Zero Tolerance policy against outting

Sistine Chapel's Avatar
I'm over dosing on popcawn and Pepsi



While getting in a good

Y'all carry on.
You posted my name here out unsustainable accusations
Originally Posted by Natalia Mori
Tsk Tsk you see how that works?
How often do you post up accusations without substantiation?
hahahahahahaha NO ONE MORE DESERVING!
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 03-17-2017, 10:45 AM


...for you to keep on lying your ass off, cause you know damn well that's not how you came up with your "calculations"




Originally Posted by Natalia Mori
The real problem is not how old your children are, the real problem is that YOU chose to post about having kids on a whore board thus letting the world know your personal business.

Any ladies reading this thread...please note this is not a smart thing to do, it opens uou up to all kinds of speculation. The hooby world does not need to know a thing about your children. LE reads these boards, they do not need to know.

Natalia is missing the big picture and trying to divert blame to others. It is her fault alone that her kids are even mentioned on a hooker board. Do not make that same mistake.
TryWeakly's Avatar
Hooby? Lids?

Sounds like you are getting all emotional up in this bitch and can't keep your (usual) error-free spelling in order.

So what's this about Kyana? Inquiring minds want to know...
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 03-17-2017, 11:18 AM
Hooby? Lids?

Sounds like you are getting all emotional up in this bitch and can't keep your (usual) error-free spelling in order.

.. Originally Posted by TryWeakly
Emotional? Me?

You do realize the topic is not my horrible spelling ... or are you and LL the same person and just divert when the truth does not fit your narrative?



Do you think it was a smart move for Natalia or any provider for that matter to bring up the fact that she has kids on a hooker board? Is that GS fault?


.
TryWeakly's Avatar
Quit deflecting.
SweetDulce's Avatar



Do you think it was a smart move for Natalia or any provider for that matter to bring up the fact that she has kids on a hooker board?


. Originally Posted by WTF
A hooker that has kids!!!

What! Are you serious?

Next NaMo "might accidentally" leak out that she speaks Spanish.

I would have never guessed
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 03-17-2017, 01:29 PM
A hooker that has kids!!!

What! Are you serious?

Next NaMo "might accidentally" leak out that she speaks Spanish.

I would have never guessed Originally Posted by SweetDulce
She shouldn't be then concerned with folks speculating on her kids if she brings them up.

You do know that CPS may frown on that. Do you then understand how silly it is for a young hooker to be talking about her kids on a hooker board.

We all have family, should we bring them up on a hooker board?

You are deflecting for her and TriWeekly ( which is just her in disguise )in effect congratulating ignorant behavior.

So yes , you are correct that providers have kids, you are incorrect if you think it a good idea to confirm that on a hooker board.
TryWeakly's Avatar
She shouldn't be then concerned with folks speculating on her kids if she brings them up.

You do know that CPS may frown on that. Do you then understand how silly it is for a young hooker to be talking about her kids on a hooker board.

We all have family, should we bring them up on a hooker board?

You are deflecting for her and TriWeekly ( which is just her in disguise )in effect congratulating ignorant behavior.

So yes , you are correct that providers have kids, you are incorrect if you think it a good idea to confirm that on a hooker board. Originally Posted by WTF
Are you implying that you are going to "out" her to CPS?

I am definitely not NM in disguise. That is tarded. No offense to her, but I was here first.

Deflection and redirection does seem to fit your MO to make such an implication, though

You think that what you are doing (verbal regurgitation of previously stated information) is a good idea? Who gives a fuck how many kids anyone has? Oh yeah, you do. You are obviously still butthurt from your previous BAN and now coming back again to stir up the kool-aid, again.....
.



What was your other handle again?
Don't see any implying going on?
How do you know CPS doesn't monitor this site looking for irresponsible mothers?
If she gets busted by LE, you think her getting deported might not bring them into play?
The obvious is being stated.
I for one will laugh my fucking ass off if it happens!
TryWeakly's Avatar
Why was it your RockerRick handle was banned again?
Seems to me you have an agenda, given the fact that one of your first missions was to hop on this thread and post up more stupid accusatory shit. What was it she did to you, ricky?

Butthurt to say the least. Was it consensual? Not enough lube? What was it? PIUITB, or start a different thread. Those only cost 5 points!
Accumulated points.
Not accusatory, factual shit she has done, she ran her mouth accusing me of shit for over 6 months while I had no voice to defend or fight with, plenty of post that prove it.
Back in your hole there fake handle troll.
TryWeakly's Avatar
Fake handle troll is not accusatory? It definitely is not factual what you are implying. Why would you imply that?

Accumulated points gets you two year vacation?
TryWeakly's Avatar
Back on topic, where is OP? This was starting to get interesting, now it is just blah.
I'm proficient at accumulating them if you hadn't noticed.
Pretty sure if you do the math you'll find I've been banned more than active since 2011.
If you manage to stick around, you'll see me banned again, because I don't follow rules, and I don't care about consequences.