended rules, which have been implemented immediately, reinforce who can access state-certified voting systems. In order to access any component of a county’s voting system, a person must have passed a comprehensive criminal background check and be either an employee of the county clerk, an employee of the voting system provider, an employee of the Secretary of State’s Office, or an appointed election judge.

The rules further enable the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office to limit or prohibit the use of, as well as decertify, any voting systems component in the event of a break in its chain-of-custody or other hardware security compromises, such that its security and integrity can no longer be verified.

A third-party vendor with no election experience is currently performing a faulty, unsecure election audit in Arizona and calls for such sham audits have been spreading in other states. Several Colorado counties have been contacted by third parties offering to conduct audits. Colorado already administers post-election Risk Limiting Audits after every statewide election, which gives a statistical level of confidence that the outcome of an election is correct.

did you watch Ruby (purple shirt) was doing? she scanned the same batch of ballots 3 times.

you can't tell? you really have myopia. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

I can understand she would have to do it if the machine was jamming, but it didn't look like it was. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

TRUMP’S CLAIM: That workers scanned some batches of ballots multiple times.

STERLING’S EXPLANATION: When a scanning machine encounters a problem, it stops, but a few ballots get through while it’s stopping. When that happens, workers take the ballots and scan them again so they’re counted properly. This is standard procedure, and the ballots aren’t counted twice — and if they were, the hand recount Georgia conducted would have shown it.

“That audit showed that there was no problem with the machine scanning,” Mr. Sterling said. “If somebody took a stack of ballots and scanned them multiple times, you would have a lot of votes with no corresponding ballots.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/04/u...ion-fraud.html

Audit officials in Georgia did 3 recounts. The last was a hand recount. All 3 confirmed the original results. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

well, if it was jamming, she would have to reset the machine to clear the counter and restart. it didn't look like she reset it.

It doesn’t matter what you think. Ruby Freeman and her daughter were subpoenaed. That’s serious stuff Speedy. When does a canary sing? Originally Posted by bambino

I re-watched the video, it looks like the yellow shirt was doing it too.

she scanned the ballots twice before dropping it into the box. she may have done the first one in the previous frame not shown in the video. the ones she did may have been 2nd and 3rd iterations of the scan. again I didn't see any motion to reset the counter on those machines.

if these machines were prone to jamming, why the hell did they buy it in the first place?

well, if it was jamming, she would have to reset the machine to clear the counter and restart. it didn't look like she reset it. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

I watched the video again and since I am unfamiliar with the scanning process of ballots I can't say yes or no to any act of voter fraud. This video you shared is the ONLY evidence presented of ballots being rescanned. This would be big news yet no other people claimed it to be true. But there are several accusations of illegal ballots being counted, all refuted.

Ballots were hand-counted during the third Georgia audit. The hand-count and the machine count matched. That is difficult to argue against. The Governor of Georgia is Republican, as is the Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger who oversaw the election results and swears that the results were correct. Again, hard to argue against.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...dits/“Fraudits

Have No Place in Colorado” – Democrat Colorado Secretary of State Issues Emergency Rules Prohibiting Election Audits

By Cristina Laila
Published June 17, 2021 at 6:09pm
3088 Comments

Democrat Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold on Thursday announced her office issued emergency rules prohibiting election audits.

“My office just issued rules prohibiting sham election audits in the State of Colorado. We will not risk the state’s election security nor perpetuate The Big Lie. Fraudits have no place in Colorado,” Griswold announced, taking a swipe at the Arizona audit.

In Thursday’s press release, Griswold boasted that Colorado’s elections are considered the “safest in the nation.”

Full statement from Colorado Secretary of State’s office:

The Colorado Secretary of State’s Office today adopted emergency elections rules prohibiting third-parties from accessing voting equipment in the state of Colorado.

“Colorado’s elections are considered the safest in the nation, and we must remain steadfast in our dedication to security,” said Secretary of State Jena Griswold. “Along those lines, no third-party person or vendor will be permitted access to voting equipment in our state. We will not risk the state’s election security nor perpetuate The Big Lie. Sham audits have no place in Colorado.”

The new and amended rules, which have been implemented immediately, reinforce who can access state-certified voting systems. In order to access any component of a county’s voting system, a person must have passed a comprehensive criminal background check and be either an employee of the county clerk, an employee of the voting system provider, an employee of the Secretary of State’s Office, or an appointed election judge.

The rules further enable the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office to limit or prohibit the use of, as well as decertify, any voting systems component in the event of a break in its chain-of-custody or other hardware security compromises, such that its security and integrity can no longer be verified.

A third-party vendor with no election experience is currently performing a faulty, unsecure election audit in Arizona and calls for such sham audits have been spreading in other states. Several Colorado counties have been contacted by third parties offering to conduct audits. Colorado already administers post-election Risk Limiting Audits after every statewide election, which gives a statistical level of confidence that the outcome of an election is correct.

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

That is a good rule. Companies like the Cyber Ninjas, owned by a man who believes that Trump lost in Arizona due to fraud, should not be allowed to conduct such audits.

Jena Griswold is not saying election audits should not be done. She is saying election audits should be done by reputable people, not companies like the Cyber Ninjas.

People involved with election fraud should face long jail time, or worse.

I watched the video again and since I am unfamiliar with the scanning process of ballots I can't say yes or no to any act of voter fraud. This video you shared is the ONLY evidence presented of ballots being rescanned. This would be big news yet no other people claimed it to be true. But there are several accusations of illegal ballots being counted, all refuted.

Ballots were hand-counted during the third Georgia audit. The hand-count and the machine count matched. That is difficult to argue against. The Governor of Georgia is Republican, as is the Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger who oversaw the election results and swears that the results were correct. Again, hard to argue against. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

theres also the possibility that the election officials were lying about the results of the audit just to avoid an in-depth audit.

It just keeps pouring in;

https://thetruedefender.com/solomon-...ounty-missing/

People involved with election fraud should face long jail time, or worse. Originally Posted by bambino

Agreed. Begin with Trump and work your way down to the street level. They've been involved with voter fraud since last summer. All day every day.

"Or worse?????"



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Agreed. Begin with Trump and work your way down to the street level. They've been involved with voter fraud since last summer. All day every day.

"Or worse?????"



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You said it. Sit back and watch.

theres also the possibility that the election officials were lying about the results of the audit just to avoid an in-depth audit. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Really? At some point you have to put just a little bit of trust in others, even if they come up with an answer you don't like.

It just keeps pouring in;

https://thetruedefender.com/solomon-...ounty-missing/ Originally Posted by bambino

I'm really going to trust The True Defender. Not. A real reliable source of information. A guy "suggests" ballots are missing and you hop all over it.

Overall, we rate The True Defender Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience and a lack of transparency, the use of poor sources, and false claims.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-true-defender/