what was this thread about? oh yes some libtard hack trying to make a case about Reagan and Benghazi. FAIL. Why? it was Clinton that ordered a lowering of security for the Embassy and Obama did not intervene, probably tacitly approved of it. if fits his agenda.You're a fucking idiot. You cannot read. Nowhere in the article I cited did it ever blame Reagan for anything. It's an article about how different the political climate is now versus then. You're too stupid to realize that and ironically, it's the very change in political climate that it references that influences your fucking disdain.
this dog won't hunt. Reagan at no time ever prior to the barracks bombing ordered a lowering of security. Neither did his Secretary of State. the middle east command bears the blame for any lowering in security posture, not the Reagan administration.
contrast that with Clinton's deliberate actions, all known and documented, ordering a lessor security posture during a known volatile situation, her refusal to allow a General to act to defend the Embassy with a strike force that could have been there in a few hours. as i recall that General nearly disobeyed that order and probably regrets it to this day even if it would have certainly ended his career.
once again Woomby searches the interwebs desperately trying to find every libtard hack job article in a vain attempt to pump up pantsuit Hillary and once again fails. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
There was never any stand down order. That has been proven demonstrably false. There was nothing to be done. You've seen too many movies.
Here's Fox News, your very favorite, telling you there was no stand down order, you fucking lying piece of WaKKKo shit.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/11/21...op-controlled/