Who Leaked The Supreme Court Draft?

Yes-- it is up to the courts to decide.. but there's another aspect.


Unless you have a chucklefuck dumb enough to either admit they wanted to sway the judge-- or they have a sign to that effect... any decent lawyer can get that tossed out of court. THEN-- the person is likely to sue for having their 1A rights violated.



Its a massive expense all along the line..


Now-- as soon as those protestors breach either the SCOTUS or someones personal home-- arrest every last one of em. Fair is fair.

Yes-- it is up to the courts to decide.. but there's another aspect.


Unless you have a chucklefuck dumb enough to either admit they wanted to sway the judge-- or they have a sign to that effect... any decent lawyer can get that tossed out of court. THEN-- the person is likely to sue for having their 1A rights violated. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

What exactly do you think they are protesting? Why do you think they picked the judges that are listed on the majority draft and not the others? Do you think they just ended up outside of the judges home because they just want to say "Good job"?

Please a first year law student could get a conviction... what do you think these signs mean?

There is only one sign out of the bunch that could get a conviction.. the "Don't like me at your house" one.


The rest-- a decent lawyer could get tossed out without much of a problem.


As I said before-- you and I might know full well their intent-- but it has to be proven in court and 1A makes that a very delicate minefield.

As I said before-- you and I might know full well their intent-- but it has to be proven in court and 1A makes that a very delicate minefield. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

Again.. let the Jury decide that question. But first arrest these fcukers.

Grace is back in the political forum! Hooray! The collective brain trust here just jumped by about 140 IQ points.

Grace is back in the political forum! Hooray! The collective brain trust here has just jumped by about 140 IQ points. Originally Posted by Tiny

Don't get excited-- I'm stuck at home with COVID this week and just have a lot of spare time on my hands since my spring semester just ended.

What exactly do you think they are protesting? Why do you think they picked the judges that are listed on the majority draft and not the others? Do you think they just ended up outside of the judges home because they just want to say "Good job"?

Please a first year law student could get a conviction... what do you think these signs mean?





Originally Posted by texassapper

I wrote a couple of days ago that members of the left promote abortion and I was called a liar. These pictures demonstrate that I was right (but we knew that already). Plus, we have member of the media that says she would have sex with the leaker and if she became pregnant, she would HAPPILY have an abortion. Can't get much more radical than that.

Promote abortion?

They want the option to terminate unwanted pregnancies. Jesus, do you really want to hold a gun to a womans head and force her to carry to term?

What kind of Conserative thinking is that? You fancy yourself a Conserative, right?


As far as the protesters go...Let them March!

What red blooded American is against peaceful protest? A fucking sign never killed anyone!

you amuse me little precious. your claim is horseshit. you know perfectly well that the free beacon and singer dropped out before Steele was hired.


Fusion had been hired to get information on Trump during the primaries by a Republican media firm, Washington Free Beacon. When Trump became the Republican nominee, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party began picking up the tab for the Fusion research. Fusion owner Glenn Simpson hired Steele, a Russia expert, to gather information from his sources in Russia.


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/crime-c...steele-n897506


The Trump Dossier: What We Know and Who Paid for It


Who paid for it?

During the Republican primaries, a research firm called Fusion GPS was hired by The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website, to unearth potentially damaging information about Mr. Trump. The Free Beacon — which was funded by a major donor supporting Mr. Trump’s rival for the party’s nomination, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida — told Fusion GPS to stop doing research on Mr. Trump in May 2016, as Mr. Trump was clinching the Republican nomination.


After Mr. Trump secured the nomination, Fusion GPS was hired on behalf of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign and the D.N.C. by their law firm, Perkins Coie, to compile research about Mr. Trump, his businesses and associates — including possible connections with Russia. It was at that point that Fusion GPS hired Mr. Steele, who has deep sourcing in Russia, to gather information.


Does it matter who paid for it?

That depends on precious_b's politics bahahhahaaaa


Republicans have criticized the dossier since it was first publicly disseminated when BuzzFeed published it in January. Mr. Trump has blasted it as “fake news” and “phony stuff,” and alleged that it is part of a broader witch hunt intended to cast doubt on his victory. His allies now contend that the allegations in the dossier are discredited by the fact that it was funded at least partially by the Clinton campaign and the D.N.C. Mr. Trump asserted in October in an interview with Fox Business Network’s “Lou Dobbs Tonight” that the Democrats’ payments for the research were “the real collusion.”


Democrats argue that who paid for the research is irrelevant to the veracity of its claims, which they say should be thoroughly investigated. Yet some of the Democrats who funded the dossier have been wary of being associated with it. The lead Perkins Coie lawyer representing both the campaign and the D.N.C., Marc Elias, pushed back earlier this year when asked whether his firm was the client for the dossier, whether he possessed it before the election and whether he was involved in efforts to encourage media outlets to write about its contents.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/25/u...-expained.html


the look Vlad Putin makes when he reads Precious_b's posts


Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Aww. From authoritative, to condoning, to temper tantrum, now treating like a child. None of these deliveries of yours has supplied any proof that your girly Hilly was the first one to give $$$ to Fusion for opposition research. Not a single one. You are so fixed on not looking at who started the ball rolling that got to the point of that document. I have no cares on the path to this glorious side-sticking piece of paper that you so don't want to believe started at its very roots with conservative cash.

You are trying to make the argument that all research that was funded from a person is thrown away when they stop paying. Fusion is very forthcoming stating that it sells its work to many buyers. Regardless of party. And just as the name says, reasearch is always looking for new data so as to make itself more attractive to future buyers. They don't just start from scratch for every new client.

You would be an idiot to say that.

So, you have two outs now that I think about it.
1. Shut me up and show where the libtards paid money to fusion first for the Opp Research
2. Proof that Fusion starts from scratch every research project for each individual client that wants the same subject studied.

So, I stick to the fact that you have yet to prove false that your boys coughed up the money first that eventually lead to that nice paper that i've gotten so much comic relief from seeing y'all cringe.



Till you can prove me wrong by finding Libbys paying before Singer....

Awww. Hurt your little feelings because your temper tantrums can't deflect what I stated is true about the ......Drum Roll.....Steele Dossier came about from the initial funding by a conservative?... Originally Posted by Precious_b

So? Though I do not believe Steele was involved at the time. Regardless, so what? They didn't leak it to the FBI and claim Russia, Russia, Russia from the roof tops or hack into the Trump servers and the transition team servers and the White House servers and forge the logs. You know who did. It's OK, you can tell us. We already know. Durham already told us, in court and they will have to deal with the consequences. Felony consequences as I recall.


Well... assuming they don't nuke the whole world in their cover up operation. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Nasty habit y'all have of quoting out of context.
Maybe if you'd read the whole thing you wouldn't be so confused.

I make no reference to leaks, FBI, Russia, or hacking.

I only state the Steele Dossier started with the initial monies from those of donnys party. Your buddies won't supply proof that Hilly put up the cash first. That makes them extremely butthurt. They just gotta learn to

...to the rest of y'all:
Sorry about my postings that ain't about a leak.
....though a guilty pleasure would be the embarrassment of certain people if a peepee tape existed.
I always try to respond to those that quote me.

Carry on.

I wrote a couple of days ago that members of the left promote abortion and I was called a liar. These pictures demonstrate that I was right (but we knew that already). Plus, we have member of the media that says she would have sex with the leaker and if she became pregnant, she would HAPPILY have an abortion. Can't get much more radical than that. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Just choose your words wisely. Next step to being a good writer.

Please. Your pupils deserve it.

Promote abortion?

They want the option to terminate unwanted pregnancies. Jesus, do you really want to hold a gun to a womans head and force her to carry to term?

What kind of Conserative thinking is that? You fancy yourself a Conserative, right?


As far as the protesters go...Let them March!

What red blooded American is against peaceful protest? A fucking sign never killed anyone! Originally Posted by WTF

I'm working on the mooks' vocabulary and compression. Sappy did the right thing. Just moved on when I asked how he connected the dots to men having babies.

Aww. From authoritative, to condoning, to temper tantrum, now treating like a child. None of these deliveries of yours has supplied any proof that your girly Hilly was the first one to give $$$ to Fusion for opposition research. Not a single one. You are so fixed on not looking at who started the ball rolling that got to the point of that document. I have no cares on the path to this glorious side-sticking piece of paper that you so don't want to believe started at its very roots with conservative cash.

You are trying to make the argument that all research that was funded from a person is thrown away when they stop paying. Fusion is very forthcoming stating that it sells its work to many buyers. Regardless of party. And just as the name says, reasearch is always looking for new data so as to make itself more attractive to future buyers. They don't just start from scratch for every new client.

You would be an idiot to say that.

So, you have two outs now that I think about it.
1. Shut me up and show where the libtards paid money to fusion first for the Opp Research
2. Proof that Fusion starts from scratch every research project for each individual client that wants the same subject studied.

So, I stick to the fact that you have yet to prove false that your boys coughed up the money first that eventually lead to that nice paper that i've gotten so much comic relief from seeing y'all cringe.



Till you can prove me wrong by finding Libbys paying before Singer....

Originally Posted by Precious_b

From October 2015 to May 2016, the Washington Free Beacon hired Fusion GPS to conduct opposition research on "multiple candidates" during the 2016 presidential election, including Donald Trump. The Free Beacon stopped funding this research when Donald Trump had clinched the Republican nomination.[9] Fusion GPS would later hire former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and produce a dossier alleging links between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. Paul Singer, a billionaire and hedge fund manager, who is a major donor to the Free Beacon, said he was unaware of this dossier until it was published by BuzzFeed News in January 2017.[10] On October 27, 2017, the Free Beacon publicly disclosed that it had hired Fusion GPS, and stated that it "had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele."[11]





poor little precious b blind and dumb as can be.



BAHHHHAAHHAAAAAA

Nasty habit y'all have of quoting out of context.
Maybe if you'd read the whole thing you wouldn't be so confused.

I make no reference to leaks, FBI, Russia, or hacking.

I only state the Steele Dossier started with the initial monies from those of donnys party. Your buddies won't supply proof that Hilly put up the cash first. That makes them extremely butthurt. They just gotta learn to
Originally Posted by Precious_b

The dossier, leaked by BuzzFeed News in January 2017,[12] without its author's permission,[13][14][15][16][17] is an unfinished 35-page compilation of raw intelligence[18][19] based on information from anonymous sources known to the author, counterintelligence specialist[20] Christopher Steele.[21] Steele, a former head of the Russia Desk for British intelligence (MI6), was writing the report for the private investigative firm Fusion GPS, who were paid by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC).[22] The dossier's 17 reports allege that Trump campaign members and Russian operatives had conspired to cooperate in Russia's election interference to benefit Trump.[23] It also alleges that Russia sought to damage Hillary Clinton's candidacy.[24] BuzzFeed's decision to publish the reports without verifying their allegations was criticized by journalists[25][26] and defended by a court ruling.[27]



BAAHHHHAAAAA

The dossier, [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_leak"]leaked/URL] by [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BuzzFeed_News"]BuzzFeed News[/URL in January 2017,URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#cite_note-Bensinger_1/10/2017-12"][12][/URL without its author's permission,URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#cite_note-Senate_8/18/2020-13"][13][/URL[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#cite_note-Ewing_11/22/2019-14"][14][/URL[15][URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#cite_note-Scheuermann_Schmitt_2/7/2019-16"][16][/URL[17] is an unfinished 35-page compilation of raw intelligence[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#cite_note-Gross_Simpson_Fritsch_11/26/2019-18"][18][/URL[19] based on information from anonymous sources known to the author, counterintelligence specialist[20] Christopher Steele.[21] Steele, a former head of the Russia Desk for British intelligence (MI6), was writing the report for the [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_intelligence_agency"]private investigative firm[/URLFusion GPS, who were paid by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee[/URL (DNC).[22] The dossier's 17 reports allege that Trump campaign members and Russian operatives had conspired to cooperate in Russia's election interference to benefit Trump.[23] It also alleges that Russia sought to damage Hillary Clinton's candidacy.[24] BuzzFeed's decision to publish the reports without verifying their allegations was criticized by journalists[25][26] and defended by a court ruling.[27]



BAAHHHHAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

You see, everybody. This is The Wiki Kid at his retraction best.

URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_leak"]leaked

by BuzzFeed News in January 2017,[12] without its author's permission,[13][14][15][16][17] is an unfinished 35-page compilation of raw intelligence[18][19] based on information from anonymous sources known to the author, counterintelligence specialist[20] Christopher Steele.[21] Steele, a former head of the Russia Desk for British intelligence (MI6), was writing the report for the private investigative firm Fusion GPS, who were paid by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC).[22] The dossier's 17 reports allege that Trump campaign members and Russian operatives had conspired to cooperate in Russia's election interference to benefit Trump.[23] It also alleges that Russia sought to damage Hillary Clinton's candidacy.[24] BuzzFeed's decision to publish the reports without verifying their allegations was criticized by journalists[25][26] and defended by a court ruling.[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#cite_note-Shafer_12/22/2018-27"][27][/URL