CVS goes woke

You sure about that?
History and science says otherwise. Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

Yeah, I’m sure about it.

What's the actual excuse. Please. All you have been doing is making excuses

Now you are trying to throw a caveat in about just a single stall, one occupant locked bathroom. You know that is not the issue. It is about shared bathrooms and shared locker rooms.

And yes, anyone who thinks they are a different gender than what they really are, are on some level mentally disturbed. Originally Posted by berryberry

It's not a caveat.

The lack of motion censors in there and improper close-out procedures allowed a man to hide out in one of those restrooms overnight.

You have an illusion of safety. Dreamgirl understands the farcical nature of that illusion because she sees the plethora of things that are even worse. That you and I don't instantly, habitually and instinctively perceive.

You also have an illusion of threats. There are reasonable systems in place to reduce threats. But, as we know, a bad actor can find a way. You're pre-judging that they're bad actors... because they're trans.

And those shared locker rooms, in most cases, are break rooms that aren't changing areas at the retail level.

At the warehouse level... it depends.

At the Corporate level, I think we'll agree it's vastly different.

I Saying the human race has been force fed heterosexuality for centuries is the most ludicrous thing I’ve ever heard Originally Posted by bambino

but but you’ve been CONDITIONED, you misogynist pig! At least she’s not blaming it on antidisestablishmentarianism.

Women being assaulted by CIS Men is a current event. It’s just one you choose not to focus on.

I’m still waiting for the data about women being assaulted by trannies anywhere and in CVS or elsewhere. Let’s see the stats! Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

Again, you are welcome to start any thread you like about those assaults. No one is stopping you

And there is no such thing as CIS men. There are MEN and there are WOMEN. Biology 101.

If I were an employee at a CVS, I’d much rather be in a state of undress with a guy that thinks he’s a woman than with a cis man. Every single time. Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

Cool - but you didn't answer the question. I didn't ask about you. I asked about whether most women would be comfortable with being watched in a state of undress in a locker room by any guy (let alone guys who think they are women)

but but you’ve been CONDITIONED, you misogynist pig! At least she’s not blaming it on antidisestablishmentarianism. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

I’ve been CONDITIONED by God at birth. Like everyone else has. Where you go from there is on you.

Cool - but you didn't answer the question. I didn't ask about you. I asked about whether most women would be comfortable with being watched in a state of undress in a locker room by any guy (let alone guys who think they are women) Originally Posted by berryberry

I’m in a position to speak for Most Women much more than you, sir. But fair enough, How about I’ll put a poll on my Twitter account and see what the results are?

It's not a caveat. Originally Posted by HDGristle

But it is, no matter how much you protest otherwise

You're pre-judging that they're bad actors... because they're trans.
Originally Posted by HDGristle

NO - I am not pre-judging them because they are trans. I am against ANY male sharing the same bathroom or locker room with women at the same time.

I’ve been CONDITIONED by God at birth. Like everyone else has. Where you go from there is on you. Originally Posted by bambino

You’re pretty close here… if only you could connect the dots.

But it is, no matter how much you protest otherwise



NO - I am not pre-judging them because they are trans. I am against ANY male sharing the same bathroom or locker room with women at the same time. Originally Posted by berryberry

But why is that?? Is it because women are unsafe around men in enclosed quarters?

The outrage you’re expressing, is called projection.

I’m in a position to speak for Most Women much more than you, sir. But fair enough, How about I’ll put a poll on my Twitter account and see what the results are? Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

Well, I suspect you have a skewed audience on your Twitter account, but feel free to do so.

I just happen to have done my own poll on the issue (albeit a few years ago before I retired) at my last job and not one woman was in favor of allowing shared restroom and locker room facilities. The only one who was was my idiot of a boss, a far left liberal male. Thankfully everyone else had common sense to shut his idea down

But why is that?? Is it because women are unsafe around men in enclosed quarters? Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

Because some men are idiots.

And no, not necessarily in all enclosed quarters as you can't eliminate every risk that exists. But in some cases, which present a higher risk like those where people are in various stages of undress. Both from a privacy aspect as well as a safety aspect.

But it is, no matter how much you protest otherwise



NO - I am not pre-judging them because they are trans. I am against ANY male sharing the same bathroom or locker room with women at the same time. Originally Posted by berryberry

Then why so much emphasis on deranged? This is an out. Take it. Please.

Love your scientific pole poll, btw. How many respondents?

Well, I suspect you have a skewed audience on your Twitter account, but feel free to do so.

I just happen to have done my own poll on the issue (albeit a few years ago before I retired) at my last job and not one woman was in favor of allowing shared restroom and locker room facilities Originally Posted by berryberry

Well, funny thing about Twitter is that it can be broadcast to everyone and retweeted by everyone, it’s not just my followers.

You’re pretty close here… if only you could connect the dots. Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

I’ve connected the dots before you were born.