Recorded Sessions?

11-01-2015, 12:18 AM #11




I got the facts straight....in post #11 cutepapi said as much.

He clearly stated Audio recording.

I posted a link where a provider audio recorded a session where a Vice officer arrested her without her agreeing to a sexual act for money and where the officer can be heard saying "How are they going to believe, you or me?"

Which led to the DA dismissing the charge.


Not sure why you two are bumping an old thread where LexusLover was clearly caught lying yet again.




. Originally Posted by WTF

He did? Clearly?

He did? Clearly? Originally Posted by TryWeakly

Quote:
11-01-2015, 12:18 AM #11 Originally Posted by the cute papi
. Why do I voice record session?



Yes and then your buddy LexusLover tried to say that the discussion was about audio...

Are you stalking my old threads?

He did? Clearly? Originally Posted by TryWeakly

I'm unconcerned about WTF's opinion about anything. The only issue is when he starts falsely accusing someone of being LE or an LE snitch then he is placing them in jeopardy of serious bodily injury or death ... particularly in these days and times.

Some duffus posts an "alert" that a provider "no showed" or stood him up ... and WTF is falsely accusing people (me specifically) of being LE or an LE snitch .... and doesn't seem to bother the mods!

"Lying" ... apparently he can't read at ALL!

First time ever that I have heard someone record a transaction with a whore.

I have heard of guys secretly videotaping sessions, or of providers/establishments secretly taping sessions too for security and whatnot.

First time, though, of a fucktard making evidence of his own illegal transaction.

Probably should change your name to the retarded papi. Originally Posted by Asianhobbyist

At this point I had not posted anything in this thread. Post #27. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I'll make it BIGGER! (Like a Big Chief tablet!)

I hadn't posted yet ... and I don't care what "Papi" said before Post #27 .... there were numerous posts after that stating ...


See LexusLover Post #626
https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...post1057412589

WTF has no life! And he just makes up shit.

#1: By "showed them the recording" .... was it a video?
#2: Did "the police" happen to mention to you it was a "civil matter"? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Tell us,,, How do you use a recording of an illegal transaction to protect yourself?
Judge Fairman,,,I recorded the whore because we agreed to a bare back blow job
for x amount of money for 30 minutes and a greek salad. She pooped on me during
the serving of the salad Sir. She wouldn't give me a portion of the money back,,,
called the police and showed them the recording,,,
I still haven't figured out how this protects anyone,,, Originally Posted by Guest040816

Dear Little Boy .... #1 ... the mention of video/spy cams was brought up before I began posting about "recording" sessions. #2 ... Fortunately the World (this one and the real one) doesn't revolve around YOU! #3 ... YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT FROM SHINOLA ABOUT PRACTICING CRIMINAL LAW. #4 .. Your LAMEASS attempt to paint me as "LE" with your slimy, ignorant innuendos shows the depths of your classlessness and ugliness, when anybody on this board who knows me or knows of me recognizes I am not LE.

You are the one who has advocated (and still are) providers recording sessions "for their own protection" ... and you give a news report in the Houston Chronicle as the basis for your LEGAL ADVICE for providers to do so.

From that it can easily be PRESUMED that you advocate HOBBYISTS recording their sessions with PROVIDERS .... and therefore you support what PAPPI was doing, since he asserts he was doing so "for his own protection."

When the authors of the Bill of Rights got finished with the Fourth Amendment they crafted the Fifth Amendment just for Little Boys like you. Then they crafted the Sixth Amendment to assure that Little Boys like you that can't keep their ignorant mouths shut would be guarantied a lawyer.

You are obviously not a lawyer. You should not be practicing law by giving legal advice. In Texas practicing law without a license is a serious matter, not only for the unwary consumers of the advice, but also the community as a whole. Contrary to YOUR CHARACTERIZATION of what you are doing it is "practicing law" when you give someone advice concerning their "legal rights"!

You've made your posts about you. Your over-inflated responses reflect your lack of self-esteem and desire to appear intellectually superior to others in an effort, apparently, to overcome your own deficiencies as a person.

Unless you want to put your money where your mouth is ... with either professional liability insurance for legal malpractice or a slush defense fund for the providers who are actually dumb enough to take your advice, then you should probably go sit on the bench and keep quiet. 5th Amendment. But you won't.

My RECOMMENDATION to providers and hobbyists alike is they spend a few bucks (about the cost of one session) on a lawyer referred by the Houston Bar Association referral service (not some other similarly situated person) as having special knowledge in the area of surreptitious video/audio recordings as it relates to criminal law and civil liability and meet with that "expert" and discuss the matter in depth. The conversation will be privileged and therefore remain private and protected. General suggestion: Request a fee contract with the attorney spelling out the expense and scope of the employment and retain a fully signed copy. Originally Posted by LexusLover

TW .... he's beating a dead horse! Like all his other bullshit.

He is still a puppet, too.

Next!

Two years ago!vvvvvvvvv

LL to WTF:
Your LAMEASS attempt to paint me as "LE" with your slimy, ignorant innuendos shows the depths of your classlessness and ugliness, when anybody on this board who knows me or knows of me recognizes I am not LE.

You are the one who has advocated (and still are) providers recording sessions "for their own protection" ... and you give a news report in the Houston Chronicle as the basis for your LEGAL ADVICE for providers to do so.

From that it can easily be PRESUMED that you advocate HOBBYISTS recording their sessions with PROVIDERS .... and therefore you support what PAPPI was doing, since he asserts he was doing so "for his own protection."



TW .... he's beating a dead horse! Like all his other bullshit. I would not classify you as a horse, more like a jackass. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I said it was legal to audio record the session without the other persons consent or knowledge. . I gave an example of where a provider did so and because she did, the DA dropped the charges. Those are facts. If you or other want to consider that legal advice, fine by me.


.

Puppet

Puppet Originally Posted by TryWeakly

When does his Master appear?

Puppeteer Originally Posted by TryWeakly

FIFY

I'm unconcerned about WTF's opinion about anything. The only issue is when he starts falsely accusing someone of being LE or an LE snitch then he is placing them in jeopardy of serious bodily injury or death ... particularly in these days and times.
! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Oh my, seriously bodily injury or death!

Lions and Tiger and Bears , Oh My!

Are you scared some provider is going to beat you up?



If so , quit acting like a lil bitch.

FIFY





Oh my, seriously bodily injury or death!

Lions and Tiger and Bears , Oh My!

Are you scared some provider is going to beat you up?


If so , quit acting. I am a lil bitch. Originally Posted by WTF

Fixed

Fixed Originally Posted by TryWeakly

That was "easy"!

Just curious ... if not "serious bodily injury or death" ...

.. then what?

"No pussy"!

Sometimes it is just "too easy" ....

Sometimes it is just "too easy" .... Originally Posted by TryWeakly

... yes, and I hate saying "no" when they call!

(Sorry I added text after posting. I do that sometimes.)