Why is everybody antagonizing the providers only, and predicting/assuming that if it doesn't work out it's because she's going to do him wrong ?
What if is the other way around, and he ends up doing her wrong?
If she is a good and stable provider she also has a lot to lose and risk if she decides to stop providing to pursue a relationship.
I for one, will never leave the industry for a man, I will do it when my goals and plans have become a reality or for my own personal reasons but for a man? Nah.
You can't turn a trick into a husband either...
Originally Posted by Natalia Mori
this is a fair analysis...I do think its just one of the societal double standards. I don't know why we pursue monogomy in the first place maybe its just based on tradition for men and security for women or just trust and having someone there for you in the end.
I agree never leave for a man don't care how much he's worth. He's either gonna make you work for the benefits of his wealth, dump you later for a hotter chic, and throughout the relationship will never stop letting you know that its his money.This is an analysis from a couple of my RW Caucasian friends who used to spend most of their time on Millionaire match maker type websites looking for the one and occasionally finding one only for it to go south time and again
So.....
a good thing providers can do is set their price point, earn their money and in parallel focus on obtaining a recession proof skill that gives them the flexibility they desire to leave or take a break from the business as they wish....because the value of the dollar will likely only get worse over time.... so having that non provider skill to fall back on or even use as your primary source of income can prove invaluable.
i do agree with your overall analysis