Kim Jong-un Says He Will Sink A US Carrier.......

You equate speed limits with fissionable material? Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I was dumbing it down for you, but I can see it didn't work!

Just go hookup with WTF and suck down a beer!

No, I don't think that's it.
He knows he'll get more than he gave.
That's the one thing he knows for sure.

I think he's pissed he wasted his life. He's too lazy and education resistant to have his own business so he's bitter he he has to work for someone he feels better than.
It's his burden.
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Bingo....now he'll claim we outed him.



.

Trying to rack up those posts?
I asked you questions about logic and you respond with the same "statement" that showed you didn't have a refute or an answer.

Again.

Needs repeating! Originally Posted by LexusLover

.... since the Russians don't have an export licence the uranium isn't going anywhere. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Here, does this help you with your cognitive skills...



"... since my son doesn't don't have a DRIVER'S licenSe* the FAMILY CAR isn't going anywhere"

* correctly spelled.

You ever being a "parent" in your whole life...?

Your comparative skills don't exist.

Documentation to use a motor vehicle compared to documentation to export radioactive material. You see them as equal. You see the objectives as equal.

The first is issued to most 16 to 18 yo kids after minimal training to operate a vehicle with no special regulations or dangers to the operator or bystanders.

The second is issued to export material that can make a nuclear weapon with inherent danger to the general public if not handled and stored properly.

So instead of comparing apples and apples or even apples and oranges, you compare cars and nuclear weapons.
You truly are the #1 moron.

But you're not done yet. On top of this all, you use big capital font logic to proclaim the Russians will remove this material from the US no matter what the US authorities do to stop them. We are helpless to stop them.I didn't vote for trump but I'll bet he can keep that uranium in the the US.

Especially when the Russians are going to sell it to us.

No need to insult you. How can I top what you're doing to yourself. This is one of those total collapses we see right before you violate your restraining order and go on school grounds with a rifle.

Here, does this help you with your cognitive skills...



"... since my son doesn't don't have a DRIVER'S licenSe* the FAMILY CAR isn't going anywhere"

* correctly spelled. Originally Posted by LexusLover

You ever being a "parent" in your whole life...? Originally Posted by andymarksman

you ever been the parent of a Nazi youth?

bahahhaaha

btw the Nazi youth called .. they want their avatar back .. and your spawn

they intend to euthanize them for the future of humanity

I was dumbing it down for you, but I can see it didn't work!

Just go hookup with WTF and suck down a beer! Originally Posted by LexusLover

No you weren't. Because on your next attempt, you used an example that again was based on the opposite end of the spectrum of import and degree of relevance to the subject matter.
And in both examples your stupid conclusion was based on us not being able to stop the Russians from removing it from the US.

Here, does this help you with your cognitive skills...



"... since my son doesn't don't have a DRIVER'S licenSe* the FAMILY CAR isn't going anywhere"

* correctly spelled. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Glad to see you made this example even easier to see it has nothing to do with handling or exporting uranium.

Don't worry. Mommy will still pretend to love you.
I see I finally shamed you into changing your big angry font color.

You ever being a "parent" in your whole life...? Originally Posted by andymarksman

I feel like one on here, Junior!

Unless you were addressing your question to Munchie!

He thinks rules and regulations keep ALL people from doing shit the rules and regulations tell them they can't do ...

...like exceed 65 mph on the Toll Road!!!

And he claims to be a "world traveler"!! Go figure!!

[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105946675 3]No you weren't. Because on your next attempt, you used an example that again was based on the opposite end of the spectrum of import and degree of relevance to the subject matter.[QUOTE]

Apparently I got pretty close to your "Dumb Level" ... you understood ...

... immature folks like you ignore comparisons when you don't want to understand though!

It's apparent you are the one embarrassed based on your stupid conclusion ...

.. the presence of "licensing" and "regulations" keeps people from violating the laws!!!!


And you claim to be a "world traveler"!!!!

I feel like one on here, Junior!

Unless you were addressing your question to Munchie!

He thinks rules and regulations keep ALL people from doing shit the rules and regulations tell them they can't do ...

...like exceed 65 mph on the Toll Road!!!

And he claims to be a "world traveler"!! Go figure!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

" ...claims to be a world traveler. " He needs to understand that just because he likes it when others go " around the world " ON HIM, that doesn't make HIM a " world traveler " !

" ...claims to be a world traveler. " He needs to understand that just because he likes it when others go " around the world " ON HIM, that doesn't make HIM a " world traveler " ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

He's too much of a loudmouth to get too far "out of town"!

Oh, ... that "around the world" ... his momma probably didn't teach him about talking with this mouth full.

I feel like one on here, Junior!

Unless you were addressing your question to Munchie!

He thinks rules and regulations keep ALL people from doing shit the rules and regulations tell them they can't do ...

...like exceed 65 mph on the Toll Road!!!

And he claims to be a "world traveler"!! Go figure!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

You keep coming back to stand in the "stupid spotlight".
1. Don't tell me what I think, douche-bag. You can't read and comprehend text let alone somebody's mind. Your limitations don't limit me.
This is one of the subjects you squeal like a little kid about.

2. You keep ignoring a central point. Because I haven't mentioned it, you haven't thought of it. And it's painfully obvious you don't go beyond what you "know". This is also the reason your examples are those made by someone who is under-educated.
Enforcement/prevention. The amount of money spent per possible occurrence for your speeding example and uranium is huge. No physical means are employed to prevent you from speeding. Many are used to make sure you don't smuggle uranium.
Because I hadn't put the idea in your head that your examples are pretty much words on paper while uranium regulations involve many types of safeguards to keep assholes like you honest (fat chance of keeping the lexusliar honest).
Bottom line is that just because your under-educated self says something is possible doesn't mean it is. Your lack of knowledge about the security industry is huge and what insider info you have is how to reset the door alarm at the 7-11 you work at. As usual you have no facts to back you up.

[QUOTE=LexusLover;1059467958]

No you weren't. Because on your next attempt, you used an example that again was based on the opposite end of the spectrum of import and degree of relevance to the subject matter.[QUOTE]

Apparently I got pretty close to your "Dumb Level" ... you understood ...

... immature folks like you ignore comparisons when you don't want to understand though!I ignore comparisons made by people who don't know enough about the subject matter to make valid comparisons.
You're not my kid and I have no obligation to teach or tolerate your stupid ass while you make your 31000th attempt at pulling your head out of your ass. You're just another internet punk it's fun to verbally slap the shit out of. You barely qualify as the coarsest of the 3 stones I use to put an edge on my knife.
And embarrassed by my conclusions? Why would I be?
My conclusion you know nothing about compairing like items that are close enough in scope to be valid subjects? Spot on.
That the Russians aren't going to try to smuggle many tons of uranium out of the US? Because they don't have to? Because we already buy it from them? Another final answer I'm happy with (only a douche-bag like you would try to smuggle when you didn't have to just so you could back up a stupid position you grabbed.....because you're stupid).

And finally, my conclusion that you only see the paper rules and can't connect the dots there is so much more to protecting the US.
That's why you keep using stupid comparisons. You really don't see a difference.

It's apparent you are the one embarrassed based on your stupid conclusion ...

.. the presence of "licensing" and "regulations" keeps people from violating the laws!!!!


And you claim to be a "world traveler"!!!! Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Yes.
I spend a lot of time in airports. Because I'm a world traveler.
You on the other hand are not a world traveler. You spend a lot of time talking shit on a hooker board,
A shitload of time.


And reading the envy in your text is one of the sweetest sights I've seen.
Hang in there douche-bag. Maybe you'll make it back to Mexico without having to be in the burro show

Of course not all military men are saints. I actually think you did serve in the military but that doesn't mean you are not a fat fucking POS. You lie about just about everything and wonder why others think so poorly of you. Bowe Bergdahl served as well but he is still a fucking POS that should be hung. You continually act the fool and then seem butt hurt when others call you names. Grow the fuck up. Many here get under your skin and it is so easy to put you on the defensive. You are a fucking fat, clueless POS that does suck dick. You once claimed that you had seen some of the same providers I had. That is very unlikely. I haven't done a review since 12-20-2011. You didn't join until 2015. Chances of you ever seeing the same provider as me are slim and none. Go back to sucking dick and leave the political discussions to real men. Originally Posted by Budman

Hey don't be sexist here, there are women who also enjoy good political discourse as well, even though we do realize it is a playground for seasoned gents to show off their testosterone or lack thereof.

....we do realize it is a playground for seasoned gents to show off their testosterone or lack thereof. Originally Posted by Cherie

Who's "we"?

You men there are "gents" in here?