If thats your premise it's shit because you only saw one of the nine pages of infractions. And I have been banned 6 or 7 damn times. And those times I was breaking the rules, ( like when I asked Edited by Pistolero Comment outside guidelines). Out of line. And those 10 points landed me a well deserved 30 day ban.
Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne
Yes, you have been banned, but you bad behavior is still tolerated otherwise after the fifth or so ban, you’d be booted or banned for significant periods of time like Sofia was and RR has been. So perhaps we should broaden the scope and ask is there any reason to keep habitual malcontents around.
BustedAmy is NOT defenseless, she's talked just as much shit as anyone else here, dare I say wu included. So are you implying that she is a hapless victim, or just too stupid to speak for herself?
Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne
Again, this is not about you or Amy. It is about whether we have a site that is governed by guidelines and if so are those guidelines moderated.
If you were pointed and banned for 30 days for this statement, why on earth would you repost it?
~
Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston
Begs the question doesn’t it.
Question asked, and answered...nothing more to see here...
Originally Posted by Wakeup
Oh did you calm down Peachez?
I did not get banned for that statement. It is merely a summary example of when I did actually break the rules and got pointed for it. And I was only banned because those 10 points put me over the 25 mark. That won't ever be the case again.
Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne
Yet it was edited out. What’s wrong with you! Why would you say something like that again if you aren’t trying to drag other women down? It’s not going to make you any better. In fact it only makes you look base.
Her talking about cyber bullying is like Lizzy Bordon telling us how well one should treat their parents.
Originally Posted by WTF
New Business! For those of you that don’t know, I have rules for my Pet so others don’t trip on his leash. Normally I let him go on a bit before I levy the rules, but this is a serious subject and I don’t think people want to listen to him obsess over me with his ridiculous analogies. The Rules are that I ignore him unless he lies, twists my words or comes up with new business. Believe it or not this typically one trick pony does come up with new business. This is one of those times. He’s never said I cyberbully people. So with that….
Pet, who have I bullied. I’m not bulling LD now. I’ve made it clear this is just the first example of blatant guideline rule breaking. Seems I was right to choose this example as a test case. The lady in question has been banned eight times. I would submit that she is the bully. Defend your allegations Pet.
So to summarize...a whore, Ol Ho, wants to curtail whore drama (which its well known she lives for)
Originally Posted by amishgangster
A, no, it’s not drama I’m known for. It’s calling board bullies on their behavior that I’m famous for. You simply interpret it as drama because you see me challenging the status quo. You’re one of those types that gets off calling women whores and watching women tear each other apart so you can still claim to be lord over your tiny little fiefdom.
And B, thread is about the guildelines and the moderation there of.
So to summarize...a whore, Ol Ho, wants to curtail whore drama (which its well known she lives for) and the first step she decides to take is to start whore drama...in order to put an end to whore drama? And to create a case of whore cyber stalking, she cyber stalks a whore?
Did I miss anything?
Originally Posted by amishgangster
You’re trying to pit women against each other and trying to claim crazy making – look it up. That is not at all what I’m doing. We are discussing guidelines and moderation of said guidelines. As I said, I chose a good example well as Daphne is a serial rule breaker as evidenced by her eight bans.
Have I missed anything?
That about sums it up.
[SIZE=3]This is not a case of OH trying to improve the civility in the community, this is a case of OH stalking LD's posts.
Originally Posted by WTF
No, hers is the first I chose. I could have chosen one of yours. I could have chosen one of Peachez. I could have chosen many of the people that post in the Hole.
[FONT=Georgia][SIZE=3][COLOR=DarkGreen]You misunderstand. Yes, I am here to make money, but think about it; a board that is highly regarded and keeps attracting respectable providers and well-heeled gentlemen will give me a larger range of clientele from which I CAN make money.
Originally Posted by Fancyinheels
Absolutely! My business was made up of the uninformed - the guys that used Eros, Clients from P411 and lurkers from here. And let me tell you, lurkers are PHENOMENAL clients. Many ladies can't or won't post to attract said lurkers if the guidelines aren’t enforced. This is like ladies night. If the ladies stop coming, the guys and their wallets stop coming.
[FONT=Georgia][SIZE=3][COLOR=DarkGreen]By the way, "whore" is not very descriptive of what some of us do.
Originally Posted by Fancyinheels
No but then what? How are men that pay whores that they hate going to justify their behavior? It has to be someone’s fault they lust after us.
I'd like to see if you feel the same way if someone went to your place of work and trash talked you, bullied you, goaded you and went out of their way to affect your income
Originally Posted by Fancyinheels
I’ve mentioned this before. It falls on deaf ears. They now what would happen.
Peachez, what can I say? You’re wrong and you’re also the one that’s paying that which you hate. Please continue showing us how logical and disengaged you are. You are clearly wrapped up in this knee deep.
New business:
I think you and Olivia have eccie confused with your place of work. It is not. Period. It is the owners place of work. Possible the Mods if what they get paid can be considered work. LOL
Originally Posted by WTF
Women market, advertise and are reviewed here. They are just independent contractors and not employees. However, if the women go away, so does the site. Just go ask the owners of the former ERAPS and ASPD when Amber’s family ran all the ladies off with the new requirements.
The rest of your diatribe is old business.