Recorded Sessions?

You should quote those "new laws" . Originally Posted by TryWeakly

You should figure out how to Google. Might keep you from saying a lot of stupid shit.



“A person commits an offense of unlawful disclosure of intimate images if without the effective consent of the depicted person, the person intentionally discloses visual material depicting another person with the person’s intimate parts exposed or engaged in sexual conduct.”

Senate Bill 1135 was introduced by State Senator Sylvia Garcia (D) of Houston in March and signed into law in mid-June.



.

You're the one boasting about new laws.... why google it when it is so easy just to get you to do it fer me, puppet?

(Is that stupid?)

You're the one boasting about new laws.... why google it when it is so easy just to get you to do it fer me, puppet?

(Is that stupid?) Originally Posted by TryWeakly

boasting about new laws? Wtf you talking about? Ain't nobody boasting.

But the laws have changed since you "accidentally" bumped this two year old thread!



.

Then it's a good thing you bumped it again to provide your new research findings....right puppet?

You're the one boasting about new laws.... why google it when it is so easy just to get you to do it fer me, puppet?

(Is that stupid?) Originally Posted by TryWeakly

Back-tracking so you try not to sound as stupid as you did before is stupid. I work with a dumbass "know-it-all" who does that all the time. He's short sighted and comes up with the "I meant to do that" line in the end. But his face reads like a Dr. Seuss book.

Ya...OK.. what should I do then, El Capitán?

You shoulda stfu a while back. Go bump another 2 year old thread "accidently"



.

Tell me again what was it you were banned for a year, for? You keep dodging that question.... like usual.

Whew! Good thing I am just a "broke ass black boy faggot"....... Originally Posted by TryWeakly

Tell me again what was it you were banned for a year, for? . Originally Posted by TryWeakly

Bitch slapping a ''broke ass black boy faggot".

But no need to worry, I've learned my lesson!

You can bump all the two year old threads you want. You're safe from my wrath...


.

Tell me again what was it you were banned for a year, for? You keep dodging that question.... like usual. Originally Posted by TryWeakly

Tell me again what was it you were banned for a year, for? You keep dodging that question.... like usual. Originally Posted by TryWeakly

Still dodging it?

Back-tracking so you try not to sound as stupid as you did before is stupid. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

The one "back-tracking" is WTF. In an effort to appear correct he has omitted a critical FACT ... the conversation in the thread included a mixing of video recording and audio recording and used the word "recording" .... then a mod stepped in and said the thread was about "audio recording" disregarding the number of times posters talked about "video" BEFORE I made a comment.

WTF is infamous for "drawing his own conclusions" from what people don't say and/or their silence. Look at his signature line! A False Conclusion.

Where's the "admission"? There isn't one! Period.

Unfortunately, mods apparently are not concerned with false statements made about people when they are used to "out" someone and/or vilify them on Eccie.

Still dodging it? Originally Posted by TryWeakly

Of course!

First time ever that I have heard someone record a transaction with a whore.

I have heard of guys secretly videotaping sessions, or of providers/establishments secretly taping sessions too for security and whatnot.

First time, though, of a fucktard making evidence of his own illegal transaction.

Probably should change your name to the retarded papi. Originally Posted by Asianhobbyist

At this point I had not posted anything in this thread. Post #27.

11-01-2015, 12:18 AM #11

. Why do I voice record session? Originally Posted by the cute papi

Quit giving legal advice. And you need to get your "facts straight" ....

.. since you want to be a lawyer on here ... my suggestion is you not change the scenario facts to fit your "legal argument" ...

This thread is about hobbyists and providers VIDEO TAPING sex sessions!

"! Originally Posted by LexusLover

I got the facts straight....in post #11 cutepapi said as much.

He clearly stated Audio recording.

I posted a link where a provider audio recorded a session where a Vice officer arrested her without her agreeing to a sexual act for money and where the officer can be heard saying "How are they going to believe, you or me?"

Which led to the DA dismissing the charge.


Not sure why you two are bumping an old thread where LexusLover was clearly caught lying yet again.




.