Capitalism: A Love Story!

That's why everyone is laughing at you, sham-man. Nothing is more shammy than you. Originally Posted by lustylad

You have the gall to call someone else lame?

Usually I don't tell people off for making jokes, but you're special. A special kind of lame. You're so fucking lame that even IB, with his peurile repitition, has gotten more laughs than you.

Comedy just isn't your forte. We've already decided debating isn't either. Try something else, I'm sure you'll find one sooner or later.

You and your fucking dichotomies. Go eat a bag of dicks. Why do I give two fucks what some musician said about capitalism, that you've now regurgitated to me? Capitalism creates as many problems as it solves. Originally Posted by WombRaider

So I can put you down as one vote in favor of poverty, despotism, failure, and suffering. Okay, got you down.

The government is never going to get out of the way. The government has always BEEN in the way. How do you think the middle class of the 20th century was created? By the government, through the GI Bill and various other entities just like it. Trickle-down economics is complete bullshit.

http://billmoyers.com/2014/09/11/a-w...-trickle-down/


"Inclusive economies always outperform and outlast plutocracies. That’s why investments in the middle class work, and tax breaks for the rich don’t. The oldest and most important conflict in human societies is the battle over the concentration of wealth and power. Those at the top will forever tell those at the bottom that our respective positions are righteous and good for all. Historically we called that divine right. Today we have trickle-down economics." Originally Posted by WombRaider

If you can't even call supply side economics by it's proper name, we have to doubt that you understand the application. Supply side economics was around long before Reagan and the socialist left.

As for the unsubstantiated quote: Warren Buffet

I'm not the one that said it did. Wombraider started this by complaining about the disparity. I have argued against comparing the two from the beginning. You said I was confusing the two. He is the one that said a CEO should not be able to make more in one month than the companies lowest paid employee makes in a year, Get it now. You're acting like a bitch to the wrong person. Go tell your butt buddy, Wombraider. Originally Posted by Budman

Not the way I saw it. You took the argument from a philosophical one to a material one by saying this:

So why is it a problem if the ceo makes 300 percent more than a minimum wage employee? You didn't answer the question. How much should a ceo be paid? Originally Posted by Budman

Like I said: there is no connection.



I even gave you a link to a reputable source which explains the theoretical and social disadvantages of corporate CEO culture.

http://www.epi.org/publication/ib331...top-1-percent/

Did you take a minute to read up and educate yourself? of course not

So I can put you down as one vote in favor of poverty, despotism, failure, and suffering. Okay, got you down. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Why are you the one keeping tally of votes in this sick fantasy of yours?

If you can't even call supply side economics by it's proper name, we have to doubt that you understand the application. Supply side economics was around long before Reagan and the socialist left.

As for the unsubstantiated quote: Warren Buffet Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I understand it doesn't work.

You've proven my point (though I doubt that you will understand that)

You have the gall to call someone else lame?

Usually I don't tell people off for making jokes, but you're special. A special kind of lame. You're so fucking lame that even IB, with his peurile repitition, has gotten more laughs than you.

Comedy just isn't your forte. We've already decided debating isn't either. Try something else, I'm sure you'll find one sooner or later. Originally Posted by shanm

You're so fucking stupid, shamman, it's necessary to repeat each and every lesson for you to learn the facts, e.g., based on previous experience in the Pacific War, using the atomic bombs saved American and probably Japanese lives.

You're so fucking stupid, shamman, it's necessary to repeat each and every lesson for you to learn the facts, e.g., based on previous experience in the Pacific War, using the atomic bombs saved American and probably Japanese lives. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're so fucking lame that even IB, with his peurile repitition, has gotten more laughs than you. Originally Posted by shanm

See that Lusty? That's how you do it....

You're so fucking stupid, shamman, it's necessary to repeat each and every lesson for you to learn the facts, e.g., based on previous experience in the Pacific War, using the atomic bombs saved American and probably Japanese lives. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The pacific war? Is that the official title? Because I always though it was World War 2 and the Pacific Theater. You gruberized sodomite.

See that Lusty? That's how you do it.... Originally Posted by shanm

You're shamming again, shamman.

The pacific war? Is that the official title? Because I always though it was World War 2 and the Pacific Theater. You gruberized sodomite. Originally Posted by WombRaider

What you think you know and what you actually know are often tangential commodities, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

"Pacific Theater of World War II" redirects here....
The Pacific War, sometimes called the Asia-Pacific War, was the theatre of World War II which was fought in the Pacific and East Asia. It was fought over a vast area which included the Pacific Ocean and islands, the South West Pacific, South-East Asia, and in China (including the 1945 Soviet–Japanese conflict). (wiki)

Comedy just isn't your forte. Originally Posted by shanm

The only time you and undercunt generate more laughs than I do is when you two phony dicklicking trolls stutter and stammer and pretend you understand concepts like the Phillips Curve or Pascal's Wager.

I gotta admit I can't compete with that level of humor! You fuckers really know how to put everyone in stitches!

The only time you and undercunt generate more laughs than I do is when you two phony dicklicking trolls stutter and stammer and pretend you understand concepts like the Phillips Curve or Pascal's Wager.

I gotta admit I can't compete with that level of humor! You fuckers really know how to put everyone in stitches!


Originally Posted by lustylad

Right. says the "economist" who doesn't know what QE is.

Btw, have you finished the wikipedia article yet?

The only time you and undercunt generate more laughs than I do is when you two phony dicklicking trolls stutter and stammer and pretend you understand concepts like the Phillips Curve or Pascal's Wager.

I gotta admit I can't compete with that level of humor! You fuckers really know how to put everyone in stitches!


Originally Posted by lustylad

It's not hard to generate more laughs than you. One, would do the trick. Give it up shitsipper, you're in over your head. You're becoming completely unhinged.

Right. says the "economist" who doesn't know what QE is.

Btw, have you finished the wikipedia article yet? Originally Posted by shanm

The best part about that whole thing was that he thought that since Friedman was dead, somehow his ideas died with him and weren't able to be used anymore. He knows what wikipedia tells him. If you copy and paste some of his longer spiels, the first hit is the wikipedia article on the subject. Lame.