Here is a brain teaser: the Minimum Wage

Wrong it is just ass backwards you are backing a person who can't tell left from right. Wallow on Mcpig. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Keep picking at and munching on your own pubic lice, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

learn to comprehend what you read.

dipshit. Originally Posted by JCM800

There you go again with your favorite flavor as you're the one endlessly dipping your tongue in

shit, Originally Posted by JCM800

1-800-JCM-DATO: the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's soiled breechclout.

Based upon his comments on this thread that seems to be far beyond his ability. Originally Posted by Old-T

That's a rather retarded remark, Old-Twerp, considering you're the contrarian that's supporting lib-retarded policies that contribute to American unemployment.

learn to comprehend what you read IB.

think first.

are you going to take a shit in every thread today?

is this really going to start again?

Actually, OT, it is. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

The only simple part of your premise is saying it's simple. You really don't live in a real world, do ya?

But beyond that, let's suppose everyone did exactly as you suggested. Everyone. Then who would be left to work those jobs?

Wallow on Mcpig your shit is getting deeper.

In other words Tex has nothing to add. Just thought I would state the obvious for friends of Tex. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Since when has The Poster Child for not having anything meaningful to add (J D Idiot) ever concerned himself with the content of posts in The Political Forum?

learn to comprehend what you read IB.

think first.

are you going to take a shit in every thread today?

is this really going to start again? Originally Posted by JCM800

It's obvious your comprehension skills are

shit, Originally Posted by JCM800

1-800-JCM-DATO: the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's soiled breechclout, because your assertion is a bald-face lie.

Dipping your tongue in

shit, Originally Posted by JCM800

is obviously detrimental to your mental abilities, 1-800-JCM-DATO: the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's soiled breechclout.

Wallow on Mcpig your shit is getting deeper. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Tsk, tsk, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, you're mired in your own gene pool again.

It's obvious your comprehension skills are


1-800-JCM-DATO: the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's soiled breechclout, because your assertion is a bald-face lie.

Dipping your tongue in is obviously detrimental to your mental abilities, 1-800-JCM-DATO: the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's soiled breechclout.



Tsk, tsk, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, you're mired in your own gene pool again. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

My gene pool is made up of upright humans, not the knuckle draggers in yours. Keep wallowing in your shit pool Mcpig.

My gene pool is made up of upright humans, not the knuckle draggers in yours. Keep wallowing in your shit pool Mcpig. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Quibble as you may, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. it's your gene pool. But don't concern yourself so, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, because it's very shallow and rubber boots provide adequate protection.

Quibble as you may, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. it's your gene pool. But don't concern yourself so, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, because it's very shallow and rubber boots provide adequate protection. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I am glad you changed the subject because you lost the other one. You submission is noted , and you are dismissed.

You missed the point. When the federal minimum wage is raised most unions get a get a pay raise. It is in their contracts. Not all unions are same so they dont get the same amount. Some might get $1.00 and some $.50 or whatever. They get what they bargained for in their contract. That is why the price of everything from hamburgers to autos goes up when the minimum is raised. The corps dont pay WE DO.

I heard on the news that the CBO reports that raising the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour will cause 500,000 people to lose their jobs.

I am glad you changed the subject because you lost the other one. You submission is noted , and you are dismissed. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Anyone that reads this thread, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, can discern that it was one of your habitually inane, non-substantive remarks reflecting your ignorance on the OP that took this thread on a tangent. You'd lost before you started, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

I heard on the news that the CBO reports that raising the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour will cause 500,000 people to lose their jobs. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

And i'm sure every one of 'em would be willing to work for $4/hr if they had to. Right, COG? So why not drop it. Hell, even create millions of jobs that way no doubt.

Those 500,000 people will just need to do the libertarian thing and lift themselves up by their bootstraps and find another job. Their problem, not yours. They shouldn't expect to rely on someone else making $7.25/hr just so they can have a job.

Besides, those jobs aren't designed to support anyone anyways, right? So where's the harm?

Oh, i could go on and on...

And i'm sure every one of 'em would be willing to work for $4/hr if they had to. Right, COG? So why not drop it. Hell, even create millions of jobs that way no doubt.

Those 500,000 people will just need to do the libertarian thing and lift themselves up by their bootstraps and find another job. Their problem, not yours. They shouldn't expect to rely on someone else making $7.25/hr just so they can have a job.

Besides, those jobs aren't designed to support anyone anyways, right? So where's the harm?

Oh, i could go on and on... Originally Posted by Doove

What about leaving it where it is -- since the market has, for the most part, already compensated to the last change -- rather than pretending that raising it again won't push yet more people onto welfare.

That is precisely your problem. Completely focused on "the market". If the market has adjusted--whatever that truly means--but those people who are employed are poorer than they would be on welfare--then how is that success in your mind?

Sorry, the employment numbers are not the be-all and end-all of whether the economy is in good shape.

Another case of you over simplifying, and of showing that you believe the poor are truly faceless expendables. So long as they don't rock the market you're good. If they are employed but can't feed and shelter their family you can sleep well at night.

No change. Same IB.