A question and a challenge.

The lazylady thought I answered for everyone left of center. For some reason he heard something in his mind tell him that what he read was that I "don't indulge in the same perverted, predatory and illegal activities that your "NAMBLA defending" ideological brethren do."

Where the hell he came up with that is up to him to answer. The soup analogy is that what he interpreted is not what I wrote. Just to lazy to think about what I wrote. Just jumps to far FAR fetched conclusions.

Hence: lazylady.

Remember that when some says "so you're saying . . . blah blah blah", they didn't listen to what you said. Just heard what they wanted. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Like the left does when they want to pin everyone as racists and misogynists when they dont agree with them?

For the record, you are the one taking this thread off topic because you don't understand something that should have been self explanatory. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Still being coy, 9500? I asked you to explain something you posted. You said re-read it. I did. You blew up and said I mis-read it. I said let's start over again. I asked you to explain it a second time. You said it's self-explanatory. How long do you want to keep playing stupid games like this?

Here's what you wrote:

I'm far left but not a tree huggin', NAMBLA defendin', ban all firearms, kumbaya singin' peacenik. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Your plain English tells us the following:

1. Your politics are on the far left.
2. Many people on the far left defend NAMBLA.
3. However, you are not one of them.

No problem so far? Just reading the plain English of what you wrote. Now let's take it all logically a step further, shall we?

1. Most far left people are dim-retards.
2. They shape the official platform of the dim-retard party.
3. It's reasonable to expect they will attempt to communicate their views (that NAMBLA is a respectable group of citizens who advocate a defensible life style) into the official 2020 dim-retard party platform.

Still with me, 9500? Good! No far-fetched conclusion there. Just elaborating on the logical implications of your post.

So - thank you for alerting everyone to what the far left is up to these days! Most of us already knew they were in favor of socialism, open borders, and post-birth abortions. But we had no idea they've also taken up the cause of coddling and defending (forbidden topic)!

(Of course, we're talking about your buddies on the far left and not you personally, 9500.)

I can't wait to see what further surprises lie in store for us when the dim-retards hold their Convention next summer!

Lusty his post says hes (sic) clearly NOT a tree hugger, and whatever the fuck the MAMBLA (sic) is. What aren't you getting? Originally Posted by themystic

If you're smart you'll stay out of this, mystic!

If you're smart you'll stay out of this, mystic! Originally Posted by lustylad

if you're smart.......

I know that phrase is a modal adjunct used as a filler and not meant as literal doubt

for you already know the level of his intelligence

If you're smart you'll stay out of this, mystic! Originally Posted by lustylad

LL is waving a Red Cape in front of - not a bull, but a blind mole rat equivalent.

LL is waving a Red Cape in front of - not a bull, but a blind mole rat equivalent. Originally Posted by oeb11

And you’re waving your frilly panties in front of a bunch of cyber bots.

Maybe you ought to be a little more concerned about your own digital health.

And I’m qualified to say that.

Still being coy, 9500? I asked you to explain something you posted. You said re-read it. I did. You blew up and said I mis-read it. I said let's start over again. I asked you to explain it a second time. You said it's self-explanatory.

GOD Damn the lazy lady is stupid.

How long do you want to keep playing stupid games like this?

The lazy lady need to stop being the only retard in the class who doesn't understand. She needs to give it up. I can't fix stupid.

Here's what you wrote:

No! That's what she read. Does she understand how basic English works?

Your plain English tells us the following:

1. Your politics are on the far left.
2. Many people on the far left defend NAMBLA.

Did I write that? Or is that what the lazy lady heard me "tell" her? She needs to stop being so fuckin' stupid because I'm not being coy. Is this English plain enough for her? No poetry. Just serious prose.

3. However, you are not one of them.

No problem so far? Just reading the plain English of what you wrote. Now let's take it all logically a step further, shall we?

This is called jumping to a far fetched conclusion. She is such a dense CUNT. I can't believe she thinks this isn't the case. Actually I can, she must be a retard. She just wants to think that.

1. Most far left people are dim-retards.
2. They shape the official platform of the dim-retard party.
3. It's reasonable to expect they will attempt to communicate their views (that NAMBLA is a respectable group of citizens who advocate a defensible life style) into the official 2020 dim-retard party platform.

Where the hell does she get this shit? I only told the waiter I didn't care for the soup and now a toddler is dead. How stupid can she contunue to be? Sorry to use a metaphor. If plain prose doesn't work, Gump's momma had a way of explaining things to Forrest so he could understand. The lazy lady is Forrest in this scenario. In case she's not with me.

Still with me, 9500? Good!

How can you answer for me? She just continues to show how lazy and stupid the lady is.

No far-fetched conclusion there.

Yes! It is. The lazy lady keeps being stupid. It's not my fault she doesn't understand. She didn't undersrand what EVERYbody else didn't question.

Just elaborating on the logical implications of your post.

Correction: Illogical. Extrapolation.

So - thank you for alerting everyone to what the far left is up to these days! Most of us already knew they were in favor of socialism, open borders, and post-birth abortions. But we had no idea they've also taken up the cause of coddling and defending (forbidden topic)!

The lazy lady takes being stupid to a whole new low. The lazy lady needs to see a doctor- a head doctor to talk about these imaginary and sick summaries. I didn't think it was that bad. Is this representative of the madness on the far right?

(Of course, we're talking about your buddies on the far left and not you personally, 9500.)

I can't wait to see what further surprises lie in store for us when the dim-retards hold their Convention next summer! Originally Posted by lustylad

If the bitch has a problem with what I wrote, she can take it up with a moderator. Or start a new thread.

To be clear, this was an exercise in futility. She will continue to hear whay she wants. "So you're saying . . . blah ditty fuckin' blah" means you didn't hear what I said or didn't understand what I wrote.

You know, 9500, lustylad burst into the Political Forum scene a few years ago and made his name by trying to out-petty IBH.

We coulda sworn it was IBH’s bastard son (until we realized how biologically absurd that would be)

But I think you’re”ladyfriend” still might answer to Junior.

You know, 9500, lustylad burst into the Political Forum scene a few years ago and made his name by trying to out-petty IBH.

We coulda sworn it was IBH’s bastard son (until we realized how biologically absurd that would be)

But I think you’re”ladyfriend” still might answer to Junior. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

And we all now how you made your name!


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You know, 9500, lustylad burst into the Political Forum scene a few years ago and made his name by trying to out-petty IBH.

We coulda sworn it was IBH’s bastard son (until we realized how biologically absurd that would be)

But I think you’re”ladyfriend” still might answer to Junior. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Thank you sir.

These assertions and conclusions about who I am and what I represent are not only stupid, but just outright unfounded. That's why I post the signature GIFs or pics.

I know what I know and am who I am and that is as far as I go. I hope to represent an idea. Not so much a physical manifestation of some concrete entity.

Sometimes what I post is shear sillyness. Other times serious personal philosophy.

As I'm sure you read before on here, The Waco Kid wanted to join us two in the same idea. I posted we are on here to answer for ourselves. If I agree with you and/or anyone else, I'll give a hearty "here here!"

I'd hate to here how I've made a name for myself on here and what some might think I've become or am on this board.

Having said that, I know I'm about to hear it. Oh well, It'll be easier now to be calm.

Thank you sir.

These assertions and conclusions about who I am and what I represent are not only stupid, but just outright unfounded. That's why I post the signature GIFs or pics.

I know what I know and am who I am and that is as far as I go. I hope to represent an idea. Not so much a physical manifestation of some concrete entity.

Sometimes what I post is shear sillyness. Other times serious personal philosophy.

As I'm sure you read before on here, The Waco Kid wanted to join us two in the same idea. I posted we are on here to answer for ourselves. If I agree with you and/or anyone else, I'll give a hearty "here here!"

I'd hate to here how I've made a name for myself on here and what some might think I've become or am on this board.

Having said that, I know I'm about to hear it. Oh well, It'll be easier now to be calm.

















Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Where did you “here” that?

“to here how“

That was almost funny. I had the "here here" in mind. I was writing too fast. It happens.

My interpretation of this is - you are not a member of the far,far left - those that embrace NAMBLA,tree hugging and kumbaya stuff.. Is that the difference between far left and far,far left? Dude, I didn't even know the far,far left embraced this. It sounds that way in which you wrote it. And if that is the case, they truly have mental illness.

I gave this thread some serious thought. As I was writing my opinions, and that's all they are, ideas and points came to mind and, as I proof read (past tense), the final piece looked and felt dicombobulated to me.




Agreed. As I undersrand, and dare I say interpret, the Constitution does not mean the militia has to be organized. No more than evey farmer or homeowner has to be organized. Just too many citizens to care for.

Whether using your home or farm to manufacture contra ban or not, it is up to each citizens to responsibly use their property. Organized or not. But ownership should be public information order to find those responsible if the law is broken or public health is at risk.

Before I "get off on" a rant, owners of all firearms should be tracked. If you consider yourself a responsible owner. Like a Meth-house owner or "independent" Marijuana farmer, everyone's privacy is crucial to the equation.

Beleive it or not, I'm not a conscientious objector. I'm far left but not a tree huggin', NAMBLA defendin', ban all firearms, kumbaya singin' peacenik. I served. I see the value of, and enthusiasm for, defense weapons. I'm reminded of Forrest Gump assembling the rifle in company record time. (Okay okay I'll close)

The idea for the thread was a good one, but with almost 250 years of interpretation and redefining of the law, it was flawed from the word go. As the end of the Enlightenment Era came to a close, the shot heard 'round the world would start the march toward liberty. Now . . . let's talk slavery and the Native experience.

Thank God for public schools, PBS, and C-SPAN.















Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

My interpretation of this is - you are not a member of the far,far left - those that embrace NAMBLA,tree hugging and kumbaya stuff.. Is that the difference between far left and far,far left? Dude, I didn't even know the far,far left embraced this. It sounds that way in which you wrote it. And if that is the case, they truly have mental illness. Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Another one. It's not how it sounds, that's how you heard it. More of that logic at work?

Ok this is what I see. Those are far right extremists.
So - you are saying that they ( the ones that embrace all that stuff you mentioned) are far left extremists?
For the record, I'm honestly trying to figure how what you are saying vs what I am hearing. So could you just say what you actually mean? I'm a senior citizen so I need it broken down for me.

Another one. It's not how it sounds, that's how you heard it. More of that logic at work?

Is this an example of the right? Far right? Far far right?

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500