Up Where? Up someone's ass, either yours or Whispers, or both! I'm surprised you needed that spelled out!
Originally Posted by nuglet
It's funny that I make a comment about your stated review process, and you think that is coming to Whispers' defense. Insecure much? If you cannot see the difference, then I don't have much hope for you. That said, I will ask, show me where I have come to Whispers' defense in this thread.
Says the guy with 4 reviews. I write when I want, and at my discretion. How about you?
You really don't see the irony in this, do you? Guy with 4 reviews talking about the lack of reviews of one with 2 reviews. OK, I write when I want, and at my discretion. However, you have stated in your own words that you do not write when you want and not at your discretion - "If and WHEN I post a review, it'll be at the ladies request." Your words, Einstein. The two quoted statements from you are exclusive of each other. So quit talking out both ends of your torso.
Actually what I think is that it's one of your business! I think you just like brown nosing ( do you know what that is or do I need to explain that too!) someone that you think will help you. Spineless comes to mind! No free will comes to mind. Otherwise why would you step in to defend ..uh WHO!
Oh, I think it’s everyone’s business to be aware of others’ review process and methods. Notice that I never told you how or when to review, just thanked you for letting me know. So I have not overstepped my bounds in terms of your freedom to review when and how you (the provider) review. However, it’s every member’s business to understand and put in context the reviewer and the review. As for brown-nosing, are you really that dimwitted to think that commenting on one your statements, if it happens to disagree with you, is in defense of whoever you were arguing with? Then you have the gall to call me spineless? Try taking it like a man. You made a comment while arguing with Whispers that I took exception to. I commented on it. There are now two threads of conversations. Is that too much for you?
I don't ask you who to fuck.. good thing since you don't review either, and I don't need your permission.. So grown up(as you so cleverly put it, Brainiac), try free will thinking for a change instead of being controlled. Really, try it, you'll like it.. It's scary at first, but go ahead, you'll get the hang of it..
If you asked me who to fuck, I wouldn’t tell you. Nor did I, at any point, say you needed my permission to fuck anyone or review anyone. Why is it that you take such offense to me thanking you for stating your review process? Why do you think I’ve said all these things that never crossed my mind? I don’t let people put words in my mouth so try another tactic. Yet you talk about free will. In order to have free will, you must first be willing to think clearly, logically, and reasonably. If you are incapable of that, then you leave the door open for others to control you. Try not to assign words to me that I have not typed. Denying accusations I never made equates to that, in case that escapes you.
Oh come on. I've done the same thing and I've always been open about, in fact the only times I've ever done reviews (1 here, I think maybe 4 or 5 on ASPD) were for new providers who needed the visibility, and I said that straight up *in the review*.
If you don't think a positive review isn't money in the bank for a provider, you're fooling yourself. They live or die based on how often their names appear in the review forum - far more read that then the drama festival here.
Originally Posted by Vyt
If you stated that in your review, then it speaks for itself. I understand that a positive review is of value to a provider. In fact, calling nuglet’s “requested” review an ad is assigning that value (to the provider) to his review. As to the other side of the coin, you understand that it does temper the value of that review to a hobbyist? I thank you for being open about your review policy, and I am glad that nuglet decided to openly state it here as well.
So Brainiac.. which word applies to your master now.. Respectful, or Civil..?
Just curious how you read it.
Originally Posted by nuglet
You are...not bright. Whispers’ WK might have been funny the first couple of times, but really, are you still blowing that horn, lapdog? Reason I said that you misunderstood respect and civility is that I consider him civil (for the most part), but not respectful. Repect is earned, not required, while civility (I think) should be the standard of how one treats others until given reason not to. As for the racist accusation, I don’t agree. Of course, that won’t surprise you, just as it’s not surprising that you jumped on that bandwagon as soon as you got the chance. BTW, nuglet, how many of Whispers’ threads would one have to jump in to whine about being tired of Whispers’ threads before it’s considered stalking? Why are you so choked up on his nuts?