Really? So he is going to walk away with twenty five million. Not bad for a sexual predator. Originally Posted by R.M.Asking a woman up for drinks is now considered the actions of a sexual predator?
.
One woman filed a complaint against O'Reilly because he characterized her comments as "hysterical" when she was a guest on his show. She said it was sexist to use that word in reference to a woman. O'Reilly said nonsense and never invited her back on his show. So.... that constitutes actionable sexual harassment? Seriously? What the fuck is wrong with people?
Just another bullshit way for the left to impose Political Correctness run amok! Originally Posted by lustylad
Now what say you about big pharma and protection from lawsuits? ... You suppress lawsuits a (sic) guess what....comoanies (sic) start cutting corners to make more bucks. Originally Posted by WTFWhat are "comoanies"? Is that something you and assup offer down at the gloryholes? You hum and "co-moan" together?
http://www.lawyerlocator.com/mass-to...efective-drugs
Ever heard of the Food and Drug Administration, dickhead? It's been around since 1906. Your tax dollars at work, paying bureaucrats to ensure the safety and efficacy of new drugs. Why do we need tort lawyers if the FDA is doing its job? If an FDA-approved drug is harmful, then sue the FDA, not the drugmaker!
Those fucking tort lawyers don't go after the guilty parties anyway, you gullible dipshit. They just get real creative trying to pin liability for anything and everything on whoever has the deepest pockets. Originally Posted by lustylad
What you do not understand about a economic eco system, you need tort lawyers.....Did you see Tucker Carlson last night? The pharmaceutical industry has gotten filthy rich off your plan of no checks and balances.This is wtf happens when you tie the hand of tort lawyers. You have bullshit like this going on. You're an idiot to think big business will protect the common man from harmful product.
http://www.ageofautism.com/2017/04/dachel-wake-up-robert-kennedy-jr-interview-with-tucker-carlson.html
Robert Kennedy, Jr. began by stating, “I’ve read the science, and the science is very clear—what you have to understand is that the vaccine regime changed dramatically around 1989. The reason it changed is that Congress, drowning in pharmaceutical industry money, did something they’ve never done for any other industry, they gave blanket legal immunity to all the vaccine companies so that no matter how sloppy the line protocol, or how absent the quality control, no matter how toxic the ingredient, or egregious the injury to your child, you cannot sue them.
“So there no depositions, there’s no discovery, there’s no class action suit. All of a sudden vaccines became enormously profitable.
“In ’87 it was implemented and then there were a gold rush by the pharmaceutical industry to add new vaccines to the schedule.
“I got three vaccines; I was fully compliant. I’m 63 years old.
“My children got 69 doses of 16 vaccines to be compliant. And a lot of these vaccines aren’t even for casually communicable diseases, like hepatitis B which comes unprotected sex or sharing needles.
“Why do we give that to a child the first day of their life?
. Originally Posted by WTF
As a "house builder" he knows about "cutting corners"!Tell me more about borrowing Peter to pay Paul you homo LE.
He also knows about "borrowing from Peter to pay Paul"!
BTW: That was a "freudian slip" when he typed "como" ....
.... you know what he was thinking about! Originally Posted by LexusLover
This is wtf happens when you tie the hand of tort lawyers. You have bullshit like this going on. You're an idiot to think big business will protect the common man from harmful product. Originally Posted by WTFYou're also an idiot to think small business will protect the common man from harmful product.
Asking a woman up for drinks is now considered the actions of a sexual predator?Depends on the circumstances, but it also applies to you when you proposition your male employees or the employees of subcontractors that you bully.
. Originally Posted by WTF
http://www.lawyerlocator.com/mass-to...efective-drugsWow... is it cut-and-paste time for fagboy? You even went to an ambulance-chaser website named "lawyer locator" lol! Thanks for making my point!
You might be thinking to yourself, "An FDA employee did something wrong by approving Yaz or pelvic mesh or Pradaxa or another defective drug," so I should be allowed to sue the agency under the Federal Torts Claims Act." However, there are a number of exceptions written into the Act, and one of them bars lawsuits against the FDA in conjunction with its responsibilities for licensing and approving drugs and vaccines. As a result, you cannot sue the FDA for approving a defective drug. Originally Posted by WTF