In any objective circle this is called consensual sex. There was no pressure on her. No coercion. [/QUOTE]As usual you think a complicated subject can be covered in a sound bite.
#1: When one party is a superior it is legally considered non-consensual, with pressure, and with coercion. In business, the government, and the military. It is sexual harassment, and has been since Clarence Thomas took overp? Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
Right back at you:
As usual you think a complicated subject can be covered in a sound bite.
Well bite this. Originally Posted by LexusLover
It's bizarre how the libs will defend Clinton in this. In any objective circle, he was a predator preying on young, impressionable woman. In any company, this would be punished. The woman would have a lawsuit and make millions. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuyThe amazing thing, is the way NOW defended Clinton. As long as he protected a woman's "right" to have a partial birth abortion, nothing else mattered to them. Juanita Broaddrick could have had rock solid proof of her rape allegation; they wouldn't have cared.
The amazing thing, is the way NOW defended Clinton. As long as he protected a woman's "right" to have a partial birth abortion, nothing else mattered to them. Juanita Broaddrick could have had rock solid proof of her rape allegation; they wouldn't have cared. Originally Posted by joe bloeThe same crap from the liberals is happening right now. Re-define, re-characterize, re-write, re-vise, and re-negotiate ... anything to get the "community organzier" re-elected.
The same crap from the liberals is happening right now. Re-define, re-characterize, re-write, re-vise, and re-negotiate ... anything to get the "community organzier" re-elected.Obama is the most radical president in American history. If Obama is in office, and we have a complete economic collapse, there is no way this country will stay free.
And now they are "re-treading" ... while they re-invent! Originally Posted by LexusLover
I find it ironic: on THIS site we have so many people who find consentual sex to be evil--but only when it involved someone they loath already. Originally Posted by Old-TYou need to get a grip .... there are a number of areas of the law in which "consensual" sex is criminalized, punished, and prohibited ... the general areas are age and relationship related ... one topic is taboo on this board ... you know that one!
You need to get a grip .... there are a number of areas of the law in which "consensual" sex is criminalized, punished, and prohibited ... the general areas are age and relationship related ... one topic is taboo on this board ... you know that one!+1
the other has to do with persons who are in positions of "authority" e.g. cops, teachers, employers-supervisors ...
what IS hypocritical about this topic IS ...
that "cops, teachers, and employers-supervisors" get punished and charged, but ..
... Bill Clinton DID NOT!
Burlington Indus. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998), et seq, outlines the basis for companies being held "presumptively" liable for discrimination based on sex when supervisors in the company engage in "consensual" sexual activity with subordinates. ....
you can slice it any way you want to and raise all the insults you can dream up, but when the boss starts hitting on the hot babes in the business the boss and his company are "going down" ... and I don't mean oral sex! Originally Posted by LexusLover
I find it ironic: on THIS site we have so many people who find consentual sex to be evil--but only when it involved someone they loath already.So true!!!
Hypoctits.
Hypoctits.
Hypoctits.
Other issues, fire away at Clinton. Fair game. But anyone juming on this who has a review on here--or had had some sessions without reviewing them, is a two-faced hypocrit. Originally Posted by Old-T
Obama is the most radical president in American history. If Obama is in office, and we have a complete economic collapse, there is no way this country will stay free.Big talk from a dude who won't put his money where his mouth is. Willing to accept hide behind the skirts of freedom that others have died for but not willing to lift a finger to fix any of the nation's ills. American's have a name for that: COWARD!
Obama understands, that if the country is in chaos, bordering on civil war, he will be able to implement a police state with the people's permission. Most people will trade their freedom for the promise of security in that scenario. Originally Posted by joe bloe
I find it ironic: on THIS site we have so many people who find consentual sex to be evil--but only when it involved someone they loath already.
Hypoctits.
Hypoctits.
Hypoctits.
Other issues, fire away at Clinton. Fair game. But anyone juming on this who has a review on here--or had had some sessions without reviewing them, is a two-faced hypocrit. Originally Posted by Old-T
I find it ironic: on THIS site we have so many people who find consentual sex to be evil--but only when it involved someone they loath already.
Hypoctits.
Hypoctits.
Hypoctits.
Other issues, fire away at Clinton. Fair game. But anyone juming on this who has a review on here--or had had some sessions without reviewing them, is a two-faced hypocrit. Originally Posted by Old-T
So true!!! Originally Posted by ElisabethWhispersYou two are soooo Kool Aid dumb and blind, and you two are the hypocrites. Perjury is a crime and subject to prosecution under the law, when caught. P4P is a crime subject to prosecution under the law, if caught. Can either one of you Dim-witted yahoos deny those facts?